That's fine. That's your interpretation of how the coutry should run. You accept that life doesn't work that way, I don't. My interpretation of how things should be differs.
See that's the problem. I'm telling you how it is and you are telling me how it should be. That's fine. Do not confuse what is with how it ought to be.
Living in a "free" country means always having a choice. I'm not subject to being forced to do anything I don't want to. That doesn't mean I have a right to kill or cause pain to fellow citizens and if anything this freedom puts more responsibility on me to do the right and proper thing if I truely desire peace and prosperity for my neighbor. Living in a truly free country grants me the right to keep the fruits of my labor. Not being able to do so, is considered theft.
You have to register with the selective service. You have to have auto insurance before you can drive a car. You have to pay your taxes to live in a free country.
Just b/c you don't like a certain tax expenditure does not make the collection of that tax 'theft'. I'm sorry but that's just absurd. That's the height of uninformed selfishness b/c you fail to acknowledge our democratic republic's governance by consent of the governed and all the achievements in this country that made your life even possible here. As I've said, you tacitly agree to be bound by the directives of this gov. simply b/c you live here. Some of those directives are unsavory to you but not others. That's not stealing or some other crime, that's the trappings of living in a society like ours.
Everyone has this choice. Government wants you to believe you don't. Politicians are our servants, we tell them how we want things to run, not the other way around. People seem to have forgotten tht's how it's suppose to be. No one has to be burdened if they learn who they are within the system and what their true rights are.
If you don't like certain tax expenditre then petition your representative or organize a political coalition to have those expenditures changed.
In my opinion, if every man is created equal, this means that no one has authority over me. I have not granted that authority to anyone.
All men are not created equal. How do I know? I don't have Michael Jordan's ability play ball. I don't have Hawking's ability to analyze theoretical physics...we should, ideally, be born with equal opportunity but even that's bullshit. If GW Bush wasn't born a Bush, he'd be selling shoes in Decatur, IL.
You have granted authority over yourself to the gov. b/c you are the gov in this country. Governing by the consent of the governed....except where BINDAREDUNDAT is concerned. Why are you special over the rest of us?
I find it amusing how often roads and infastructure are used to rationalize taxing others to death. Suddendly everyone cares for the roads. But how much is collected compared to how much is actually spent on these things? Income tax and other taxes haven't gone down substantially. Why is it that infastructure is falling apart? Do you really trust that the money goes where they say it goes? Part of collecting full welfare compensation is having an address, I don't know how many homeless people I've seen or heard of from social workers that are collecting full benefits and the first thing the do is go and shoot up. No one is checking to see if these are legitimate cases, so it goes on and on and on.
Infrastructure is falling apart b/c massmurdering cocksuckers like Bush and Big Mac are pissing away billions a week in an illegal occupation of IRaq, bailing out criminal corporations so that elitest fucks can walk away from a disaster they manufactured with millions in their pockets, and generally feeding over 1/2 our annual budget to unneeded military escalation. I don't get pissed about fucking food stamps to hungry people. No.
Thanks for your selective 'worse of the worst' to characterize the average AFDC recipient. That's the problem you and Hereford think every colored junky out there is getting a ride on your coattails mate. Do you know the stats for AFDC recipients? I do.
Also, based on the fact that certain systems such as welfare, for example, have been around for as long as they have and have not helped to the degree they should have, proves to me that they are a failure. I don't like to support failing programs or programs that enable people to stay dependant on a system that I'm paying for. If you subsidize something, you always get more of it.
This is another rightwing absurdity. Do you know what the poverty rate in this country was before AFDC? Do you know the time limit of benefits paid for AFDC recipients? Do you know that minorities are not the biggest percentage of recipients of AFDC? Or are you just regurgitating tired rightwing cliches?
Do you know that country's with the most spending on Welfare have the lowest poverty rates? Do you know that in 1964 prior to Johnson's declaration of war on poverty, the US had a 19% poverty level and by 1973, after the implementation of augmented spending, the rate dropped to 11% and stayed that way for the most part?
Primarly privatly funded institutions like the Salvation Army, seem to be more efficient at helping those in need as opposed to bureaucratic government agencies that waste time and money.
How do you know this? Do you also know that gov. is much much much more efficient than the private sector re administrative businesses such as running insurance or the like. It's not even close in some cases. The efficiency of the private secotr over the public is another cherished myth of the right.
Sorry, I'm starting to go on a rant and I hope I articulated myself alright, its late, I'm tired as heck and I could go ona and on but anyway you should read this little book. It's an eye opener, at least for me it was.
I know and I apologize if I come off as tendentious.
HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN ... a Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are
Here's a link that debunks most tax avoidance myths. It is great and it's free.
http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html