Author Topic: Would Yates 93 have won yesterday? (Read 24485 times)

QuakerOats · « **Reply #200 on:** February 23, 2009, 01:06:57 PM »

boom

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #201 on:** February 23, 2009, 01:38:03 PM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on February 23, 2009, 01:06:57 PM

boom

Destroyed Nasser in 1994

brent2741 · « **Reply #202 on:** February 23, 2009, 03:38:11 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2009, 01:38:03 PM

Destroyed Nasser in 1994

boom

nicorulez · « **Reply #203 on:** February 23, 2009, 05:38:36 PM »

Quote from: The_Hammer on September 28, 2008, 05:45:12 AM

Dorian was undefeated.

Ronnie and Jay not so much.

Hammer, sorry for the late reply but Haney and Benaziza smoked Dorian. He was far from undefeated. Moreover, a couple of his wins in 96 and 97 were gifts to the nth degree. I think Gutler from his first Mr. Olympia and a couple of 2nd place finishes smoked Dorian.

nicorulez · « **Reply #204 on:** February 23, 2009, 05:39:47 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2009, 01:38:03 PM

Destroyed Nasser in 1994

Yeah and the Presidency has become a popularity contest. A war hero loses to a senator from the most corrupt state in the Union. Oh well, bodybuilding contests are never fixed.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #205 on:** February 23, 2009, 05:41:37 PM »

Quote from: nicorulez on February 23, 2009, 05:39:47 PM

Yeah and the Presidency has become a popularity contest. A war hero loses to a senator from the most corrupt state in the Union. Oh well, bodybuilding contests are never fixed.

No contests are only fixed when YOU disagree with the outcome

great logic

if one contest is fixed THEY ARE ALL fixed and your hero received the same treatment you can't have it both ways

honest · « **Reply #206 on:** February 23, 2009, 06:22:30 PM »

Yates in his 93 shape is still the best overall Mr Olympia winner ever, I think Ronnie in his best shape could have beaten him in a couple of his other wins but only when he was at his best and Dorian wasnt, Both at their best, Dorians would have won, as he was more complete. Ronnies lack of Calves that flex and his lack of detail to his midsection in comparsion would have been the influencing factors, im talking before before both their guts blew out, at their best only.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #207 on:** February 23, 2009, 06:23:25 PM »

Quote from: honest on February 23, 2009, 06:22:30 PM

Yates in his 93 shape is still the best overall Mr Olympia winner ever, I think Ronnie in his best shape could have beaten him in a couple of his other wins but only when he was at his best and Dorian wasnt, Both at their best, Dorians would have won, as he was more complete. Ronnies lack of Calves that flex and his lack of detail to his midsection in comparsion would have been the influencing factors, im talking before before both their guts blew out, at their best only.

Smart man , right on the money.

Hulkster · « **Reply #208 on:** February 23, 2009, 07:01:25 PM »

Quote

Ronnies lack of Calves that flex and his lack of detail to his midsection in comparsion would have been the influencing factors

so, you think ronnie's lack of detail in the midsection would hurt him, but dorian's lack of detail in the arms, delts, pecs and quads wouldn't hurt him? LOL

bigbobs · « **Reply #209 on:** February 23, 2009, 07:13:51 PM »

Quote from: TrueGrit on September 28, 2008, 05:41:29 AM

Please don't make this yet another variation on the Ronnie Vs Dorian theme. It's a boring, played-out argument that is not relevant here.

A lonely cry that went over deaf ears $:-\$

9 pages and counting

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #210 on:** February 23, 2009, 07:20:41 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on February 23, 2009, 07:13:51 PM

A lonely cry that went over deaf ears $:-\$

9 pages and counting

Hulkster realized he's was soundly defeated by me via his own hero he's moved onto Nasser now he's your headache now lol

honest · « **Reply #211 on:** February 23, 2009, 07:26:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 23, 2009, 07:01:25 PM

so, you think ronnie's lack of detail in the midsection would hurt him, but dorian's lack of detail in the arms, delts, pecs and quads wouldn't hurt him? LOL

sorry Hulkster im not going there.

bodybuilder1234 · « **Reply #212 on:** February 24, 2009, 11:12:10 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 02, 2008, 06:10:01 PM

I havent really analyzed the shots, but from what I have seen he does look better than Dex in a lot of poses

for example:

damn, Dexter's arms are dwarfing Phil's there and Heath is closer to the camera

Hulkster · « **Reply #213 on:** February 24, 2009, 01:54:10 PM »

Quote from: honest on February 23, 2009, 07:26:37 PM

sorry Hulkster im not going there because I would lose to Hulkster's overwhelming sense of correctness.

fixed

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #214 on:** February 24, 2009, 02:00:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 24, 2009, 01:54:10 PM

fixed

correctness? like Ronnie 99 had more detailed calves than Dorian? LMFAO

owned yet again

Hulkster · « **Reply #215 on:** February 24, 2009, 02:12:30 PM »

okay Mr. dorian had better arms than Ronnie...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #216 on:** February 24, 2009, 02:22:57 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 24, 2009, 02:12:30 PM

okay Mr. dorian had better arms than Ronnie...

Better triceps & forearms absolutely

Mr Ronnie 99 was better conditioned than Dorian ever was LMMFAO

d0nny2600 · « **Reply #217 on:** February 24, 2009, 02:24:12 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 24, 2009, 01:54:10 PM

fixed

You sir are a complete retard

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #218 on:** February 24, 2009, 02:30:36 PM »

Quote from: d0nny2600 on February 24, 2009, 02:24:12 PM

You sir are a complete retard

Hulkster = owned

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #219 on:** February 24, 2009, 02:35:13 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 24, 2009, 02:32:41 PM

this is true

NO ONE was better conditioned than Yates

While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian