Stealth Islamisation: Canadian Edition

[Nordic Superman]

See: http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/538703

Eight Muslim women who filed a human rights complaint against the United Parcel Service (UPS) over a dress code dispute, settled with the company yesterday.

---

Give them an inch, they take a mile and nobody seems to care!

[Nordic Superman]

Here's a nice comment by some astute chap:

If you are an Anglo-Saxon, Greek Orthodox, Hindu, Buddhist or some other sect, would you have been extended this courtesy? What we sow, so shall we reap. Blame Trudeau and the crypto-communists(aka socialists) for this problem. We can add greedy businesses(aided by the wingnuts) to that list. They were also in it for the cheap refugee labour that refuses to integrate. This cultural extortion, my friends, is a reflection of the new "Canadian Values". Have a nice day!

[24KT]

Here's an even better comment reflective of the situation:

you have absolutely no point at all...are you saying that a company has no right whatsoever to reassess safty proceedures and make them better? Thats ridiculous..one upon a time America had slaves too... but someone reassessed the situation and decided to change that...what a joke of a comment.. UPS made a Mistake dude...they realized they put people into a hazardous situation, perhaps not realizing those skirts would be worn on the job outside the interview. it would seem once they realized what was going on they did what was in the best interest of Saftey for both the employees and the company. Because a mistake is made and missed, does not give the right to keep it that way because "Islam told you so"

[Nordic Superman]

So Jag, safety requirements are eternal and cannot be re-assesed, simply because they might encroach on a persons whimsical self beliefs?

I quote from the article:

The women, all devout Muslims, lost their jobs in 2005 because they refused to hike their skirts above the knee over their long pants.

In the end, yesterday's settlement means the tribunal did not answer the key question: Was it discrimination, or a legitimate safety concern?

This just shows the apologetic nature of the settlement. Nothing was confirmed, just that muslims were given yet another means for financial gain from their personal beliefs.

[garebear]

So Jag, safety requirements are eternal and cannot be re-assesed, simply because they might encroach on a persons whimsical self beliefs?

I quote from the article:

This just shows the apologetic nature of the settlement. Nothing was confirmed, just that muslims were given yet another means for financial gain from their personal beliefs.

Have you ever seen the stealth bass boat?

Me neither.

Exactly, Batman.

[Nordic Superman]

Have you ever seen the stealth bass boat?

Me neither.

Exactly, Batman.

Nice grasp of the English language and your reasoning to absolutist when it comes to the definition of words. Lack of absolutism is a key reason why the English language is so majestic and pliable.

Stealth islamism is basically the encroaching of islamic values on a group of people that are unaware. Like children in schools being fed halal meat to satisfy the personal beliefs of a small minority of people.