so now "poor judging decisions" is what is used to explain the many fixes in the sports greatest show?
Haney 8 - 3 "poor judging decisions"
Dorian 6 - 3 "poor judging decisions"
Ronnie 8 - 4 "poor judging decisions"
chick, if i too were a mere puppet, I would really like your terminology, it sounds PC !
I see you can't even form a response as to how Victor (no AMI contract) loses to Jay,
for Dexter to sign on, then beat Jay (who had clearly improved since 07)
2001 is a great example....Jay SHOULD have won, without question...Allegedly, he was supposed to win, was the great white hope, was the touted Weider guy...was supposed to beat Coleman so there could be a great rematch the next year, was ahead on the scorecard after the prejudging.....but he ended up losing.
Same thing goes for Gunter beating Ronnie at the GNC show....allegedly "set up" so Gunter could then go on to win the Olympia and Joe's favorite son could be the next Mr. O.....
Poor jusding decisions don't lead to a full blown conspiracy...
BTW...just so you know...Dexter has the same AMI contract that Jay does. Perhaps bringing it up a THIRD time will make it mean something more to you