yawn, the pics don't lie. Ronnie was already the same width as Dorian in 96, and even wider in 03. Spare me the lame excuse "he doesn't hold his pose like Ronnie does." 
I don't see that stopping you from posting the back double biceps shot where Dorian is fully hitting the pose while Ronnie isn't flaring his lats yet. Let's also not forget that Dorian was much closer to his prime than Ronnie.
how is posting comparisons using Kevin Levrone as a reference "trying to connect the dots?" It's as simple as B is almost as wide as A but much narrower than C.
silly boy, I own your ass in logic. So don't belittle my reasoning abilities b/c it only makes you look foolish. The back double biceps pic you keep posting doesn't prove anything. Dorian and Ronnie aren't hitting the identical pose, and Dorian was 1 yr away from his prime while Ronnie wouldn't peak for another 5-7 yrs (depending on version).
Oh noes, Ronnie has higher lats that Dorian! The difference is only like 1 cm.
upper traps? Where are you?
my, how easy it is to disprove you with pics. 
now let me wrap up why Ronnie has a better back. 
yawn, the pics don't lie. Ronnie was already the same width as Dorian in 96, and even wider in 03. Spare me the lame excuse "he doesn't hold his pose like Ronnie does." I don't see that stopping you from posting the back double biceps shot where Dorian is fully hitting the pose while Ronnie isn't flaring his lats yet. Let's also not forget that Dorian was much closer to his prime than Ronnie.
No pics do lie NICE TRY and they don't lie when they suit your ignorant claims
more retard logic from boy-Neo again Dorian is to the far left and he's not flaring his lats out like Coleman therefore that's not accurate , look at the pic from 1997 where he is clearly standing relaxed with his lats fully flared out you'd be sorely mistaken if you think Ronnie is ' wider ' than that any year , perhaps Ronnie tied him or maybe had even a slight advantage but to claim it's clear cut is nonsense , just look at the difference from the same contest in the back double biceps shot of the two side-by-side NO excuses NO angles if Ronnie's back truly was wider than Dorians in 1996 it would be clearly evident so spare me the excuse he's not fulling flexing his lats , that's how he does his back double biceps shot and it's clearly evident he's not as wide and even entertaining he is wider in 2003 so what at the expense of density lol you're fucked either way
how is posting comparisons using Kevin Levrone as a reference "trying to connect the dots?" It's as simple as B is almost as wide as A but much narrower than C.
No it's not simple as ABC , sorry to many intangeables , angle , lighting , weights , posing , etc , etc another poor attempt by you trying to connect the dots you tried ( and failed ) with Cutler's calves
silly boy, I own your ass in logic. So don't belittle my reasoning abilities b/c it only makes you look foolish. The back double biceps pic you keep posting doesn't prove anything. Dorian and Ronnie aren't hitting the identical pose, and Dorian was 1 yr away from his prime while Ronnie wouldn't peak for another 5-7 yrs (depending on version).
You couldn't own me or my logic if this was 1860 and I was black , you'd have to know what you're talking about and I have proven time and time again YOU'RE ignorant about competitive bodybuilding. and that pic I posted proves many things , such as trap length , lat and torso length , detail and development of the teres and infranspinatus , no funny angles , NO Dorian to the far left and I said many times neither were at their all-time best and spare me the Dorian was one year away nonsense , you're always reaching with semantics , playing your retard game Ronnie was just 2 years away from his
1998 is considered his best Olympia showing so once again see fail you know the way you've been there many times before
Oh noes, Ronnie has higher lats that Dorian! The difference is only like 1 cm.
lmfao I love your expert guesstimates lol wow 1cm
Ronnie's wider despite never seeing the two side-by-side live & in person , I can always count on you for a laugh , ever consider torso length? 1cm
or how about a picture of the two side-by-side live in person on the same stage , oh we have one of those and it clearly shows Dorian's torso is long and his lats insert much lower , Coleman is like Haney with a shorter torso and longer legs , other clear example of you being ignorant and trying to downplay another clear advantage of Dorians
upper traps? Where are you?
You think posting one pic proves anything? just your bias and stupidity , consider all things , all angles . just look at the staggering difference in trap size between the two in the back double biceps shot among many others , Dorians traps are out of this world
my, how easy it is to disprove you with pics.
You didn't prove anything , it's not where near the level of Dorian not by a country mile , Dorian's x-mass destroys these with ease
now let me wrap up why Ronnie has a better back.
Thanks for not being able to prove Ronnie has a better back and rely on popular opinion lol in 2000 they voted Yates best back this was during Ronnie's reign you never did answer why this new poll is correct and the other is now defunct lol what improved? how about other polls that clearly says Dorian's is better? how about Ronnie in 2003 conceded Dorian's back is the ' thickest & freakiest ' he's seen ? how about Samir Bannout in 2002 saying Dorian's is the best or many others? epic failed escaped attempt lol
Dorian has bigger and better traps covered in striations and are separated from the upper & lower , Ronnie's aren't advantage Dorian
Dorian has lower lats , longer torso , better sweep and feathered striations much more clearly defined than Ronnie , advantage Dorian
Dorian's teres & infraspinatus are bigger and more detailed than Ronnie , advantage Dorian
Dorian's lower back is much more clearly defined and his spinal erectors are thicker , advantage Dorian
so where is Ronnie beating Dorian in the back department? yeah I thought so
