Monica as you never seen her before

[divcom]

what .....i have a house in aspen ...... and she can bring scott too is she wants.

where?  i've done some clinical work with patients out there.  prices?  photo would be nice.

[drkaje]

All relationships are a distraction.

[El_Pajero]

yeah Mo is the best

take a look at that horrible gh jaw 

[The_Punisher]

hey consider this gmflex.

I got off to that Pic years ago......lol

[The General]

and her mom.

[Soundness]

hey gies just see Mo as u never seen her before...

Now that's a cute picture, but with that shape you could have gotten an incredible one.

More photographers need to be thinking about SHAPE. They take pictures from these head-on, two-dimensional angles that don't display the fine shape of tits, ass, and other beautiful bodily shapes to their full potential. Come on, now, we can do better.

It's strange, because it's a matter of being more sensitive to the beauty of the shapes. If it's the shapes that leave the impression, focus on the shapes. Ask yourself, "what angle would emphasize such curvature to the greatest potential degree?" Let your camera act as your eyeball and look at the body from the most eye-catching, dynamic approach you can come up with. There you go, that is what will leave you in awe.

See, it's not just about showing someone something, or how something looks. It's actually about making something look even more like the way it looks than the way it actually looks. And you can do that with the way you look at it, the camera acting as your eyeball.

[The General]

Mo still rules.

[Fatpanda]

lets face facts - she's no jamie eason.

[Mars]

jamie is a skinny tit. i would be afraid to break her while riding that scrawny lil ass of hers.

[egj13]

I think she looks great. 

[divcom]

lets face facts - she's no jamie eason.

yep...and she isnt apart of the Mandy Blank Club like Eason.  Where's the butt?  Even heavy squats dont work. 

[Fatpanda]

ah yes, its now clear, divcom+mars = ragin homos 

[divcom]

ah yes, its now clear, divcom+mars = ragin homos 

thanks.  still prefer more trunk space on a woman.

[Arkadius]

 

[Soundness]

lets face facts - she's no jamie eason.

Good taste, panda. You may have noticed my avatar:



Jamie's my favorite girl. And, her ass may be smaller than some, but I it's nice:



Check out the Johnny Crosslin gallery at http://www.johnnycrosslin.com/viewer/jamie/jamieframetest.htm and the Ironman Forums gallery at http://www.ironmagazineforums.com/gallery/showgallery.php/cat/597.

Timea looks incredible, too, of course. Timea and Jamie are two of the sexiest.

[Fatpanda]

Good taste, panda. You may have noticed my avatar:



Jamie's my favorite girl. And, her ass may be smaller than some, but I it's nice:



Check out the Johnny Crosslin gallery at http://www.johnnycrosslin.com/viewer/jamie/jamieframetest.htm and the Ironman Forums gallery at http://www.ironmagazineforums.com/gallery/showgallery.php/cat/597.

Timea looks incredible, too, of course. Timea and Jamie are two of the sexiest.

i agree, it seems she's too hot for some of the closets on here though 

all the more for me i suppose 

[Soundness]

i agree, it seems she's too hot for some of the closets on here though 

all the more for me i suppose 

Yes, if a man is straight, he will undoubtedly find Jamie's particular combination of assets irresistible. Her appearance is a display of all female and no male. She's gorgeous and has this innocent, femenine look, yet she has a way of leaving the impression that there's a hidden bundle of bed freak in there aching to emerge. That means something to a straight man.

But, why wouldn't a man find her sexy as hell? I think if a man is truly straight, he'll find her attractive, no matter what. To claim she isn't attractive on any level is to declare oneself homosexual on a considerable level. Perhaps to such individuals, she's too femenine, she exemplifies a lack of "maleness" to too great of a degree for them. I'd say perhaps they desire more masculinity (thickness), that they want even their women to atleast resemble a man to some degree. If that's what they like, that's fine, but that's why they wouldn't find Jamie Eason attractive.

[The General]

hey Mo is featured in the latest eddition of muscle and fitness so you better check it up.

[Fatpanda]

Yes, if a man is straight, he will undoubtedly find Jamie's particular combination of assets irresistible. Her appearance is a display of all female and no male. She's gorgeous and has this innocent, femenine look, yet she has a way of leaving the impression that there's a hidden bundle of bed freak in there aching to emerge. That means something to a straight man.

But, why wouldn't a man find her sexy as hell? I think if a man is truly straight, he'll find her attractive, no matter what. To claim she isn't attractive on any level is to declare oneself homosexual on a considerable level. Perhaps to such individuals, she's too femenine, she exemplifies a lack of "maleness" to too great of a degree for them. I'd say perhaps they desire more masculinity (thickness), that they want even their women to atleast resemble a man to some degree. If that's what they like, that's fine, but that's why they wouldn't find Jamie Eason attractive.

i believe you have hit the nail on the head with this post.

[divcom]

jimmies...who said she wasnt attractive?  no butt is her problem.  why sit here and praise a woman who aint your type which doesnt mean i wouldnt tip it if i had the chance?  she looks like most of the nurses i cross paths with, nothing to die for but f##kable.  i'll keep my brownie, and you can keep her poster on your wall.

Sho Ya Right!




BTW...gina looks more like my current girl.  it's all about taste.


same curly hair, dark eyes and jawline. 

Peace. 

[Soundness]

jimmies...who said she wasnt attractive?  no butt is her problem.  why sit here and praise a woman who aint your type which doesnt mean i wouldnt tip it if i had the chance?  she looks like most of the nurses i cross paths with, nothing to die for but f##kable.  i'll keep my brownie, and you can keep her poster on your wall.

Sho Ya Right!




BTW...gina looks more like my current girl.  it's all about taste.


same curly hair, dark eyes and jawline. 

Peace. 

Respect. She's feminine there.

What I see here are two different styles. They actually have similar bodies. Here, the difference is really in skin color and hair color. Gina's got darker skin, longer and darker hair, than Jamie, and a couple details you've pointed out are different as well. One person may prefer Jamie's style more while another more of Gina's. But essentially, they are very similar, at least judging from the picture you posted. Their bodies are similar. Gina also may have more ass, which you apparently place a very heavy value on. That's understandable. Like I said, personally I still prefer Jamie and think she's got a fine ass.

[The General]

jamie was featured a week ago in the reality show 'workout' which is centered around a gym with its female trainers are lesbians and males gays,so one of the guy was training her and the female trainers were picking on her tits.....that was so rude and guess what happened at the end her trainer was defending her as a cancer survivor {which was good} after the show I felt so bad for jamie,indeed she deserves all the credit from us all. 

[divcom]

tyra banks is to kate moss as lena is to jamie.  i'm talking full figured here.

[Soundness]

tyra banks is to kate moss as lena is to jamie.  i'm talking full figured here.

Holy shit!  Flawless.

Jamie's got this "cuteness" quality that, to me, is unparalleled, though.
There is something about her face that is golden as well.

[The General]

yeah she looks great but not as Mo