Author Topic: Was Rachel McLish natural?  (Read 5062 times)

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Was Rachel McLish natural?
« on: December 30, 2008, 06:14:54 PM »
 ???

wnybodybuildingfan

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2008, 06:16:46 PM »
I think her beautiful physique was natural. 

saucetradomous

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3000
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2008, 06:19:11 PM »
useless without pics

Bast000

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 8144
  • Team Malk-Gallon
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2008, 06:20:39 PM »
are her tits?

The ChemistV2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2008
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2008, 06:20:48 PM »
Yes, I doubt you'd be able to pull her undies down and see one of those hideous Vienna sausages between her legs. Never had a maculinized face or voice, no Platz jaw. Those days of women's bodybuilding are long gone.

wnybodybuildingfan

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2008, 06:21:26 PM »
Here is one

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2008, 06:22:11 PM »

luvvsuNOT

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 834
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2008, 06:22:56 PM »
Rachel was as far as a women should go, with maybe Cory Everson. But after Cory it became a freak show.

wnybodybuildingfan

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2008, 06:23:03 PM »
Here is a good one.

wnybodybuildingfan

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2008, 06:24:30 PM »
Third one.

wnybodybuildingfan

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2008, 06:26:10 PM »
Last one!

luvvsuNOT

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 834
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2008, 06:26:44 PM »
Read gh15 Bible. No natural nothing. Only diff is the degree of "unnaturalness."

saucetradomous

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3000
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2008, 06:27:39 PM »
yeah them tits are definetly fake

luvvsuNOT

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 834
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2008, 06:32:41 PM »
yeah them tits are definetly fake

Don't forget the clen, t3 and var.

ripitupbaby

  • Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6952
  • 2010 Olympia Pro Powerlifting Champ
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #14 on: December 30, 2008, 06:34:12 PM »
Maybe... maybe not.

:)

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2008, 06:37:55 PM »
Rachel was as far as a women should go, with maybe Cory Everson. But after Cory it became a freak show.

You just can't handle this much woman...


luvvsuNOT

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 834
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2008, 06:45:27 PM »
You just can't handle this much woman...



Shoots, I'm at work so the pic isn't coming up but I suspect you might be right. Rachel was about as good as it gets for me. Also, there was another one from back in that day, Gladys Portuguez, or something like that. She use to be married to Van Damme. In fact, I think I read somewhere that they recently got back together.
That was one fine piece of A if you don't mind my saying.

johnnynoname

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18257
  • i have a face like a shovel
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2008, 06:46:43 PM »
In fact, I think I read somewhere that they recently got back together.


yes- they remarried

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2008, 06:47:27 PM »
, Gladys Portuguez,


Yeah she was hot!!!
But Sharon Bruneau was just as hot if not better ;)

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:34 PM »
Shoots, I'm at work so the pic isn't coming up

It's a studio portrait of Kim Chizevsky in a front lat spread, somewhat resembling the actor Oded Fehr.

Trust me... it's a lot of woman.

luvvsuNOT

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 834
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2008, 06:57:12 PM »
It's a studio portrait of Kim Chizevsky in a front lat spread, somewhat resembling the actor Oded Fehr.

Trust me... it's a lot of woman.

Kim Chizesky? Nuff said. Maybe if I went on a Lee Priest cycle (his real cycle) I might begin to approach that beast. And I see that you use the term "woman" rather loosely.

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #21 on: December 30, 2008, 07:09:30 PM »
i'm pretty sure almost all female bber's from the start (late 70's) used at least low androgen orals...

jesusbod

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1947
  • Bite Me!
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #22 on: December 30, 2008, 07:34:39 PM »
I think BAY would stick it to Rachel... hahahahaha!

wnybodybuildingfan

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #23 on: December 31, 2008, 05:40:15 AM »
Rachel was as far as a women should go, with maybe Cory Everson. But after Cory it became a freak show.
Totally agree!  Rachel and Cory had beautiful bodies but also sounded like a woman.  It's no wonder that there are less IFBB women's bodybuilding shows this year. 

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Was Rachel McLish natural?
« Reply #24 on: December 31, 2008, 05:43:55 AM »
yes most of them are molested in their youth.