Author Topic: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent  (Read 662 times)

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« on: February 13, 2009, 07:27:51 AM »
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/business/economy/13insolvent.html?_r=1

February 13, 2009
NEWS ANALYSIS
Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent

By STEVE LOHR
Some of the nation's large banks, according to economists and other finance experts, are like dead men walking.

A sober assessment of the growing mountain of losses from bad bets, measured in today's marketplace, would overwhelm the value of the banks' assets, they say. The banks, in their view, are insolvent.

None of the experts' research focuses on individual banks, and there are certainly exceptions among the 50 largest banks in the country. Nor do consumers and businesses need to fret about their deposits, which are federally insured. And even banks that might technically be insolvent can continue operating for a long time, and could recover their financial health when the economy improves.

But without a cure for the problem of bad assets, the credit crisis that is dragging down the economy will linger, as banks cannot resume the ample lending needed to restart the wheels of commerce. The answer, say the economists and experts, is a larger, more direct government role than in the Treasury Department's plan outlined this week.

The Treasury program leans heavily on a sketchy public-private investment fund to buy up the troubled mortgage-backed securities held by the banks. Instead, the experts say, the government needs to plunge in, weed out the weakest banks, pour capital into the surviving banks and sell off the bad assets.

It is the basic blueprint that has proved successful, they say, in resolving major financial crises in recent years.

Japan endured a lost decade of economic stagnation in the 1990s before it adopted such measures from 2001 to 2003.

The Swedish government took tough steps in 1992 and Washington did so in 1987 to 1989 to overcome the savings and loan crisis.

"The historical record shows that you have to do it eventually," said Adam S. Posen, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "Putting it off only brings more troubles and higher costs in the long run."

Of course, the Obama administration's stimulus plan could help to spur economic recovery in a timely manner and the value of the banks' assets could begin to rise.

Absent that, the prescription would not be easy or cheap. Estimates of the capital injection needed in the United States range to $1 trillion and beyond. By contrast, the commitment of taxpayer money is the $350 billion remaining in the financial bailout approved by Congress last fall.

Meanwhile, the loss estimates keep mounting.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2009, 07:32:35 AM »
this is getting retarded.  If the original bailout money went to the people, we'd be out of debt and their problems would be over.  They're intentionally crashing America.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2009, 07:33:08 AM »
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/business/economy/13insolvent.html?_r=1

February 13, 2009
NEWS ANALYSIS
Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent

By STEVE LOHR
Some of the nation's large banks, according to economists and other finance experts, are like dead men walking.

A sober assessment of the growing mountain of losses from bad bets, measured in today's marketplace, would overwhelm the value of the banks' assets, they say. The banks, in their view, are insolvent.

None of the experts' research focuses on individual banks, and there are certainly exceptions among the 50 largest banks in the country. Nor do consumers and businesses need to fret about their deposits, which are federally insured. And even banks that might technically be insolvent can continue operating for a long time, and could recover their financial health when the economy improves.

But without a cure for the problem of bad assets, the credit crisis that is dragging down the economy will linger, as banks cannot resume the ample lending needed to restart the wheels of commerce. The answer, say the economists and experts, is a larger, more direct government role than in the Treasury Department's plan outlined this week.

The Treasury program leans heavily on a sketchy public-private investment fund to buy up the troubled mortgage-backed securities held by the banks. Instead, the experts say, the government needs to plunge in, weed out the weakest banks, pour capital into the surviving banks and sell off the bad assets.

It is the basic blueprint that has proved successful, they say, in resolving major financial crises in recent years.

Japan endured a lost decade of economic stagnation in the 1990s before it adopted such measures from 2001 to 2003.

The Swedish government took tough steps in 1992 and Washington did so in 1987 to 1989 to overcome the savings and loan crisis.

"The historical record shows that you have to do it eventually," said Adam S. Posen, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "Putting it off only brings more troubles and higher costs in the long run."

Of course, the Obama administration's stimulus plan could help to spur economic recovery in a timely manner and the value of the banks' assets could begin to rise.

Absent that, the prescription would not be easy or cheap. Estimates of the capital injection needed in the United States range to $1 trillion and beyond. By contrast, the commitment of taxpayer money is the $350 billion remaining in the financial bailout approved by Congress last fall.

Meanwhile, the loss estimates keep mounting.


________________________ ________
SHTF everywhere.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2009, 07:35:33 AM »
Nevermind guys, the author of this article once stated he puts his left arm in the sleeve of his shirt first everytime. A clear sign that he is a free mason and sent by the devil.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2009, 07:46:55 AM »
Nevermind guys, the author of this article once stated he puts his left arm in the sleeve of his shirt first everytime. A clear sign that he is a free mason and sent by the devil.
jesus fucking christ, cry much?

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2009, 07:50:56 AM »
jesus fucking christ, cry much?

fucking christ is a clear sign of free masonry, I'll be watching you.

Dan-O

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9729
Re: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2009, 07:53:29 AM »
Ailing banks are going to require more aid to keep solvent. 

Wow, didn't see that one coming.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2009, 07:55:02 AM »
fucking christ is a clear sign of free masonry, I'll be watching you.
I'm always in ah at just how unglued some people become at a little conspiracy talk.  Some of you really wig out.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Ailing Banks May Require More Aid to Keep Solvent
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2009, 08:00:29 AM »
I'm always in ah at just how unglued some people become at a little conspiracy talk.  Some of you really wig out.

its  "awe", not "ah"

If you spent as much time reading a dictionary as you did reading about masons..... :D

By the way I'm flattered that I inspire you.