more
Tattoos are NOT sexy!
its not real...they are photoshopped.
uhhhh method.....this isnt the "hunk of shit" tattoo thread...but rather the "sexy" threadthere is nothing sexy about mario on the back of a mans arm.........now if it was the princess......
X2 .. lets stick to the sexy girls tattoo
I bet you would like to jerk off onto her legs you sick bastard!
Preferably fuck...but I'll take a jerkin'.....
Shit! Fourth one down looks ridiculous - would be hot as fuck without the tattoos.
GF wants a lower back tattooOr more famously known as a tramp-stamp. She's not doing it to be trampy per-se but she has some stretch marks in that area from dropping about 7 dress sizes when she was between 17 and 19. She's 30 now and has been a size 5 for years.Her stretch marks have slight bumps (convex not concave), they aren't red but are paler than her skin (they look like narrow tan lines from a bikini strap for example), they mostly run straight across the small of her back. The affected area is approx 7 inches across and about 3.5 inches high.She wants to tattoo the area so the marks are less obvious. I'm not crazy about it mainly because of the size of the tattoo required to really cover it up but I want to be supportive.Any comments, suggestions, ideas, recommendations or others? TIA
This is a tricky one.I personally am 100% against all chick tattoos, mostly because I prefer young/innocent/pretty and nothing says "I am a whore" more than a tattoo, particularly a large tattoo on the back.This is because:1. A tattoo proves that the girl wants people to look at her flesh (like a whore). Good girls don't want to advertise their flesh because....yes, you guessed it....they're not selling their flesh;2. A tattoo proves that the girl does not have anyone in her life who cares about her enough to prevent her from desecrating her flesh (like a whore/vagrant/runaway);3. A tattoo proves that the girl has low self-esteem (like a whore) because someone who loves themselves and loves the way they look would not believe that a sweaty biker with a needle gun could possibly improve upon the girl's attractiveness;4. The bottom line is that a stable, self-confident, beautiful, innocent, sweet, loved young woman with caring parents and a group of friends and family who care about her would almost certainly not get a big lower-back tattoo.However, stretch marks/scars are pretty fucking nasty. They can be a devastating destroyer of boners. I can understand why someone would want to cover them up in some way.My recommendation is that you take your gf to a plastic surgeon in a major hospital and determine whether there is a medical procedure which can fix the appearance of the stretch marks. If not, then she has a very tough choice.I don't know how bad the stretch marks are, but if they are a guaranteed 100% destroyer of boners, then I suppose you have nothing left to lose by inking her up like the Whore of Babylon. Please post some photos of the offending stretch marks.But don't be surprised if, after she gets a big tramp stamp, that it starts attracting a lot of unwanted attention since every guy who sees it will assume that she is a dirty slut who hands out $5 blowjobs on her knees in a piss-stained alley.And who knows? With that tramp stamp, she just might start sucking dirty filthy cock for spare change. Keep that in mind.
tattoo's on legs and oblique's for women are just grimy, lower class trash.
haha I killed the thread
this is from somewhere else. I saved it cause I knew something like this would come up OPBOOM!
