Conservatives Warn About Obama Judicial Nominee

[Decker]

What I dont understand is why they devoted so little to infrastructure projects in the stimilus bill.

210 billion is comparative peanuts.  Krugman wrote another article criticizing FDR for failing to spend more on exactly those types of things.  It goes without saying that Obama is trying to play both sides of the table.  He wants to satisfy both the average Joes and Wall street and he can't do that and expect satisfactory results.

To me, this is the crux of his problem, he tries to be all things to all people.  His health plan is rife with that kind of nonsense.

[LurkerNoMore]

More cliche' and pap.  Additionally, it operates on a false premise that what Obama is doing is going to make things better, when more and more people are revolting against him, including many in his own party.

Still got a long way to go before he reaches the number of Americans that revolt against him as they did against Bush.  Hell, Bush's own party pretty much disowned him.

So when that happens, then you can talk.  Until then you can carry on with the whining and excuse making.

[Soul Crusher]

Still got a long way to go before he reaches the number of Americans that revolt against him as they did against Bush.  Hell, Bush's own party pretty much disowned him.

So when that happens, then you can talk.  Until then you can carry on with the whining and excuse making.

Obama is getting there after 3 months, Bush took 7 years.  Big difference.

[LurkerNoMore]

And just imagine... you got three years nine months left of frustration and then... another four years.

Now come back and post how Obama is just for one term.  Meanwhile your party can't find a direction, voice, or candidate to save it's life.

[Soul Crusher]

And just imagine... you got three years nine months left of frustration and then... another four years.

Now come back and post how Obama is just for one term.  Meanwhile your party can't find a direction, voice, or candidate to save it's life.

The Gop deserved to lose. 

[shootfighter1]

Agreed George.  The justification for some of Obama's mistakes are well, Bush "insert criticizm".  That is childish and foolish.  We are not two rival gangs.  If Obama makes a bad policy, criticize it, don't justify it by citing an error by Bush.  Thats blind partisanism.

[Dos Equis]

Hey dumbass- you didn't address my question. If Bush performed poorly and hurt the country as everyone claims, is Obama now free to do exactly the same and make the country even worse just because Bush did?

And btw if the "Neocons" were the only ones blaming Clinton as you claim- Did the entire media jump on board and blame clinton? How about more than half the country? Was the answer to every single problem the country face answered the way it is now-- CLINTON LIED PEOPLE DIED etc. etc. etc.

The immaturity of the liberal position is almost comical, if it wasn't so stupid and scary. Bush was a bad president, so now Obama can destroy whats left of the country for kicks.

Two wrongs make a right to you fucking idiots and to hell with the consequences on the country.

I agree.  Very poor rationale.