Author Topic: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?  (Read 26187 times)

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Getbig!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2010, 10:38:09 AM »
Uncrowned Mr Olympia. No doubt about it.

On the contrary, there's PLENTY of doubt about it.

One, Ruhl lost just ONE WEEK LATER to a rookie, Art Atwood, at the Toronto Pro.

Two, less than a year later, he got beat by a FAR SMALLER (but better-shaped and proportioned) Darrem Charles as the Maximus Pro.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Getbig!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2010, 11:35:24 AM »
The most underrated bber of all time.  It's all politics.  Bbing is not judged objectively.   :(

So what were the "politics", when he lost to Art Atwood in Toronto?

Or, what were they when Darrem Charles beat him in 2003?

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #27 on: March 03, 2010, 01:35:06 PM »
So what were the "politics", when he lost to Art Atwood in Toronto?

Or, what were they when Darrem Charles beat him in 2003?

Exactly...as if there was some conspiracy. 

Speaking of which....I thought Marcus was a shoe-in for the top6 at the Olympia with Ultimate Nutrition coming on board, and MT out of the picture?

Amazing how all the idiots disappear real quick when they're made to look as stupid as they post

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #28 on: March 03, 2010, 01:46:06 PM »
Exactly...as if there was some conspiracy. 

Speaking of which....I thought Marcus was a shoe-in for the top6 at the Olympia with Ultimate Nutrition coming on board, and MT out of the picture?

Amazing how all the idiots disappear real quick when they're made to look as stupid as they post

you're a bitter middle aged man

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #29 on: March 03, 2010, 01:46:15 PM »
nobody besides mustafa mohammed has been screwed in the placings more times than RUHL.
the worst was in that grand prix show the year jay won the O...markus is standing next to jay and MURDERS him on each and every single shot, beats ronnie too, but still placed 3rd...and jay got 1st when he should have been behind both RUHL and ronnie.

tendonitis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #30 on: March 03, 2010, 01:49:51 PM »
Exactly...as if there was some conspiracy.  

Speaking of which....I thought Marcus was a shoe-in for the top6 at the Olympia with Ultimate Nutrition coming on board, and MT out of the picture?

Amazing how all the idiots disappear real quick when they're made to look as stupid as they post

It's not about Supplement contracts Chic, it's about Publishing contracts.  You know this yet you always bring up this supplement contract bullshit as some sort of smokescreen.
And since it's about Pusblishing contracts your boy the fridge won't be given another Sandow he doesn't deserve this year.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #31 on: March 03, 2010, 01:50:38 PM »
Markus Ruhl 15th place, and Moe ElWhothefuckcares in 10th place lol




JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #32 on: March 03, 2010, 02:33:36 PM »
Markus Ruhl 15th place, and Moe ElWhothefuckcares in 10th place lol





what a complete joke. no one can seriously defend that.

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #33 on: March 03, 2010, 02:36:39 PM »
Another AMI/Weider decision ::)

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #34 on: March 03, 2010, 02:41:20 PM »
It's not about Supplement contracts Chic, it's about Publishing contracts.  You know this yet you always bring up this supplement contract bullshit as some sort of smokescreen.
And since it's about Pusblishing contracts your boy the fridge won't be given another Sandow he doesn't deserve this year.

Its about whatever is conveinient to point a finger at by idiots on the internet...I was under contract with Weider when Marcus beat me for the NOC title...Plenty of un-sponsored athletes have won shows...and there are many other examples like Ronnie winning the Olympia in 98 over the much hyped Flex Wheeler, who was a Weider athlete...

emn1964

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6079
  • Getbig!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #35 on: March 03, 2010, 02:50:25 PM »
Hi Chick...how's Maleah?

nukkaready

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1014
  • Getbig!
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #36 on: March 03, 2010, 03:05:17 PM »
you're a bitter middle aged man

Chick is an arrogant 'I know it all' prick. If Markus Ruhl would have come up through the NPC he would have been Manion's poster boy and his career would have taken a much more triumphant turn. Markus killed Cutler at the 2000 NOC yet he lost. Markus destroyed everyone at the NOC in 99 and yet he placed 4th. He didn't even place at the 99 Mr. O yet he looked better than Nasser. The list goes on...

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #37 on: March 03, 2010, 03:18:47 PM »
Chick is an arrogant 'I know it all' prick. If Markus Ruhl would have come up through the NPC he would have been Manion's poster boy and his career would have taken a much more triumphant turn. Markus killed Cutler at the 2000 NOC yet he lost. Markus destroyed everyone at the NOC in 99 and yet he placed 4th. He didn't even place at the 99 Mr. O yet he looked better than Nasser. The list goes on...

2003 Arnold was pretty bad as well. Ruhl took 3rd behind Cutler and Cormier lol.

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #38 on: March 03, 2010, 03:24:44 PM »
Todays Pro contests are all about being a "monster" so wtf? Ruhl should dominate.

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #39 on: March 03, 2010, 03:29:07 PM »
Hi Chick...how's Maleah?

Great...thanks for asking

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #40 on: March 03, 2010, 03:30:57 PM »
Todays Pro contests are all about being a "monster" so wtf? Ruhl should dominate.

Apparently, they're not...as the "monsters" usually dont place as well as the others

CHOPPER1234

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #41 on: March 03, 2010, 03:37:05 PM »
Ruhls places could have something to do with him being drug tested and others not.

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #42 on: March 03, 2010, 03:40:01 PM »
Ruhls places could have something to do with him being drug tested and others not.

uhhhhhh.....yeah. thats it ::)

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #43 on: March 03, 2010, 03:43:28 PM »
Ruhls places could have something to do with him being drug tested and others not.

WHY would they test only him

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #44 on: March 03, 2010, 04:03:06 PM »


 Marcus Ruhl beats Cutler and Coleman here.
He beats them everytime in my book

CHOPPER1234

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #45 on: March 03, 2010, 04:08:46 PM »
It states in the rules any athlete can be tested any time I guess Marcus was just unlucky.

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #46 on: March 03, 2010, 04:09:43 PM »
Markus Ruhl has the best most muscular IMO..forgot what year it was he took the prize at the Olympia for that 02 or 03..christ for all I know he won most muscular a few times

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #47 on: March 03, 2010, 04:15:20 PM »
He didn't suck up to any officials? ::)
Rewrote from the heart! :-\
((-::

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #48 on: March 03, 2010, 04:16:50 PM »
Markus Ruhl has the best most muscular IMO..forgot what year it was he took the prize at the Olympia for that 02 or 03..christ for all I know he won most muscular a few times
He beats those schomes everytime in that department.

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: Why didn't Marcus Ruhl place higher?
« Reply #49 on: March 03, 2010, 04:24:48 PM »
He beats those schomes everytime in that department.
Even Ronnie!!!!
((-::