says the guy who can't even stick to the topic , the subject is the best Arnold Classic winner seeing you forgot
says the idiot who can't even stick to the discussion. You spewed some nonsense. I corrected you. Now you're trying to change the subject to save face.
alright, let's get back on topic. The best Arnold Classic winner is Ronnie... again, you picking Flex shows just how little you know about bodybuilding.
Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."
Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"
http://www.muscletime.com/news/contest-results/2007-mr-olympia-analysisPeter McGough - Flex, August 2005"Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004“As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable."
Jim Stoppani - Flex, July 2005"Has anyone ever displayed a more muscular, more shredded, higher-quality physique than a 247-pound Ronnie Coleman at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic?"
No , no my stupid little friend it's YOU who is in disagreement with the facts and no one else is claiming Ronnie was better conditioned so you're against the grain on this one . I provided the expert opinion in which YOU say isn't true , prove your case to the contrary and as usual I'll be waiting for you
on the contrary, you're the one who is in disagreement with the facts. I'm still waiting for you to prove 01 ASC Ronnie wasn't more conditioned than Dorian.
can you get any dumber? just like you not knowing that balance & proportion were two separate things and thinking you copied me verbatim despite changing all of my words around , go learn what unanimously means idiot , when the preface their statement that Dorian had the best back for much of the 90s and many people feel he still does and that they hedged their bets by stating a strong case can be made for him having the best back even today is NOT fucking unanimous you fucking moron
<yawn>
The 20 best backs of all time - Flex, March 2008
1. Ronnie Coleman
NO it doesn't not according to you moron and why? you said if you agree with one quote you are bound to every quote they made NOT me these are YOUR words and they were stupid back then just as they are now and I would never be so stupid as to claim this especially on a subjective topic , so once again I will point out your hypocrisy , Neo agrees with McGough when he types 01 best ever and then says outright wrong when he says Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian ontop of your original statement if you use one quote you have to believe everyone they make you're a hypocrite and a dumb one at that
"When you're ready to admit that Peter McGough is right about Ronnie having the best back ever and his 01 ASC physique beating every version of Dorian except pre-contest 93, then I will agree with Dorian having better conditioning."
it goes both ways, dumbass. I'm not going to agree with every quote from the same person if you're going to be a fag who thinks the same rules of fairness don't apply to him.
