Author Topic: Palinese....do you speak it? O'REilly doesn't (Read 4540 times)

240 is Back · « **Reply #25 on:** July 12, 2010, 02:22:55 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on July 12, 2010, 01:23:10 PM

I've already resigned myself to voting forwhoever runs against Obama.

Right now, VanderSloot/Madoff looks best to me since both are locked up for life and cant enact policies on me like Dear commie is trying to.

So you agree - "baby girl" wants amnesty for America?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #26 on:** July 12, 2010, 02:28:21 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on July 12, 2010, 02:22:55 PM

So you agree - "baby girl" wants amnesty for America?

I think she is playing games for the media.

AE · « **Reply #27 on:** July 12, 2010, 02:35:40 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on July 12, 2010, 07:20:43 AM

...
The blind spot you have for the piece of filfth you voted for who is actually destroying the nation intentionally is mind blowing.

Only a total a$$wipe and/or aspiring Limbaugh fluffer would refer to the President of the United States in that manner. You are truly pathetic. The good news is Obama will be President and the House and Senate will be Democratic until 2014 and probably through 2018. We will face hard times but will survive much better than we ever could under another failed republican majority and their sorry ass leadership.

240 is Back · « **Reply #28 on:** July 12, 2010, 02:36:41 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on July 12, 2010, 02:28:21 PM

I think she is playing games for the media.

Not sure what you mean.

She's speaking to Bill OReilly. She's not trading one-liners with the 'lamestream' media. She had plenty of time to clearly give her steps of what she'd do as president.

Her own words described Amnesty. No denying that.

So you think she's basically hispandering? These words are gonna bite her bigtime in 2011 if she runs. She just endorsed an amnesty program.

Straw Man · « **Reply #29 on:** July 12, 2010, 02:37:35 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on July 12, 2010, 01:57:23 PM

What I mean is that i'm not expecting to be proud of my vote or happy to vote for whoever runs against obama like you guys did in 2008 with the hope and change BS.

It could be Malik Shabazz/David Duke 2012 and they have my vote over Obama in 2012.

the option was for a geriatric sell out and Bible Spice or Obama/Biden

so far it's pretty obvious the country made the right choice

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #30 on:** July 12, 2010, 02:40:20 PM »

Quote from: AE on July 12, 2010, 02:35:40 PM

Only a total a$$wipe and/or aspiring Limbaugh fluffer would refer to the President of the United States in that manner. You are truly pathetic. The good news is Obama will be President and the House and Senate will be Democratic until 2014 and probably through 2018. We will face hard times but will survive much better than we ever could under another failed republican majority and their sorry ass leadership.

Even Gibbs is admitting the GOP is likely to take back the house in 2010.

Obama is a traitor, a communist, a piece of filth, and scum of the earth. Just what he is doing to Charles bolden to CYA his disgusting muslim outreach program for NASA is beyond words.

His economic agenda is horrific and roundly panned as a disaster by all but the most ignorant fools among us.

His incompetence on the BP oil spill speaks for itself.

ObamaCare is a disaster already as per the CBO.

His communist appointees and radical czars are worthy of the gallows in the town square.

Other than shooting the pirates, there is not one thing you can point to that he has done that is remotely note worthy in a good way.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #31 on:** July 12, 2010, 02:42:15 PM »

Quote from: Straw Man on July 12, 2010, 02:37:35 PM

the option was for a geriatric sell out and Bible Spice or Obama/Biden

so far it's pretty obvious the country made the right choice

Wrong - you had a chance to vote for Hillary, someone who I may disagree with, but is someone I know who does not hate this nation like obama does.

Straw Man · « **Reply #32 on:** July 12, 2010, 02:51:08 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on July 12, 2010, 02:42:15 PM

Wrong - you had a chance to vote for Hillary, someone who I may disagree with, but is someone I know who does not hate this nation like obama does.

why do you think I would take into consideration what YOU care about when I am voting

my first choice was Kucinich

Danny · « **Reply #33 on:** July 12, 2010, 03:04:09 PM »

Quote from: AE on July 12, 2010, 02:35:40 PM

Only a total a$$wipe and/or aspiring Limbaugh fluffer would refer to the President of the United States in that manner. You are truly pathetic. The good news is Obama will be President and the House and Senate will be Democratic until 2014 and probably through 2018. We will face hard times but will survive much better than we ever could under another failed republican majority and their sorry ass leadership.

Excellent post.

Danny · « **Reply #34 on:** July 12, 2010, 03:07:31 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on July 12, 2010, 02:40:20 PM

Even Gibbs is admitting the GOP is likely to take back the house in 2010.

Obama is a traitor, a communist, a piece of filth, and scum of the earth. Just what he is doing to Charles bolden to CYA his disgusting muslim outreach program for NASA is beyond words.

His economic agenda is horrific and roundly panned as a disaster by all but the most ignorant fools among us.

His incompetence on the BP oil spill speaks for itself.

ObamaCare is a disaster already as per the CBO.

His communist appointees and radical czars are worthy of the gallows in the town square.

Other than shooting the pirates, there is not one thing you can point to that he has done that is remotely note worthy in a good way.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiigght ...cuz you're the authority to speak on that matter .

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #35 on:** July 12, 2010, 03:40:52 PM »

Quote from: Danny on July 12, 2010, 03:07:31 PM

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigght ...cuz you're the authority to speak on that matter .

The facts,s taticts, figures speak for themselves.

War-Horse · « **Reply #36 on:** July 12, 2010, 04:06:45 PM »

Quote from: BILLY MIMNAUGH on July 12, 2010, 07:47:36 AM

I dont see how we can deport them and make that work financially.Id just cut out ALL government help for them.If you cant prove citiczenship,no school,no medical,no aid at all.Shut the borders completely down.If an illegal can make it here with no government assistance,they can stay.

Hmmm. I cant believe i agree with you. Definitly the most efficient way to get them to leave or get their papers in order fast. Why should we pay to send em back??? They can walk back the same way they walked in......

240 is Back · « **Reply #37 on:** July 12, 2010, 08:35:25 PM »

I don't like any politican who, when asked what his/her policy would be, responds with "Whatever it takes!"

Cause on those rare instances when they are pressed further - they have to actually give an answer with facts and details.

palin does this here - and while we've heard her rally cry against Amnesty the last 18 months straight... it turns out she supports amnesty. She's not throwing anyone out. She'll let them stay and be legal - but only if they fill out paperwork.

I admire the politicians like Thune and Christie who tell the truth - with details, and not catch phrases. Now, every time I hear a politician say their response would have been "Whatever it takes!" I know they're full of shit.

Actually, OReilly called out Palin for her Obama oil criticism. She said she offered her help to obama, for Obama to call her. Oreilly said, "Well, what would you do to fix it?" Her response was "let other countries fix it". On that date, Obama already had foreign ships in there skimming the oil.

I admire BillO for this. I doubt palin will be on his show too much... she gets Qs that aren't softballs allowing her to vague stump speech.

240 is Back · « **Reply #38 on:** July 12, 2010, 08:58:48 PM »

I'm watching OReilly tonight... he continues to hammer Palin. He read 2 letters about her - and I'm betting they reflect his thinking (as his emails usually are).

The first letter? "Palin's lack of any real immigration plan disappointed me"

The second letter? "Palin should be the next RNC Chief"

Great idea here?

War-Horse · « **Reply #39 on:** July 14, 2010, 07:05:16 PM »

Yeah it feels weird to watch billo put a decent question out there......I kindof felt some respect for a moment or two. Palin is a damned airhead with NO THOUGHTS of her own.
I hate michele bachman also but at least when she says crazy ass stuff you feel she belives it..!! Palin doesnt know what she believes much less how to get there......... $:-\$

240 is Back · « **Reply #40 on:** July 14, 2010, 07:49:16 PM »

Quote from: War-Horse on July 14, 2010, 07:05:16 PM

Yeah it feels weird to watch billo put a decent question out there......I kindof felt some respect for a moment or two. Palin is a damned airhead with NO THOUGHTS of her own.
I hate michele bachman also but at least when she says crazy ass stuff you feel she belives it..!! Palin doesnt know what she believes much less how to get there......... $:-\$

you make a good point. Bachmann says some silly things - but she TRULY believes in very small govt and the constitution. She's a little nutty with the religion, but you are right - those are her thoughts. She's got original thoughts.

Palin's biggest prob is this.... most of us know our weak areas. We don't claim to know it all. She doesn't seem to have this sense. She acts like she has all the answers. Every time she is asked about specifics, she is without a clue, or she describes a policy that is clearly what the dems want too.... her BP solution? Obama was already doing it. Her border solution? Exactly what obama wants. She's a RINO fellahs.

Danny · « **Reply #41 on:** July 14, 2010, 07:49:34 PM »

Quote from: War-Horse on July 14, 2010, 07:05:16 PM

Yeah it feels weird to watch billo put a decent question out there......I kindof felt some respect for a moment or two. Palin is a damned airhead with NO THOUGHTS of her own.
I hate michele bachman also but at least when she says crazy ass stuff you feel she belives it..!! Palin doesnt know what she believes much less how to get there......... $:-\$

I never thought I'd say this but O'Reilly gets my respect for taking it to her twice in the last couple of weeks and exposing her lack of any substance. I'm starting to think even O'Reilly might have some concerns about her ability to lead and see what a catastrophe this would be if she runs so he's probably trying to give his audiences a real feel of what she is and what she would bring to the table...without that "media filter" or liberal bias.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #42 on:** July 14, 2010, 07:57:47 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on July 14, 2010, 07:49:16 PM

you make a good point. Bachmann says some silly things - but she TRULY believes in very small govt and the constitution. She's a little nutty with the religion, but you are right - those are her thoughts. She's got original thoughts.

Palin's biggest prob is this.... most of us know our weak areas. We don't claim to know it all. She doesn't seem to have this sense. She acts like she has all the answers. Every time she is asked about specifics, she is without a clue, or she describes a policy that is clearly what the dems want too.... her BP solution? Obama was already doing it. Her border solution? Exactly what obama wants. She's a RINO fellahs.

I like Michele Bachman more than Palin. Bachman has balls and calls it like it is.

240 is Back · « **Reply #43 on:** July 14, 2010, 08:00:27 PM »

Quote from: Danny on July 14, 2010, 07:49:34 PM

I never thought I'd say this but O'Reilly gets my respect for taking it to her twice in the last couple of weeks and exposing her lack of any substance. I'm starting to think even O'Reilly might have some concerns about her ability to lead and see what a catastrophe this would be if she runs so he's probably trying to give his audiences a real feel of what she is and what she would bring to the table...without that "media filter" or liberal bias.

I don't see him as "taking it to her". Rather, he simply asks her for HER solutions to two of today's biggest crisises. Her first response was automatic "Obama needs to call ME for solutions" and "whatever it takes on amnesty!"

OReilly said "Okay, but what does that mean? What SPECIFIC actions would you use in the Gulf, and what speficially would you do for amnesty?"

From there, in her own words... she gave us her solution to oil spill (which was exactly what obama was already doing) and her solution to the border (which is EXACTLY what obama is proposing!)

Danny · « **Reply #44 on:** July 14, 2010, 08:11:41 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on July 14, 2010, 08:00:27 PM

I don't see him as "taking it to her". Rather, he simply asks her for HER solutions to two of today's biggest crisises. Her first response was automatic "Obama needs to call ME for solutions" and "whatever it takes on amnesty!"

OReilly said "Okay, but what does that mean? What SPECIFIC actions would you use in the Gulf, and what speficially would you do for amnesty?"

From there, in her own words... she gave us her solution to oil spill (which was exactly what obama was already doing) and her solution to the border (which is EXACTLY what obama is proposing!)

I agree basically he asked her to state her opinions and give some specific answers to a couple of situations she claimed she had answers for. But you can't ignore he wasn't throwing her softballs like "last night I wrote in my diary I was so excited about meeting Sarah Palin" Glenn Beck

240 is Back · « **Reply #45 on:** July 14, 2010, 08:31:09 PM »

Quote from: Danny on July 14, 2010, 08:11:41 PM

I agree basically he asked her to state her opinions and give some specific answers to a couple of situations she claimed she had answers for. But you can't ignore he wasn't throwing her softballs like "last night I wrote in my diary I was so excited about meeting Sarah Palin" Glenn Beck

yeah, but beck doesn't always throw softballs. He asked her "who was your favorite founding father" and she stumbled on that one...

Then again, that's a softball too, I guess.

Either way... i really hope she doesn't run in 2012, but I think she will. She's running "mama grizzlie" commercials for her PAC... at this point it's not about getting candidates elected - it's about getting her name out there for Iowa primaries.

And yes, when the 2012 hopefuls made their nov/dec 2009 Iowa trips - Pataki, Huck, Pawlenty... palin showed up too