« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Phil Heath's Arms: Officially too big?  (Read 12519 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79864
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Phil Heath's Arms: Officially too big?
« Reply #50 on: September 02, 2010, 04:39:26 PM »
Quote from: Immortal_Technique on September 02, 2010, 03:17:20 PM
Iron age BBs all had huge arms and small quads.

Not all of them and compared to what? today's guys?
Logged

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: Phil Heath's Arms: Officially too big?
« Reply #51 on: September 02, 2010, 04:41:39 PM »
he looks comical with that narrow chest. what a weird build.
Logged

Flexb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2975
  • word
Re: Phil Heath's Arms: Officially too big?
« Reply #52 on: September 02, 2010, 04:45:34 PM »


Barbapoppaism
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Phil Heath's Arms: Officially too big?
« Reply #53 on: September 02, 2010, 05:16:37 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on September 02, 2010, 04:39:26 PM
Not all of them and compared to what? today's guys?
There was a pic in the Musclemag coverage of the 1997 Arnold, Flex was standing relaxed, with is hands on his hip, one of the most awesome shots of him.
Logged

Sir Bigness

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
  • Get busy Living, or get busy Dying!!
Re: Phil Heath's Arms: Officially too big?
« Reply #54 on: September 02, 2010, 06:43:28 PM »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »