If you are intentionally implementing policy that is damaging to the free-market and contrary to free-market principles, if you're implementing policy that is the exact opposite of free-market principles in order to have a new system in place, what else would you call it besides trying to destroy the current system?
well we could argue for days over free market priciples so i wont get into that but to me its not just basic economics but
basic freaking common sense that in order to stabilize something you need to hold as many things constant as possible until it stabilizes and then promote your agenda...
obama has done nothing but inject uncertainty and destabilize the buisiness world right now.
Health care reform could have been addressed after the economy got back on track, cap/trade didnt even need to be mentioned as it has injected uncertainty into the business world, finreg which still has no details should have at the very least been fully written at the time of being passed but could have been addressed later, taxes needed to be frozen for the time being on both businesses and personal income, the new basal agreement which obama didnt have anything to do with but that as well hurt the stability of the market and lending...
obama has either intentionally or unknowingly put his agenda infront of the wellfare of the american ppl...that to me is completely unacceptable and anybody who voted for this person should be out right disgusted by this and looking for a new candidate.