Author Topic: Operation Northwoods (Read 13513 times)

Mons Venus · « **Reply #25 on:** November 30, 2010, 02:52:38 PM »

Quote from: loco on November 30, 2010, 05:54:35 AM

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag operation plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation[/b], which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington."

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/index.html

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf

Bump for ~~Benny~~ 333456!

OzmO · « **Reply #26 on:** November 30, 2010, 03:17:30 PM »

Quote from: SAMSON123 on November 30, 2010, 02:37:06 PM

Yes...somehow you are missing that in 2001 a FALSE FLAG was perpetrated that led america to attack INNOCENT Iraq and Afghanistan so it could steal its natural resources: Oil, Gas, Copper, Opium/Heroin and Gold...not to mention the strategic location

That would be flawed logic. Just because there was a desire for a false flag in 1962 doesnt mean 911 was a False flag.

You see that's why CT'ers are often ridiculed, because they use arguments like that.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #27 on:** November 30, 2010, 03:22:20 PM »

Quote from: SAMSON123 on November 30, 2010, 08:41:53 AM

Wait a minute...wait a minute. I have posted this information a THOUSAND TIMES and was labeled a CT nut (thankfully there is a CT board for my nutjob posts ) Nonetheless when I would post this info I would be laughed at, then ridiculed, then agreed with. I am glad you all are starting to see the light as I put this post up in threads to 911 and as proof of americas FALSE FLAG techniques. Once again glad to see you all seeing the light...

Pip Pip and carry on...

shut your stupid stanking fly trap you retarded pile of shit.

SAMSON123 · « **Reply #28 on:** November 30, 2010, 03:24:37 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on November 30, 2010, 03:22:20 PM

shut your stupid stanking fly trap you retarded pile of shit.

Well Well well if it isn't the angry white inbred retard of GB setting the example of how a moderator conducts himself on the board. You can reduce your frustrations in life if you just stop looking in the mirror.

George Whorewell · « **Reply #29 on:** November 30, 2010, 03:26:02 PM »

Samson, switch to Jag when you want to insult people. You seem slightly smarter when you adopt that alter ego.

SAMSON123 · « **Reply #30 on:** November 30, 2010, 03:34:31 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on November 30, 2010, 03:17:30 PM

That would be flawed logic. Just because there was a desire for a false flag in 1962 doesnt mean 911 was a False flag.

You see that's why CT'ers are often ridiculed, because they use arguments like that.

Your logic is not logic at all, but something you concocted to justify your belief.

The fact that in 1962 the american government would sit down and write out a scenario of attacking an innocent nation based upon not only on lies it would tell about a nation, but that it would also stage the explosion of a commercial jet liner, stage a fake invasion attack in Florida etc etc and blame it on Cuba. This is the same thing that was done on 911. Staged airliner attacks, controlled demolition of towers, WTC 7 & the Pentagon as well as a FAKE plane crash in Shakesville (no airplane parts) as justification for the wars you see happening in Iraq and Afghanistan today...and all of this supposedly to capture a 6' 5" man dressed in white robes, who is a CIA operative by the name of Tim Osman (Osama Bin Laden) who is hooked to a dialysis machine and supposedly a terrorist.

Yeah you're right Ozzy there is no comparison

OzmO · « **Reply #31 on:** November 30, 2010, 03:48:41 PM »

Quote from: SAMSON123 on November 30, 2010, 03:34:31 PM

Your logic is not logic at all, but something you concocted to justify your belief.

The fact that in 1962 the american government would sit down and write out a scenario of attacking an innocent nation based upon not only on lies it would tell about a nation, but that it would also stage the explosion of a commercial jet liner, stage a fake invasion attack in Florida etc etc and blame it on Cuba. This is the same thing that was done on 911. Staged airliner attacks, controlled demolition of towers, WTC 7 & the Pentagon as well as a FAKE plane crash in Shakesville (no airplane parts) as justification for the wars you see happening in Iraq and Afghanistan today...and all of this supposedly to capture a 6' 5" man dressed in white robes, who is a CIA operative by the name of Tim Osman (Osama Bin Laden) who is hooked to a dialysis machine and supposedly a terrorist.

Yeah you're right Ozzy there is no comparison

I am not arguing 911 here. Did you know we have a whole other board for that?

I am only saying that just because Northwoods is true doesn't mean 911 is.

An argument might be that because some people in the military in 1962 wanted to use a false flag op to start a war then there might be people in the military in 2001, 40 years later who also wanted to do the same thing. However, that doesn't make or prove a 911 CT.

George Whorewell · « **Reply #32 on:** November 30, 2010, 03:53:30 PM »

Ozmo may be onto something. Lundgrenisgod sucked cock and watched gay porn before-- but that doesn't mean he's gay.

SAMSON123 · « **Reply #33 on:** November 30, 2010, 04:06:35 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on November 30, 2010, 03:48:41 PM

I am not arguing 911 here. Did you know we have a whole other board for that?

I am only saying that just because Northwoods is true doesn't mean 911 is.

An argument might be that because some people in the military in 1962 wanted to use a false flag op to start a war then there might be people in the military in 2001, 40 years later who also wanted to do the same thing. However, that doesn't make or prove a 911 CT.

You mean the fact that movies were made about the destruction of the WTC months and a few years before it happened and the producers of those movies all said the CIA came to them and suggested they make movies of this theme is not reason to raise an eyebrow? How about the PNAC document written about the need for a New Pearl Harbor, which by the way was another STAGED event or the fact on 911 so many MILITARY/SAFETY FAILURES happened so conveniently and so much info about the day is labeled as CLASSIFIED? So many people DEAD who knew about what was happening or were victims of the event? Ya gotta admit Oz that there is a whole hellava lot of info saying it was STAGED than it being an honest event. BTW can someone please tell me how 9 of the 19 hijackers are still alive if the planes they were on crashed into the towers, Pentagon and Shakesville?

OzmO · « **Reply #34 on:** November 30, 2010, 05:00:54 PM »

Quote from: SAMSON123 on November 30, 2010, 04:06:35 PM

You mean the fact that movies were made about the destruction of the WTC months and a few years before it happened and the producers of those movies all said the CIA came to them and suggested they make movies of this theme is not reason to raise an eyebrow? How about the PNAC document written about the need for a New Pearl Harbor, which by the way was another STAGED event or the fact on 911 so many MILITARY/SAFETY FAILURES happened so conveniently and so much info about the day is labeled as CLASSIFIED? So many people DEAD who knew about what was happening or were victims of the event? Ya gotta admit Oz that there is a whole hellava lot of info saying it was STAGED than it being an honest event. BTW can someone please tell me how 9 of the 19 hijackers are still alive if the planes they were on crashed into the towers, Pentagon and Shakesville?

Are you not reading what i am saying?

Red Herring: Raising an issue or challenge that is not relevant or is simply a distraction from the issue at hand. The issue being my argument you responded to.

Why are you doing that? Or did you just misread my post?

SAMSON123 · « **Reply #35 on:** November 30, 2010, 09:43:25 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on November 30, 2010, 05:00:54 PM

Are you not reading what i am saying?

Red Herring: Raising an issue or challenge that is not relevant or is simply a distraction from the issue at hand. The issue being my argument you responded to.

Why are you doing that? Or did you just misread my post?

I read and understand your post, but you are ignoring the relationship between the two events that i made. I am NOT trying to prove 911...that is already undertood, I am trying to make you see the METHOD OF OPERATION of your government in getting what it wants. In 1962 it was creating the justification to attack Cuba to claim it as its own...in 2001 it was justification to attack Iraq/Afghanistan to claim its resources as its own. You commented in another thread that Iraq and Afghanistan are essentially owned by america now.... and that was americas goal all along.

Mons Venus · « **Reply #36 on:** December 01, 2010, 05:33:27 AM »

Quote from: loco on November 30, 2010, 05:54:35 AM

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag operation plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington."

Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/index.html

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf

*BUMP* for ~~Benny's~~ 333456 response.