Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
December 22, 2014, 01:44:35 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman - 1999 Mr. Olympia Very Rare Pics  (Read 5397 times)
Figo
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8106



« Reply #25 on: June 25, 2012, 03:25:53 AM »

In a nutshell alot would say a Prime Yates was better, alot would say a Prime Coleman was Better, in this Particular Comparison Opinions will again vairy on who is better.

Yates does look phenomenal in that pic

But where would you place nasser in the grand scheme of things?
Report to moderator   Logged
johnny1
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1788



« Reply #26 on: June 26, 2012, 02:11:34 AM »

Yates does look phenomenal in that pic

But where would you place nasser in the grand scheme of things?
if you are making Reference to where would i place Nasser @ his best vs a Prime Coleman and Prime Yates... behind them both.... Due to Structural issues and the Obvious from the back, Great Bber @ his Best Massive, huge, etc, just not on Coleman's or Yates level keeping in mind we are talking about there Primes.  


* 1996 doz st.jpg (25.31 KB, 270x493 - viewed 937 times.)

* 1998ronny freak.jpg (49.45 KB, 359x514 - viewed 895 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
Hulkster
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22580


ND ran away from me


« Reply #27 on: June 30, 2012, 06:13:45 AM »

another insane shot from 99: Shocked


* 1nDeOb6P50l4U5VVMmgmY4Z83AI4418.jpg (302.67 KB, 1200x1472 - viewed 935 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged

Flower Boy Ran Away
Jaime
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4943


North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.


« Reply #28 on: June 30, 2012, 07:08:15 AM »

Ronnie, Dorian, Phil, Jay, all have huge structural flaws.

I'm trying to think who the most structurally sound Mr.O was, maybe Oliva or Zane.
Report to moderator   Logged

Trans Milkshake.
hazbin
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4694


WWW
« Reply #29 on: June 30, 2012, 08:35:10 AM »

Ronnie, Dorian, Phil, Jay, all have huge structural flaws.

I'm trying to think who the most structurally sound Mr.O was, maybe Oliva or Zane.

for pure symmetry it may be Samir.
Report to moderator   Logged
PJim
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3410


I took my potatoes down to be mashed.


« Reply #30 on: June 30, 2012, 11:44:55 AM »

Ronnie, Dorian, Phil, Jay, all have huge structural flaws.

I'm trying to think who the most structurally sound Mr.O was, maybe Oliva or Zane.

Oliva? No chance.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pet shop boys
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5266

Getbig!


« Reply #31 on: June 30, 2012, 02:24:03 PM »

Sergio some 41 years ago !!!



WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH


* Sergio-so203.jpg (107.93 KB, 418x725 - viewed 735 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
Pet shop boys
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5266

Getbig!


« Reply #32 on: June 30, 2012, 02:25:05 PM »

Rockell !


WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHH


* watermark5.jpg (47.08 KB, 800x600 - viewed 747 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
johnny1
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1788



« Reply #33 on: June 30, 2012, 05:35:37 PM »

another insane shot from 99: Shocked
Yip one of the all time best right there, 98 imo just edges this shot due to paper thin skin that year


* 98bestshape.jpg (81.01 KB, 639x465 - viewed 721 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
Hulkster
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22580


ND ran away from me


« Reply #34 on: June 30, 2012, 07:34:06 PM »

Yip one of the all time best right there, 98 imo just edges this shot due to paper thin skin that year

the thing when comparing ronnie 98 to 99 was that ronnie's quads were 10x better in 99.

bigger, fuller with way more sweep and most importantly, cuts:

his quads never looked this good in 98, which is why I think 99 has a big advantage:

he had the best quads onstage in 99.

probably not in 98


* 1999-mr-olympia-230_20090921_2054078188.jpg (92.22 KB, 799x489 - viewed 755 times.)

* vlcsnap-00002.jpg (66.77 KB, 720x540 - viewed 861 times.)

* vlcsnap-00020.jpg (27.9 KB, 680x510 - viewed 667 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged

Flower Boy Ran Away
johnny1
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1788



« Reply #35 on: June 30, 2012, 08:11:09 PM »

No he did have the Best Quads onstage @ the 98 Olympia, his Quad flare when FULLY flexed was Exceptional, dry, conditioned, paperthin skin etc his OVERALL Condition was Sharper than 99....imo he was @ his absolute best in 98, his Quads were exceptional That year as in they didnt over power the balance with calves as much as they did from 99 onwards, imo he was @ his Best that year and carried that amount of BW better than any other year under 250lbs, Massive, Conditioned and more importantly @ that stage as BALANCED as he ever was that day, that night in 1998 he was as good as it got before he went Mad with "size" if you want a Legit argument against Yates...1998 would be the year imo simply because he was still @ that point BALANCED with the outrageous OVERALL Condition needed to topple a Prime Yates.


* 98sidechest.JPG (29.96 KB, 291x460 - viewed 645 times.)

* 98colemanbest.jpg (33.14 KB, 320x542 - viewed 663 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20872


Decepticons! Scramble!


« Reply #36 on: June 30, 2012, 08:15:18 PM »

the thing when comparing ronnie 98 to 99 was that ronnie's quads were 10x better in 99.

bigger, fuller with way more sweep and most importantly, cuts:

his quads never looked this good in 98, which is why I think 99 has a big advantage:

he had the best quads onstage in 99.

probably not in 98
Bigger sweep doesnt help Ronnie, it kills his balance even more so.
Why cant you understand that the whole point of having bigger quads is worthless if the calves dont grow to match?
Report to moderator   Logged
che
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 13478



« Reply #37 on: June 30, 2012, 08:21:18 PM »

Bigger sweep doesnt help Ronnie, it kills his balance even more so.
Why cant you understand that the whole point of having bigger quads is worthless if the calves dont grow to match?
I agree


Ronnie quads were horrible.





Report to moderator   Logged
Hulkster
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22580


ND ran away from me


« Reply #38 on: June 30, 2012, 08:27:27 PM »

Bigger sweep doesnt help Ronnie, it kills his balance even more so.
Why cant you understand that the whole point of having bigger quads is worthless if the calves dont grow to match?

why can't you understand that at 257 pounds his calves were in very good proportion to his quads:

 Roll Eyes

this isn't 300 pound ronnie


* rc230.jpg (47.46 KB, 349x800 - viewed 859 times.)

* 1999-mr-olympia-230_20090921_2054078188.jpg (92.22 KB, 799x489 - viewed 642 times.)

* 1999-mr-olympia-46_20090830_1492170661.jpg (95.87 KB, 799x584 - viewed 748 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged

Flower Boy Ran Away
che
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 13478



« Reply #39 on: June 30, 2012, 08:29:59 PM »


Ronnie quads were horrible.



I agree, horrible physique
Report to moderator   Logged
Hulkster
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22580


ND ran away from me


« Reply #40 on: June 30, 2012, 08:32:47 PM »

that was the year he lost

compare to when he was actually good:


* rc104.jpg (65.93 KB, 389x600 - viewed 5047 times.)

* ronniecoleman2_lrg.jpg (29.2 KB, 367x550 - viewed 1306 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged

Flower Boy Ran Away
NeoSeminole
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5587


Ronnie > Dorian


« Reply #41 on: June 30, 2012, 08:40:36 PM »

No he did have the Best Quads onstage @ the 98 Olympia, his Quad flare when FULLY flexed was Exceptional, dry, conditioned, paperthin skin etc his OVERALL Condition was Sharper than 99....imo he was @ his absolute best in 98, his Quads were exceptional That year as in they didnt over power the balance with calves as much as they did from 99 onwards, imo he was @ his Best that year and carried that amount of BW better than any other year under 250lbs, Massive, Conditioned and more importantly @ that stage as BALANCED as he ever was that day, that night in 1998 he was as good as it got before he went Mad with "size" if you want a Legit argument against Yates...1998 would be the year imo simply because he was still @ that point BALANCED with the outrageous OVERALL Condition needed to topple a Prime Yates.

I think he looked better at the 01 ASC than the 98 Mr. Olympia. He was the same weight and had the same conditioning, but his muscles looked fuller.


* 01 ASC - Ronnie MM 1.jpg (136.26 KB, 428x600 - viewed 911 times.)

* 01 ASC - Ronnie RDB 1.jpg (112 KB, 381x600 - viewed 643 times.)

* 01 ASC - Ronnie RLS 1 (Small).jpg (146.13 KB, 457x600 - viewed 665 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
che
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 13478



« Reply #42 on: June 30, 2012, 08:41:31 PM »

that was the year he lost

compare to when he was actually good:

Still look like shit  ,him and Yates ruined bodybuilding.



Report to moderator   Logged
Hulkster
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22580


ND ran away from me


« Reply #43 on: June 30, 2012, 09:22:52 PM »

ronnie looks better than paris here:


* 1999-mr-olympia-117_20090830_1051394205.jpg (74.49 KB, 799x429 - viewed 801 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged

Flower Boy Ran Away
johnny1
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1788



« Reply #44 on: June 30, 2012, 09:33:30 PM »

I think he looked better at the 01 ASC than the 98 Mr. Olympia. He was the same weight and had the same conditioning, but his muscles looked fuller.
Maybe its a close thing those 2 years very close, i go with 98 due to his bf levels/dry/shredded everywhere and from the side, back he was as full as his frame could carry in terms of supporting that sort of weight and keeping his physique in check balance wise, there r u number of contests where he looked bigger or more impressive with very good conditioning, however again imo he was near untouchable in 1998 due to his total conditioning from the front, side and back and his waist was still small and taper spot-on, gyno aside perhaps one of the best physiques ever that year, a 1991 Haney, 1993 Yates and 1998 Coleman on the same stage would be the best of the best too close too call imo and all of them under 260lbs with waists in tact too boot.


* Lee all time bshape.jpg (51.25 KB, 557x500 - viewed 587 times.)

* Haneyyates1991.jpg (59.32 KB, 315x632 - viewed 569 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20872


Decepticons! Scramble!


« Reply #45 on: July 01, 2012, 04:03:04 AM »

why can't you understand that at 257 pounds his calves were in very good proportion to his quads:

 Roll Eyes

this isn't 300 pound ronnie
Uh... what?
He calves are fucking terrible. Just... terrible. The bigger his quads got, the more pronounced his failed calves were. You cant compare his 300 lb self to his 257 lb self and say "Well its better here so its ok", it was still terrible.

Look I think Ronnie is awesome dude but you need to face reality. 99 (as you admitted yourself, his quads blew up) made his imbalance issues 10x worse. There's a reason most people at those shows thought that 98 was his best showing. Youre literally trying to say his bigger quads in 99 are somehow more important than the dryness and balance that he lost. And you also seem to forget that BB shows are judged on a "part by part" basis.
Report to moderator   Logged
Jaime
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4943


North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.


« Reply #46 on: July 01, 2012, 07:16:19 AM »

ronnie looks better than paris here:


Ronnie never looked better than Paris you retard. He had way too many structural flaws and zero flow.
Report to moderator   Logged

Trans Milkshake.
Immortal_Technique
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2025


"It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF


« Reply #47 on: July 01, 2012, 07:48:53 AM »

I agree


Ronnie quads were horrible.







Pointless picture to use, he's clearly on the wrong end of some heinous nerve damage!
Report to moderator   Logged
Hulkster
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22580


ND ran away from me


« Reply #48 on: July 01, 2012, 01:40:03 PM »


Ronnie never looked better than Paris you retard. He had way too many structural flaws and zero flow.

you must be gay

outed.
Report to moderator   Logged

Flower Boy Ran Away
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!