Let's bet accounts as to whether or not its in the book i said it was.Game?
We printed billions trillions and gave it away to lower unemployment. What happened?
Hahaha, too easy. On top of that he can't even wait five minutes for a response. Because, you know, I just love sitting here smashing F5 waiting to see your responses. No, thanks. You didn't bother taking my bet so why should I take yours?
Coward.You accused me of making shit up and won't stand behind your accusation. What a piece of shit. Run bitch run.
Hahahaha, he mad. Someone takes this place awfully seriously (while ignoring that he didn't take my bet
what ever COWARD Here's more:http://www.sba.gov/content/what-sbas-definition-small-business-concernIn the book it talks about business with 50 or fewer employees as employing 25% of the work force. the SBA defines small businesses differently.
I was going to say that the 25% number doesnt sound right and BF seems to have proven my intuition correct...
as for your 2nd question, it depends if they have a forseeable need for personel they will. Problem is to be able to forcast accurately you need to be able to determine the variables and possible/probable outcomes...this administration has take a situation in which it was already difficult to forcast the future of business and done absolutely nothing but inject more uncertainty...if you dont know what your expenses are going to be next month are you going to go out and make a purchase on something that could turn against you if your expenses are higher than you thought?of course not, why would you expect businesses to do the opposite?
He mad.
Ok COWARD, cant stand behind your statements eh? what go are you? run bitch run
Just like you? So mad he doesn't realize he pussyfooted around my bet.
Is this Bushs' fault?
You accused me of making it upBack it up or RUN BITCH RUNwhat bet?
Structurally nothing has changed so printing money and cutting taxes etc are just window dressing until the real problems are dealt with.They won't be though.
To a large extent, yes it is.
What bet? Hahaha. No wonder you're such an Obama devotee. You've got the reading comprehension skills of an inner-city dropout.
The SBA site considers small business differently that what was in the book which they were defined as 50 or less employees.What we don't have is growth. What this article i started with the thread here indicates in my mind, is that the rich getting richer doesn't necessarily mean more jobs.
well you should probably disclose that when you make your claim next time...lol of course not bro b/c there are different ways of increasing net income...increasing revenue...OR CUTTING COSTS!!!!well if youre not increasing revenue, then you need to cut costs...which is what businesses have done over the past so many years, which is why owners can still generate bigger profit while having less employees...
Got back to page one. read slowly. you can do it. be positive. run bitch run
I see me asking if you want to bet your account on the claim. You then played deaf, blind and dumb. www.hookedonphonics.com You and Straw Man should see if they offer group deals.
I thought it was commonly accepted that 50 or less was constituted as a small business. Earlier in the thread, 333333, identified it as that (5-50 employees) so when i read it in this book i figured that was the standard. So when BF posted that link to the sba.gov i figured the same until i started thinking how can something be so inaccurate. So i checked SBA's definition and saw it was different.
