Hey Mal, Straw, 240, Lurker, Andre, Vince, Blacken - Welcome to the Recovery!

[Soul Crusher]

FLASHBACK: A Summer of Recovery
The White House.gov ^ | June 17, 2010 | by Ron Sims, Deputy Secretary HUD




This summer is sure to be a Summer of Economic Recovery.


With tens of thousands of projects funded and millions of Americans on the job today, it’s hard to believe that it’s only been 16 months since President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. And with so many jobs saved and created already, you might think that the Recovery Act’s greatest impact is behind us.


But it’s not.


As the summer heats up, it is becoming clear that it could quite possibly be the most active season yet when it comes to recovering our economy. There are Recovery Act-funded projects breaking ground across the country that are creating quality jobs for Americans and economic growth for businesses, large and small.


I am proud to say that the Recovery Act is working!


(Excerpt) Read more at whitehouse.gov ...



________________________ ________________________ ________________________


LMFAO!!!!

[MCWAY]

The only thing worse than the abject failure of a liberal president, at least in the eyes of the liberal, is the undeniable failure of liberalism itself. To claim Mr. Obama has been a good president no longer even remotely passes the laugh test. Consider the results thus far of the Obama presidency:

Two million-private sector jobs have been lost.

Unemployment jumped from 7.8 to 9.2 percent with a simply terrible 2011 first-quarter economic growth rate of just 0.4 percent.
A record 1 in 7 Americans is on food stamps.

Gasoline prices more than doubled, from $1.83 to $3.74 per gallon.

National debt increased 35 percent, to $14.5 trillion, or $137,000 for each taxpayer.

National unfunded liabilities increased 47 percent, to $114.9 trillion, or a cool $1 million for each taxpayer (and this does not yet include Obamacare).

America is on the verge of losing its AAA credit rating.

What’s worse, and was as easily predictable, is the systematic dishonesty Team Obama unleashed to persuade Americans to tolerate its big-government, collectivist agenda. America is, after all, a center-right nation with nearly 3-to-1 self-described conservatives compared to liberals. How else besides trickery could Mr. Obama further an agenda so unpopular with voters? Witness the dishonesty:

The stimulus would keep unemployment below 8 percent.

Stimulus funds would go to “shovel-ready” jobs.

Obamacare would create 4 million new jobs - 400,000 almost immediately.

You could keep your own doctor.

The president’s mother was denied health insurance.

Obamanomics would mean a “net spending cut.”

So, as the liberal presidency of Mr. Obama becomes increasingly indefensible, the liberal is faced with an unthinkable dilemma: acknowledge the fundamental failure of his collectivist liberal philosophy, which tends toward socialism, or blame its failures on a single man whom, until just recently, the liberal deified.

The conflict between liberal collectivist ideology and its application was easily predictable by anyone who has studied big-government economic failures throughout history, from the collectivist all-stars including Mao’s China, Mussolini’s Italy, Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s Soviet Union to today’s honorable mentions such as Castro’s Cuba or Chavez’s Venezuela. Enforcement of collectivism has always depended on government power, from Stalin’s iron-fisted gulags to Mr. Obama’s mere heavy-handed plan for punitive fines for failure to purchase your government-imposed health insurance. The degree of autocracy may vary, but still the collectivist road to economic ruin is universal.....

In the end, Barack Obama’s failures as president are not because he couldn’t faithfully execute the liberal collectivist philosophy - he ushered in the Obamacare era, after all - his failures are instead because he bought into the failed philosophy in the first place.





http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/2/liberals-unmaking-of-barack-obama/

[Soul Crusher]

The only thing worse than the abject failure of a liberal president, at least in the eyes of the liberal, is the undeniable failure of liberalism itself. To claim Mr. Obama has been a good president no longer even remotely passes the laugh test. Consider the results thus far of the Obama presidency:

Two million-private sector jobs have been lost.

Unemployment jumped from 7.8 to 9.2 percent with a simply terrible 2011 first-quarter economic growth rate of just 0.4 percent.
A record 1 in 7 Americans is on food stamps.

Gasoline prices more than doubled, from $1.83 to $3.74 per gallon.

National debt increased 35 percent, to $14.5 trillion, or $137,000 for each taxpayer.

National unfunded liabilities increased 47 percent, to $114.9 trillion, or a cool $1 million for each taxpayer (and this does not yet include Obamacare).

America is on the verge of losing its AAA credit rating.

What’s worse, and was as easily predictable, is the systematic dishonesty Team Obama unleashed to persuade Americans to tolerate its big-government, collectivist agenda. America is, after all, a center-right nation with nearly 3-to-1 self-described conservatives compared to liberals. How else besides trickery could Mr. Obama further an agenda so unpopular with voters? Witness the dishonesty:

The stimulus would keep unemployment below 8 percent.

Stimulus funds would go to “shovel-ready” jobs.

Obamacare would create 4 million new jobs - 400,000 almost immediately.

You could keep your own doctor.

The president’s mother was denied health insurance.

Obamanomics would mean a “net spending cut.”

So, as the liberal presidency of Mr. Obama becomes increasingly indefensible, the liberal is faced with an unthinkable dilemma: acknowledge the fundamental failure of his collectivist liberal philosophy, which tends toward socialism, or blame its failures on a single man whom, until just recently, the liberal deified.

The conflict between liberal collectivist ideology and its application was easily predictable by anyone who has studied big-government economic failures throughout history, from the collectivist all-stars including Mao’s China, Mussolini’s Italy, Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s Soviet Union to today’s honorable mentions such as Castro’s Cuba or Chavez’s Venezuela. Enforcement of collectivism has always depended on government power, from Stalin’s iron-fisted gulags to Mr. Obama’s mere heavy-handed plan for punitive fines for failure to purchase your government-imposed health insurance. The degree of autocracy may vary, but still the collectivist road to economic ruin is universal.....

In the end, Barack Obama’s failures as president are not because he couldn’t faithfully execute the liberal collectivist philosophy - he ushered in the Obamacare era, after all - his failures are instead because he bought into the failed philosophy in the first place.





http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/2/liberals-unmaking-of-barack-obama/

Doh!!!! 

Like I have said - for the average far leftist to admit failure is probably not going to happen.   They would rather burn the nation to the ground than admit defeat.   

[MCWAY]

Doh!!!! 

Like I have said - for the average far leftist to admit failure is probably not going to happen.   They would rather burn the nation to the ground than admit defeat.   

You missed a member of TK.....then again, he's hiding on the G&O board, afraid to get the lips slapped off his face again.

[Soul Crusher]

YEAH THIS INSPIRES REAL CONFIDENCE! 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/08/04/tapper_peppers_carney_what_is_obama_doing_to_create_jobs.html

[andreisdaman]

Epic projection by the boards resident retard who has been MIA lately...

I didn't mention blacks at all.

I said math is racism.

You automatically mentioned blacks. Thanks for proving my point.

Who is obsessed with race?

what other race are you referring to then you goddamn retard fuck?...Indians???..you know what you meant....and I haven't been on the boards lately due to having to turn in some psychology papers and take some tests..plus computer had a virus...but I know you missed me

[Soul Crusher]

what other race are you referring to then you goddamn retard fuck?...Indians???..you know what you meant....and I haven't been on the boards lately due to having to turn in some psychology papers and take some tests..plus computer had a virus...but I know you missed me

Doing self diagnosis? 

[Option D]

Epic projection by the boards resident retard who has been MIA lately...

I didn't mention blacks at all.

I said math is racism.

You automatically mentioned blacks. Thanks for proving my point.

Who is obsessed with race?

'

Lol its all good...im not worried about race....at the end of the day...Im me.. you're you....I win

[MCWAY]

YEAH THIS INSPIRES REAL CONFIDENCE! 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/08/04/tapper_peppers_carney_what_is_obama_doing_to_create_jobs.html

I read the transcript first. But, it doesn't do it justice. Just listening to Carney stumble, fumble, and mumble (rehashing the same BS that Tapper repeatedly pointed out that Obama's been doing for MONTHS) is slapstick comedy GOLD. It had me in STITCHES!!!

[Soul Crusher]

Todays job data is another sham. 

Record low labor particpation rate, took 200k out of the work force, birth death model, all the new grads still no jobs and not counted.

Hoax and chains at its finest.

[George Whorewell]

'

Lol its all good...im not worried about race....at the end of the day...Im me.. you're you....I win

I wasn't referring to you, I was referring to Andrea.

But since you took time out of your busy day to comment on something I posted, I will humor you.

If you're you, then I win.

The truth never fails.

[George Whorewell]

what other race are you referring to then you goddamn retard fuck?...Indians???..you know what you meant....and I haven't been on the boards lately due to having to turn in some psychology papers and take some tests..plus computer had a virus...but I know you missed me

LMAO @ Psychology papers-- 333 beat me to the punch on that one.

Lets do a diagnosis for the sake of psychological achievement; I said "racism" which does not denote any particular race or ethnicity. Racism comes in many different forms and can be practiced by all people. You automatically assumed that I was targeting a specific group of people. Besides the fact that Indians are not a race, you defined and projected what I meant by "racism" and conjured it up into an expression of your own privately held prejudice. Ergo, you are a racist. 

[Option D]

I wasn't referring to you, I was referring to Andrea.

But since you took time out of your busy day to comment on something I posted, I will humor you.

If you're you, then I win.

The truth never fails.

yeah not as busy today as i have been the last 2 weeks.. but..yeah.. i still win.. i mean..look at me

[Soul Crusher]

yeah not as busy today as i have been the last 2 weeks.. but..yeah.. i still win.. i mean..look at me

Yeah, wearing granny shades like they do at a nursing home.   You win alright. 

[MCWAY]

Todays job data is another sham.  

Record low labor particpation rate, took 200k out of the work force, birth death model, all the new grads still no jobs and not counted.

Hoax and chains at its finest.

Exactly HOW does the unemployment rate drop to 9.1%, when nearly all the states had unemployment rates go up again?

Edit - Never mind! Dario answered it for me on another thread: The unemployment rate fell partly because some unemployed workers stopped looking for work. That means they are no longer counted as unemployed.

[Soul Crusher]

AND THOSE WHO JUST GRADUATED COLLEGE ? ? ? ?   

[Option D]

Yeah, wearing granny shades like they do at a nursing home.   You win alright. 

really bro.. thats your best.. stick to your school girl hyperbole son...

if your best "comeback" is saying i wear YSL shades..then.. yes.. i surely do.

[Soul Crusher]

really bro.. thats your best.. stick to your school girl hyperbole son...

if your best "comeback" is saying i wear YSL shades..then.. yes.. i surely do.

100 percent debt to GDP ratio?

14 Trillion debt?

Lowest labor participation rate on record?

Economy collapse.

 

[George Whorewell]

yeah not as busy today as i have been the last 2 weeks.. but..yeah.. i still win.. i mean..look at me

Not a lot of luxury cars with hubcaps and expensive radio's left unattended today?

I'm sure things will pick up sport.

Don't be so glum. 

[Option D]

Not a lot of luxury cars with hubcaps and expensive radio's left unattended today?

I'm sure things will pick up sport.

Don't be so glum. 

haha.. the mal steal?.. no need son

[Soul Crusher]

haha.. the mal steal?.. no need son

Vicking sunglasses seems more your game. 

[andreisdaman]

Todays job data is another sham. 

Record low labor particpation rate, took 200k out of the work force, birth death model, all the new grads still no jobs and not counted.

Hoax and chains at its finest.

well again..this is why I don't bother arguing with you guys..when the numbers came out last month and were low you guys on here touted them and said it was an indication of Obama's failure.now you citre the same source and now that the numbers are good for Obama, now its a hoax..

THE HYPOCRISY CONTINUES

[andreisdaman]

LMAO @ Psychology papers-- 333 beat me to the punch on that one.

Lets do a diagnosis for the sake of psychological achievement; I said "racism" which does not denote any particular race or ethnicity. Racism comes in many different forms and can be practiced by all people. You automatically assumed that I was targeting a specific group of people. Besides the fact that Indians are not a race, you defined and projected what I meant by "racism" and conjured it up into an expression of your own privately held prejudice. Ergo, you are a racist. 

okay..then what category do Native Americans fall into???...are they caucasian?..black?..Hispanic?..Asian?...tell me

[Soul Crusher]

117 does not evebn cover the amount needed to break even moron! 

[GigantorX]

100 percent debt to GDP ratio?

14 Trillion debt?

Lowest labor participation rate on record?

Economy collapse.

 

You can add to that this: The time a person spends unemployed is now at an historical high of 40.5 weeks.

Wages and hours worked are stagnant as well.