Author Topic: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY  (Read 17957 times)

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #100 on: October 08, 2011, 08:42:00 AM »
Y0U FAGG0TS ARE S0 FUNNY EVEN WHEN I'VE PR0VEN T0 Y0U ALL THAT THEY STAY IN THE 1-3 REP RANGE AND SH0WN Y0U EVIDENCE 0F IT Y0U ALL STILL INSIST THAT 0LY LIFTERS D0 HIGH REP RANGES IN THEIR ASSISTANCE W0RK.


I agree with you bro. You have to take other criteria in to accoint thoigh such as training frequency.
Trans Milkshake.

Secret Stack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1673
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #101 on: October 08, 2011, 11:03:08 AM »
I thought olympic lifters train legs like almost everyday though.

not like they train legs once a week like a bodybuilder, do 3 reps and wait 7 days till they do another session filled with a massive couple of reps. they are conditioned enough to cop a beating everyday, which also plays a major role in leg size.

want to train legs only once a week? you better FUCK!!! and i mean fuck! them up in that once a week that you do so and that means rep ranges from all over the globe in that 1 hour you are there.

Secret Stack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1673
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #102 on: October 08, 2011, 11:07:28 AM »
.......and heres something else also...diet down an olympic weightlifter to the same stage ready bf% as a bodybuilder. you'll notice a couple of things - lots of muscle mass disappear into thin air and most importantly, overall development of the heads of the quads are not all there because of lack of fibres being hit with different rep ranges. femoris, lateral head and tear drop/medial head are NOTHING!!! like a bodybuilder who atttacks all fibres with all rep ranges!

this thread is so fucken fail its unbelievable

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #103 on: October 08, 2011, 11:22:25 AM »
.......and heres something else also...diet down an olympic weightlifter to the same stage ready bf% as a bodybuilder. you'll notice a couple of things - lots of muscle mass disappear into thin air and most importantly, overall development of the heads of the quads are not all there because of lack of fibres being hit with different rep ranges. femoris, lateral head and tear drop/medial head are NOTHING!!! like a bodybuilder who atttacks all fibres with all rep ranges!

this thread is so fucken fail its unbelievable

0H YES.  THIS THREAD WAS SURELY AB0UT H0W AN 0LYMPIC WEIGHTLIFTER W0ULD D0 0N STAGE AGAINST A B0DYBUILDER WHEN HE'S DIETED D0WN AND DEHYDRATED.  ::)

Y0UR READING C0MPREHENSI0N IS THAT 0F A 3RD GRADER. AND T0 P0INT 0UT H0W LITTLE Y0U KN0W AB0UT 0LYMPIC WEIGHTLIFTING. THE GUYS BEL0W 105 KGS ARE EXTREMLY LEAN AS THEY NEED T0 MAKE WEIGHT. 0N T0P 0F BEING SINGLE DIGIT B0DY FAT THEY ALS0  CUT WATER WEIGHT.

Xerxes

  • Guest
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #104 on: October 08, 2011, 11:23:56 AM »
So much broscience in this thread, my head hurts

Why can you not refute asbrus in a logical manner?

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #105 on: October 08, 2011, 11:24:22 AM »
I thought olympic lifters train legs like almost everyday though.

not like they train legs once a week like a bodybuilder, do 3 reps and wait 7 days till they do another session filled with a massive couple of reps. they are conditioned enough to cop a beating everyday, which also plays a major role in leg size.

want to train legs only once a week? you better FUCK!!! and i mean fuck! them up in that once a week that you do so and that means rep ranges from all over the globe in that 1 hour you are there.

C0MPLETLY IRRELVANT. I MADE THIS THREAD T0 P0INT 0UT THAT 0LYMPIC LIFTERS TRAIN IN THE 1-3 REP RANGE AND HAVE MASSIVE LEGS. N0 WHERE DID I MENTI0N H0W MANY TIMES A WEEK THEY TRAIN AND THEIR PERCENTGE W0RKL0ADS.  THAT'S A C0MPLETLY DIFFERENT T0PIC.

WHAT D0ES THIS HAVE T0 D0 WITH MY THREAD. 0H WAIT I'LL TELL Y0U N0THING. SECRET STACK Y0U ARE 0NE DUMB S0N 0F A BITCH. N0T GTF0 0UT 0F MY THREAD. THANKS  ;)

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #106 on: October 08, 2011, 11:25:41 AM »

I agree with you bro. You have to take other criteria in to accoint thoigh such as training frequency.

I'M SURPRISED. Y0U'RE THE 0NLY GUY WH0 ACTUALLY UNDERST00D WHAT MY THREAD WAS AB0UT.

apply85

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3833
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #107 on: October 08, 2011, 11:41:41 AM »
asbrus, people are gonna call you delusional, but I'm gonna call you resilient, even though you're kinda stupid for arguing with coach about training because he's probably contributed to the development of a few olympic athletes, but I like your fortitude. Ur still a liar and have smaller legs than me though I'm natural lol

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #108 on: October 08, 2011, 11:44:53 AM »
asbrus, people are gonna call you delusional, but I'm gonna call you resilient, even though you're kinda stupid for arguing with coach about training because he's probably contributed to the development of a few olympic athletes, but I like your fortitude. Ur still a liar and have smaller legs than me though I'm natural lol

THAT'S IMP0SSIBLE. N0 0NE HAS SMALLER LEGS THAN Y0U AT Y0UR PETITE BUILD.

Secret Stack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1673
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #109 on: October 08, 2011, 11:52:16 AM »
0H YES.  THIS THREAD WAS SURELY AB0UT H0W AN 0LYMPIC WEIGHTLIFTER W0ULD D0 0N STAGE AGAINST A B0DYBUILDER WHEN HE'S DIETED D0WN AND DEHYDRATED.  ::)

well...of course it isnt exactly, but the comparison still stands in that both at a single digit bf%, one would show a greater development than the other. anyone can get what was meant here. not you?

it is about muscle being built, right? or just bloofy poofy leg swelling from doing 3 rep squats everyday?

whats underneath the skin? which is where my argument stands in bringing down these guys to the same bf% as a stage ready bodybuilder...that there is NO comparison in leg development.

your ass is so much more bruised after the raping it has been receiving in this thread.

apply85

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3833
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #110 on: October 08, 2011, 11:53:41 AM »
I have quite big thighs, I weigh 140 now so not that small. For instance I'm wearing 29 inch waist pants right now, and I can fit 3 fingers in the between the pants and my waist, but it's my thighs and ass that hold up the pants. On the thighs my pants are skin tight.

What I was gonna say is that the reason olympic lifters do 1-3 rep exercises is they are practicing what they are gonna do to win the gold medal, which is to lift the greatest amount of weight possible. THey are just practicing, trying to get their movments to be efficient which will help to get that weight up, but the muscle growth and strength most likely comes from when they are doing lower weight exercises. I mean, this is my experience in the gym, when I was getting back into shape I could do only a couple pull ups, but by doing close grip pull downs with much less weight than my body weight, I could do 8-10 pull ups when I went back to the pull up bar. Was I doing less weight but it improved my strength in pull ups, the chance of olympic lifters ONLY doing 1-3 reps on their exercises is 0 on any lift, that is such a dumb idea

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #111 on: October 08, 2011, 11:57:37 AM »
I have quite big thighs, I weigh 140 now so not that small. For instance I'm wearing 29 inch waist pants right now, and I can fit 3 fingers in the between the pants and my waist, but it's my thighs and ass that hold up the pants. On the thighs my pants are skin tight.

What I was gonna say is that the reason olympic lifters do 1-3 rep exercises is they are practicing what they are gonna do to win the gold medal, which is to lift the greatest amount of weight possible. THey are just practicing, trying to get their movments to be efficient which will help to get that weight up, but the muscle growth and strength most likely comes from when they are doing lower weight exercises. I mean, this is my experience in the gym, when I was getting back into shape I could do only a couple pull ups, but by doing close grip pull downs with much less weight than my body weight, I could do 8-10 pull ups when I went back to the pull up bar. Was I doing less weight but it improved my strength in pull ups, the chance of olympic lifters ONLY doing 1-3 reps on their exercises is 0 on any lift, that is such a dumb idea

N0 THEY NEVER G0 AB0VE 3 REPS AS I HAVE PR0VEN IN THIS THREAD AND HAVE MASSIVE LEGS.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42347
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #112 on: October 08, 2011, 11:59:56 AM »
I have quite big thighs, I weigh 140 now so not that small. For instance I'm wearing 29 inch waist pants right now, and I can fit 3 fingers in the between the pants and my waist, but it's my thighs and ass that hold up the pants. On the thighs my pants are skin tight.

Trust me, 140 lbs is not only small, it's tiny. Of course if you are only three feet tall, you might be a well-built midget. I remember weighing 140 a thousand years ago when I was a teenager. I was a totally skinny twink at 5'11". Having a horse and riding everyday built up my thighs a bit too. You'll probably outgrow this condition in a couple of years.

Secret Stack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1673
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #113 on: October 08, 2011, 12:01:57 PM »
N0 THEY NEVER G0 AB0VE 3 REPS AS I HAVE PR0VEN IN THIS THREAD AND HAVE MASSIVE LEGS.

show me a pic of someone you can PROVE ONLY does 3 reps and has better development than that of someone who targets all fibres with a wide range of rep ranges.

you see the word "legs" isn't just 2 round things below the waist in this sport/cult, assbruise. it is about the devleopment of the muscle UDNERNEATH the skin - the femoris, the lateral head and the medial head.

show us...

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #114 on: October 08, 2011, 12:02:54 PM »
well...of course it isnt exactly, but the comparison still stands in that both at a single digit bf%, one would show a greater development than the other. anyone can get what was meant here. not you?

it is about muscle being built, right? or just bloofy poofy leg swelling from doing 3 rep squats everyday?

whats underneath the skin? which is where my argument stands in bringing down these guys to the same bf% as a stage ready bodybuilder...that there is NO comparison in leg development.

your ass is so much more bruised after the raping it has been receiving in this thread.


THIS PR0VES H0W DUMB Y0U ARE. IN THE B0LD Y0U ARE IMPLYING THAT MUSCLE IS N0T BUILT BUT RATHER A BL00FY P00F LEG FR0M SWELLING? BR0SCIENCE 101 AT IT'S BEST. AND I'VE ALREADY T0LD Y0U BEL0W 105 KGS THEY ARE VERY LEAN AND EVEN CUT WATER WEIGHT T0 MAKE WEIGHT.


S0ME WILL AND S0ME W0N'T. THERE ARE 0LYMPIC LIFTERS THAT HAVE AMAZING QUADS AND BBERS THAT HAVE SHITTY QUADS. EVEN 0FF SEAS0N A L0T 0F AMATEURS LACK THE SIZE THICKNESS 0F A LEAN 0LYMPIC LIFTER IN THE SAME WEIGHT CLASS. BUT AGAIN IRRELVANT T0 MY THREAD AS I WASN'T P0INTING 0UT H0W THEY W0ULD L00K 0N STAGE AGAINST A T0P PR0 BBER DIETED D0WN.

NICE TRY TH0UGH 0N TR0LLING 0NCE AGAIN AND CHANGING THE SUBJECT 0F THIS THREAD T0 H0W WELL WILL AN 0LYMPIC LIFTER D0 0N A BBING STAGE. LMA0.



asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #115 on: October 08, 2011, 12:04:15 PM »
Trust me, 140 lbs is not only small, it's tiny. Of course if you are only three feet tall, you might be a well-built midget. I remember weighing 140 a thousand years ago when I was a teenager. I was a totally skinny twink at 5'11". Having a horse and riding everyday built up my thighs a bit too. You'll probably outgrow this condition in a couple of years.

THIS IS LIKE SAYING THERE'S A MIDGET WITH A BIG C0CK BUT IT'S 0NLY 3 INCHES. YES IT'S BIG F0R A MIDGET BUT STILL VERY TINY T0 THE AVERAGE PERS0N. HE W0N'T 0UT GR0W IT. HE SAID HE STARTED AT 5 8 110 LBS. TH0SE WERE HIS PRE LIFTING STATS. THESE ARE S0ME 0F THE W0RST GENETICS 0N PLANET EARTH.

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #116 on: October 08, 2011, 12:07:20 PM »
show me a pic of someone you can PROVE ONLY does 3 reps and has better development than that of someone who targets all fibres with a wide range of rep ranges.

you see the word "legs" isn't just 2 round things below the waist in this sport/cult, assbruise. it is about the devleopment of the muscle UDNERNEATH the skin - the femoris, the lateral head and the medial head.

show us...

IN MY FIRST P0ST I SAID SURPASSING S0ME AMATEURS AND PR0S. N0 WHERE DID I SAY THEY W0ULD HAVE BETTER DEVEL0PMENT THAN ALL PR0S.  BUT AGAIN MY P0INT WAS THAT 1-3 REPS Y0U CAN BUILD MASS AND GREAT LEGS. EVERY LEAN 185 LBER W0ULD L0VE T0 HAVE PYRR0S WHEELS.

THE SIZE 0F S0ME PR0S HAS N0THING T0 D0 WITH THE REP RANGES BUT THAT PR0 BBERS AND AMATEURS TAKE MUCH LARGE D0SES 0F STER0IDS, GH, AND 0N T0P 0F THAT INSULIN. THIS EXPLAINS WHY THEY CAN STILL SQUAT THEIR B0DY WEIGHT AND GR0W MASSIVE LEGS.  S0 IF ANY0NE HAS THE BL00FY L00K FR0M THEIR LEGS WHICH WILL SHRINK AFTER A M0NTH 0F DECREASING THE D0SAGES IT'S A PR0 BBER AS HAS BEEN ALREADY PR0VEN BEF0RE WITH MANY PR0S WH0 G0 0FF AND SHRINK T0 N0THING.

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #117 on: October 08, 2011, 12:09:05 PM »
You've still got less than a thousand posts...


It would be great if we could stop reading "Assbruise" for the rest of your internship here.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #118 on: October 08, 2011, 12:10:21 PM »
I have quite big thighs, I weigh 140 now so not that small. For instance I'm wearing 29 inch waist pants right now, and I can fit 3 fingers in the between the pants and my waist, but it's my thighs and ass that hold up the pants. On the thighs my pants are skin tight.

What I was gonna say is that the reason olympic lifters do 1-3 rep exercises is they are practicing what they are gonna do to win the gold medal, which is to lift the greatest amount of weight possible. THey are just practicing, trying to get their movments to be efficient which will help to get that weight up, but the muscle growth and strength most likely comes from when they are doing lower weight exercises. I mean, this is my experience in the gym, when I was getting back into shape I could do only a couple pull ups, but by doing close grip pull downs with much less weight than my body weight, I could do 8-10 pull ups when I went back to the pull up bar. Was I doing less weight but it improved my strength in pull ups, the chance of olympic lifters ONLY doing 1-3 reps on their exercises is 0 on any lift, that is such a dumb idea
140? whats your height if you dont mind?

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #119 on: October 08, 2011, 12:13:54 PM »
MY WH0LE P0INT IS THAT  0NE CAN BUILD MASSIVE LEGS IN 1-3 REP RANGE. H0W HARD IS THAT T0 UNDERSTAND?


O.K. then. Why not just say so?


Now you can start an experiment and show us all how you do. Not difficult to understand "before and after" pics.

Secret Stack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1673
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #120 on: October 08, 2011, 12:14:10 PM »
IN MY FIRST P0ST I SAID SURPASSING S0ME AMATEURS AND PR0S. N0 WHERE DID I SAY THEY W0ULD HAVE BETTER DEVEL0PMENT THAN ALL PR0S.  BUT AGAIN MY P0INT WAS THAT 1-3 REPS Y0U CAN BUILD MASS AND GREAT LEGS. EVERY LEAN 185 LBER W0ULD L0VE T0 HAVE PYRR0S WHEELS.

aaah, and so the realization starts to set in now.  ;)

diet down ANYONE of your bulgarian 3 rep army and i'll show you what muscle was built underneath those "massive legs" by sticking to and ONLY sticking to nothing beyond 3 reps.

oh no! i used the word "diet". now he thinks i am "challenging" an olympic lifter to a stage match with a bodybuilder FFS...
call it "peel away the water, skin and fat" then!  ::)

bruise on the ass just got blacker...

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #121 on: October 08, 2011, 12:16:40 PM »
aaah, and so the realization starts to set in now.  ;)

diet down ANYONE of your bulgarian 3 rep army and i'll show you what muscle was built underneath those "massive legs" by sticking to and ONLY sticking to nothing beyond 3 reps.

oh no! i used the word "diet". now he thinks i am "challenging" an olympic lifter to a stage match with a bodybuilder FFS...
call it "peel away the water, skin and fat" then!  ::)

bruise on the ass just got blacker...

L0L AFTER 5 PAGES Y0U FINALLY G0T IT. SIGH Y0U ARE S0 THICK I'VE ALREADY SAID IT 3 TIMES THAT BEL0W 105 KGS THEY ARE JUST AS LEAN AS 0FF SEAS0N PR0S AND AMATEURS AS THEY NEED T0 MAKE WEIGHT AND 0N T0P 0F THAT CUT WATER WEIGHT. T0P LIFTERS BEL0W 105 KGS ARE ALL SINGLE DIGIT B0DY FAT.

SINGLE DIGIT 0LY LIFTERS WITH MASSIVE QUADS NEVER G0ING AB0VE 3 REPS.





Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61613
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #122 on: October 08, 2011, 12:17:03 PM »
Hate to burst your bubble, but o-lifters are not that big, and please don't post me a pic of a super heavy weight o-lifter.

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #123 on: October 08, 2011, 12:19:54 PM »
Hate to burst your bubble, but o-lifters are not that big, and please don't post me a pic of a super heavy weight o-lifter.

C0ACH THE GUYS BEL0W 105 KGS HAVE EXTREMLY LARGE LEGS F0R THEIR SIZE AND NEVER TRAIN AB0VE 3 REPS. THIS IS A FACT. THERE'S REALLY N0THING T0 DEBATE HERE.

Secret Stack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1673
Re: THE MYTH 0F REP RANGES AND HYPERTR0PHY
« Reply #124 on: October 08, 2011, 12:20:06 PM »
SIGH Y0U ARE S0 THICK I'VE ALREADY SAID IT 3 TIMES THAT BEL0W 105 KGS THEY ARE JUST AS LEAN AS 0FF SEAS0N PR0S AND AMATEURS AS THEY NEED T0 MAKE WEIGHT AND 0N T0P 0F THAT CUT WATER WEIGHT. T0P LIFTERS BEL0W 105 KGS ARE ALL SINGLE DIGIT B0DY FAT.

well then post a pic of someone that trains no more than 3 reps for legs and show me how fully developed the 3 main heads of the quad are. post a pic of what someone training ONLY 3 reps looks like...you obviously have seen the pics to be talking about them, so post them up..."sigh"  ::)