Author Topic: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.  (Read 3749 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #25 on: November 27, 2011, 12:31:11 PM »
I post here just to mock you and how pathetic your life is posting over 70000 times.



So who is worse - me - or my stalker? 

xpac2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #26 on: November 27, 2011, 12:58:09 PM »
So who is worse - me - or my stalker? 

You

Hope this helps

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #27 on: November 27, 2011, 12:59:19 PM »
You

Hope this helps

Not really - stalking people on a board you say you dont even like is a lot more telling than my post count.

xpac2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #28 on: November 27, 2011, 01:01:55 PM »
Not really - stalking people on a board you say you dont even like is a lot more telling than my post count.

72811 = You're a fucking loser

Hope this helps  ;D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #29 on: November 28, 2011, 11:33:48 AM »
New Satellite Data Contradicts Carbon Dioxide Climate Theory
Co2insanity.com ^ | 11/15/2011 · 8:11 AM ↓ Jump to Comments | John O’Sullivan



Posted on Monday, November 28, 2011 1:48:24 PM



Industrialized nations emit far less carbon dioxide than the Third World, according to latest evidence from Japan’s Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).

Global warming alarmism is turned on its head and the supposed role of carbon dioxide in climate change may be wrong, if the latest evidence from Japan’s scientists is to be believed.

Japanese national broadcaster, NHK World broke the astonishing story on their main Sunday evening news bulletin (October 30, 2011). Television viewers learned that the country’s groundbreaking IBUKU satellite, launched in June 2009, appears to have scorched an indelible hole in conventional global warming theory.

Standing in front of a telling array of colorful graphs, sober-suited Yasuhiro Sasano, Director of Japan’s National Institute for Environmental Studies told viewers, “The [IBUKU satellite] map is to help us discover how much each region needs to reduce CO2 [carbon dioxide] emissions.”


Industrialized Nations World’s Lowest CO2 ‘Polluters’

Indeed, the map at which JAXA spokesman Sasano was pointing been expected by most experts to show that western nations are to blame for substantial increases in atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide, causing global warming. But to an officious looking TV interviewer Sasano turned greenhouse gas theory on it’s head.

According to UN science the greenhouse gas theory says more CO2 entering the atmosphere will warm the planet, while less CO2 is associated with cooling.

Gesturing to an indelible deep green hue streaked across the United States and Europe viewers were told, “in the high latitudes of the Northern hemisphere emissions were less than absorption levels.”

Sasano proceeded to explain the color-coding system of the iconic maps showing where regions were either absorbing or emitting the trace atmospheric gas. Regions were alternately colored red (for high CO2 emission), white (low or neutral CO2 emissions) and green (no emissions: CO2 absorbers).

Bizarrely, the IBUKU maps prove exactly the opposite of all conventional expectations revealing that the least industrialized regions are the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases on the planet.

Yes, you read that correctly: the U.S. and western European nations are areas where CO2 levels are lowest. This new evidence defies the consensus view promoted by mainstream newspapers, such as the New York Times.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had long claimed that, “there is a consensus among scientists that manmade emissions of greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide (CO2), are harming global climate.”


The Japanese satellite map shows regions colored the deepest leaf green (net absorbers of CO2) being predominantly those developed nations of Europe and North America; thus indicating built up environments absorbed more CO2 than they emitted into the atmosphere.

By contrast the bulk of the regions colored red (so-called ‘carbon polluters’) were in undeveloped, densely forested equatorial regions of Africa and South America.

Huge Headache for Climate Policymakers

JAXA boasts that, “we can reduce the error of the estimated values when we introduce IBUKI’s observation data compared to that of the values calculated in a conventional way based on ground observation data.”

To all policymakers who study the Japanese maps it is apparent that the areas of greatest CO2 emissions are those regions with least human development and most natural vegetation: Equatorial Third World nations.

The Japanese evidence also disproves the often-cited hypothesis that Siberia and other areas of northern Russia were natural vents for large scale CO2 outgassing, exacerbating global warming fears.

 In effect, this compelling new data appears to show that the asphalt and concreted industrial nations are ‘mopping up’ carbon dioxide faster than their manufacturers and consumers can emit it. If this is confirmed, it means a cornerstone of man-made global warming may be in serious doubt.

Can Western Nations Still Proceed with Carbon Taxes?

But now that these so-called “global warming gases” have been precisely measured across the planet the quandary for international policymakers is what to do about plans to further implement international targets for CO2 reduction.


World leaders are getting set to face the latest round of UN climate change talks in Durban next month and must discuss a replacement for the soon to expire Kyoto Protocol, which binds nations to limited CO2 emissions.

The dilemma is whether the established UN global warming policy of the ‘polluter pays’ can any longer be sensibly upheld. Conventional political thinking at previous UN climate conferences was to ‘offset’ carbon emissions by making the worst polluters pay higher ‘carbon taxes.’

But that theory now appears to be rendered redundant being that western economies, believed to be the worst offenders, are in fact, contributing either negligible or no measurable CO2 emissions whatsoever.

Indeed, the IBUKU data indicates that the areas of highest CO2 emissions are precisely those regions with most vegetation and least industry and thus less able to pay.

Thus, the unthinkable could be made real: the greenhouse gas theory of climate change may collapse in the face of empirical evidence that industrialization is shown to have no link to global warming.

For more information the IBUKU achievement is published in the Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere (an online thesis magazine) issued by the Meteorological Society of Japan.

Sources:
JAXA, Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, Greenhouse Gas Observation Satellite ‘IBUKI’ (GOSAT), accessed online: October 30, 2011.

Gillis, J.,’Study Affirms Consensus on Climate Change,’ New York Times, (nytimes.com: accessed online: October 30, 2011)


Copyright. Contact the author to obtain permission for republication.



NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE          www.nationalreview.com           PRINT

Jim Lacey

Archive    |    Log In

November 28, 2011 4:00 A.M.
ABC's Tapper To Carney: Looks Like Obama "Is Campaigning On Taxpayer Dime"


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/28/abcs_tapper_to_carney_looks_like_obama_is_campaigning_on_taxpayer_dime.html




ABC News' Jake Tapper confronts White House press secretary Jay Carney over President Obama's schedule which has included a lot of traveling. Citing a Wall Street Journal article about the number of times President Obama has traveled to swing-states, Tapper bluntly asks Carney if Obama is "campaigning on taxpayer dime."

"President Obama seems to travel to battleground states more so than any other president before him. Am I'm wondering if you could respond to this. It looks like the president is campaigning on the taxpayer dime more than any other president has done," Tapper said at today's White House briefing.

"I reject the premise of that," Carney responded. Carney said since Obama "expanded the political map" by winning some red states, so many more states are considered "purple" or swing-states now. Carney also said that there is "logistical" decision making when the White House plans to travel.

Carney is then asked by CBS News' Mark Knoller if politics isn't the motive then what is, causing the press secretary to give a bumbling answer.






More blame Bush.   What a scam Obama is.   



Scientists Behaving Badly

More nails for the coffin of man-made global warming


Global-warming skeptics spend much of their time knocking down the fatuous warmist claim that the science is settled. According to the warmists, this singular piece of settled science is attested to by hundreds or thousands of highly credentialed scientists. In truth, virtually the entire warmist edifice is built around a small, tightly knit coterie of persons (one hesitates to refer to folks with so little respect for the scientific method as scientists) willing to falsify data and manipulate findings; or, to put it bluntly, to lie in order to push a political agenda not supported by empirical evidence. This is what made the original release of the Climategate e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia so valuable. They clearly identified the politicized core of climate watchers who were driving the entire warmist agenda. Following in their footsteps are all the other scientists who built their own research on top of the fraudulent data produced by the warmist core.

Last week over 5,000 new e-mails, already dubbed Climategate 2, were released. Anyone still desiring to contest the assertion that only a few persons controlled the entire warmist agenda will be brought up short by this note from one warmist protesting that his opinions were not getting the hearing they deserved: “It seems that a few people have a very strong say, and no matter how much talking goes on beforehand, the big decisions are made at the eleventh hour by a select core group.” Over the years this core group, led by Phil Jones at East Anglia and Michael Mann at Penn State, became so close that even those inclined toward more honest appraisals of the state of climate science were hesitant to rock the boat. As one warm-monger states: “I am not convinced that the ‘truth’ is always worth reaching if it is at the cost of damaged personal relationships.” Silly me, how many years have I wasted believing that the very point of science was to pursue the truth in the face of all obstacles. On the basis of this evidence the scientific method must be rewritten so as to state: “Science must be as objective as possible, unless it offends your friends.”

Unfortunately, from the very beginning, the core group at the heart of Climategate had no interest in “scientific truth.” As one states: “The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guide what’s included and what is left out.” In other words, let’s decide on a conclusion and then use only evidence that proves that point, discarding everything else. One scientist who seems to have been slightly troubled by these methods wrote: “I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it, which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.” In another note to Phil Jones, this same scientist complained: “Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest.”

Of course, nothing of the sort was done. As one e-mail states: “The figure you sent is very deceptive . . . there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC [the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change].” Too bad these so-called scientists felt they could tell the truth only to one another and not the public at large. Some of the other truths they shared only with one another are astounding. For instance, one writes: “I find myself in the strange position of being very skeptical of the quality of all present reconstructions, yet sounding like a pro greenhouse zealot here!” So, despite having no confidence in any of the models the IPCC was using in its reports, this scientist was ready to support the IPCC findings to the hilt. And why didn’t he believe the models? Easy: They were designed to tell the big lie. For example, when confronted with the problem that if all the data were included, the warming disappeared, Phil Jones turned to a novel method: He used only “[time] periods that showed warming.”

At one point, Jones admits that the “basic problem is that all of the models are wrong.” Of course, there is a simple reason for this. When the models do not show what the warmists want them to show, they simply apply “some tuning.” One scientist was worried enough about this “tuning” to write that he “doubt[ed] the modeling world will be able to get away with this much longer.” In this case, “tuning” means changing the model until it tells you what you want it to. When it became impossible to torture the models any further without making their uselessness apparent to all, the warmists resorted to changing the data.

The most efficient method of corrupting the models was to use data only from time periods when there was warming and discard others, as Jones admits to doing. This method helped one scientist reduce the cooling in the northern hemisphere between 1940 and 1970, so that he did not have to make up an excuse blaming it on sulphates, which could not be proven. Another complains that no matter how much he fiddles with the data, it is “very difficult to make the Medieval Warming Period go away.” Solving this problem in the modern era was much easier: The warmists merely changed the temperature readings for much of the 20th century and threw away the original data.

Why? One e-mail clearly explains what was at stake: ”I can’t overstate the HUGE amount of political interest in the project as a message that the Government can give on climate change to help them tell their story. They want the story to be a very strong one and don’t want to be made to look foolish.” In other words, all the scientific lying was a result of scientists trying to give their political masters a major issue they could use to control people’s lives and justify wasting trillions of dollars. Success, as one warmist stated, rested on somehow convincing the public that “limate change is extremely complicated, BUT to accept the dominant view that people are affecting it, and that impacts produces risk that needs careful and urgent attention.” In other words, climate science is too complex for the simpleton voters, who must be made to believe that unless we wreck the global economy the planet will bake. As Michael Mann says in one e-mail: “the important thing is to make sure they’re losing the PR battle.” Moving even further away from their original calling as scientists, the warmists spend considerable time discussing the tactics of convincing the masses that global warming should be a major concern. For instance, one states: “Having established scale and urgency, the political challenge is then to turn this from an argument about the cost of cutting emissions — bad politics — to one about the value of a stable climate — much better politics. . . . the most valuable thing to do is to tell the story about abrupt change as vividly as possible.”

To win the public debate nothing was out of bounds. For instance, Mann, incensed that some skeptics had trashed his work, wrote to Jones, saying he had “been talking with folks in the states about finding an investigative journalist to investigate and expose McIntyre . . . perhaps the same needs to be done with this Kennan guy . . . I believe that the only way to stop these people is by exposing them and discrediting them.” Steve McIntyre and Doug Kennan are well-known skeptics. In fact, McIntyre’s work was crucial in proving that Mann’s infamous “hockey stick graph” — the heart of the United Nations’ IPCC-3 report — was a fraud. Rather than contest McIntyre’s findings with evidence and data, Mann decided that his best alternative was to smear his challenger’s reputation. Skeptics always had to be on the watch for Mann’s spiteful attacks. But what is interesting is that many of his fellow warmists had a low opinion of his work. Despite this, they were slow to criticize Mann — partly because they did not want to give the skeptics any more ammunition, but also because they were afraid of him. As one warmist wrote to Jones, Mann was a “serious enemy” and “vindictive.”

Worried that their e-mail discussions might turn a spotlight on their fraud, Jones and others were constantly advising one another on how to hide the evidence. For instance, Jones once sent out an e-mail stating: “I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI [Freedom of Information] Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process.” To which one warmist replied: “Phil, thanks for your thoughts — guarantee there will be no dirty laundry in the open.”

Still, none of this deception would be possible without the active collusion of much of the global press, which has swallowed the warmist agenda hook, line, and sinker. As one BBC journalist wrote to Phil Jones after running a piece slightly skeptical of the warmist position:

I can well understand your unhappiness at our running the other piece. But we are constantly being savaged by the loonies for not giving them any coverage at all, especially as you say with the COP [Conference of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol] in the offing, and being the objective impartial (ho ho) BBC that we are, there is an expectation in some quarters that we will every now and then let them say something. I hope though that the weight of our coverage makes it clear that we think they are talking through their hats.

What is even more troubling is what appears to be the active collusion of government agencies charged with looking out for the public welfare. In one Jones e-mail, he discusses hiding data, making it clear that the U.S. Department of Energy was an active participant in his fraud: “Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get — and has to be well hidden. I’ve discussed this with the main funder (US Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.” I hope someone in Congress is interested in why the Department of Energy was involved in hiding climate data. One might assume that it would be harder to make an investment in Solyndra if the global-warming threat was proven a fraud.

My favorite quote of all those uncovered was from the climate criminal who asked his colleagues what would happen to them if it was discovered that climate change was “mainly a multidecadal natural fluctuation,” as much of the evidence shows. He answers his own question: “They’ll kill us probably.”

— Jim Lacey is professor of strategic studies at the Marine Corps War College. He is the author of the recently released The First Clash and Keep from All Thoughtful Men. The opinions presented here are entirely his own and do not represent those of the Department of Defense or any of its members.
 

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #30 on: November 28, 2011, 07:53:11 PM »
Its sad to watch a human being sink so low

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #31 on: November 28, 2011, 07:54:02 PM »
Its sad to watch a human being sink so low


You actually believe in this scam? 

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #32 on: November 28, 2011, 08:02:41 PM »

You actually believe in this scam? 

Its not a scam its real and its proven only people with an agenda dispute it.

However not using fossil fuels is not an option as the replacements(wind/solar/etc) we have currently simply arent effecient enough.

Global warming is here to stay live with it bitches

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #33 on: November 28, 2011, 08:03:57 PM »
Its not a scam its real and its proven only people with an agenda dispute it.

However not using fossil fuels is not an option as the replacements(wind/solar/etc) we have currently simply arent effecient enough.

Global warming is here to stay live with it bitches


Lol

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #34 on: November 28, 2011, 08:05:52 PM »
Its not a scam its real and its proven only people with an agenda dispute it.

However not using fossil fuels is not an option as the replacements(wind/solar/etc) we have currently simply arent effecient enough.

Global warming is here to stay live with it bitches

If it was "real and proven" then people like Michael Mann would spend more time refuting the dissenters instead of looking to hire snoops to smear them.

Fucking joke. Keep moving the goal posts.

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #35 on: November 28, 2011, 08:08:37 PM »
If it was "real and proven" then people like Michael Mann would spend more time refuting the dissenters instead of looking to hire snoops to smear them.

Fucking joke. Keep moving the goal posts.

Okay its a global conspiracy involving all the top scientists from around the world all setup so Obama can give money to fake companies supporting a liberal agenda. Satisfied?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #36 on: November 28, 2011, 08:12:39 PM »
Okay its a global conspiracy involving all the top scientists from around the world all setup so Obama can give money to fake companies supporting a liberal agenda. Satisfied?

read Creature from Jekyll Island and educate yourself moron.   globalist warming is a scam and a hoax on gullible dupes like yourself to give up liberty, freedom, and be taxed and regulated into slavery. 

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #37 on: November 28, 2011, 08:17:04 PM »
read Creature from Jekyll Island and educate yourself moron.   globalist warming is a scam and a hoax on gullible dupes like yourself to give up liberty, freedom, and be taxed and regulated into slavery. 

Wow just wow...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #38 on: November 28, 2011, 08:18:44 PM »
Wow just wow...

Yes it is.   Read the damn book.   Only a complete idiot buys into this scam. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #39 on: November 29, 2011, 04:32:16 AM »
The Great Global Warming Fizzle The climate religion fades in spasms of anger and twitches of boredom.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203935604577066183761315576.html



 
How do religions die? Generally they don't, which probably explains why there's so little literature on the subject. Zoroastrianism, for instance, lost many of its sacred texts when Alexander sacked Persepolis in 330 B.C., and most Zoroastrians converted to Islam over 1,000 years ago. Yet today old Zoroaster still counts as many as 210,000 followers, including 11,000 in the U.S. Christopher Hitchens might say you can't kill what wasn't there to begin with.

Still, Zeus and Apollo are no longer with us, and neither are Odin and Thor. Among the secular gods, Marx is mostly dead and Freud is totally so. Something did away with them, and it's worth asking what.

Consider the case of global warming, another system of doomsaying prophecy and faith in things unseen.

As with religion, it is presided over by a caste of spectacularly unattractive people pretending to an obscure form of knowledge that promises to make the seas retreat and the winds abate. As with religion, it comes with an elaborate list of virtues, vices and indulgences. As with religion, its claims are often non-falsifiable, hence the convenience of the term "climate change" when thermometers don't oblige the expected trend lines. As with religion, it is harsh toward skeptics, heretics and other "deniers." And as with religion, it is susceptible to the earthly temptations of money, power, politics, arrogance and deceit.

This week, the conclave of global warming's cardinals are meeting in Durban, South Africa, for their 17th conference in as many years. The idea is to come up with a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, which is set to expire next year, and to require rich countries to pony up $100 billion a year to help poor countries cope with the alleged effects of climate change. This is said to be essential because in 2017 global warming becomes "catastrophic and irreversible," according to a recent report by the International Energy Agency.

Yet a funny thing happened on the way to the climate apocalypse. Namely, the financial apocalypse.

The U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada and the EU have all but confirmed they won't be signing on to a new Kyoto. The Chinese and Indians won't make a move unless the West does. The notion that rich (or formerly rich) countries are going to ship $100 billion every year to the Micronesias of the world is risible, especially after they've spent it all on Greece.

Cap and trade is a dead letter in the U.S. Even Europe is having second thoughts about carbon-reduction targets that are decimating the continent's heavy industries and cost an estimated $67 billion a year. "Green" technologies have all proved expensive, environmentally hazardous and wildly unpopular duds.

All this has been enough to put the Durban political agenda on hold for the time being. But religions don't die, and often thrive, when put to the political sidelines. A religion, when not physically extinguished, only dies when it loses faith in itself.

That's where the Climategate emails come in. First released on the eve of the Copenhagen climate summit two years ago and recently updated by a fresh batch, the "hide the decline" emails were an endless source of fun and lurid fascination for those of us who had never been convinced by the global-warming thesis in the first place.

But the real reason they mattered is that they introduced a note of caution into an enterprise whose motivating appeal resided in its increasingly frantic forecasts of catastrophe. Papers were withdrawn; source material re-examined. The Himalayan glaciers, it turned out, weren't going to melt in 30 years. Nobody can say for sure how high the seas are likely to rise—if much at all. Greenland isn't turning green. Florida isn't going anywhere.

The reply global warming alarmists have made to these dislosures is that they did nothing to change the underlying science, and only improved it in particulars. So what to make of the U.N.'s latest supposedly authoritative report on extreme weather events, which is tinged with admissions of doubt and uncertainty? Oddly, the report has left climate activists stuttering with rage at what they call its "watered down" predictions. If nothing else, they understand that any belief system, particularly ones as young as global warming, cannot easily survive more than a few ounces of self-doubt.

Meanwhile, the world marches on. On Sunday, 2,232 days will have elapsed since a category 3 hurricane made landfall in the U.S., the longest period in more than a century that the U.S. has been spared a devastating storm. Great religions are wise enough to avoid marking down the exact date when the world comes to an end. Not so for the foolish religions. Expect Mayan cosmology to take a hit to its reputation when the world doesn't end on Dec. 21, 2012. Expect likewise when global warming turns out to be neither catastrophic nor irreversible come 2017.

And there is this: Religions are sustained in the long run by the consolations of their teachings and the charisma of their leaders. With global warming, we have a religion whose leaders are prone to spasms of anger and whose followers are beginning to twitch with boredom. Perhaps that's another way religions die.

Write to bstephens@wsj.com


whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #40 on: November 29, 2011, 05:57:54 AM »
Yes it is.   Read the damn book.   Only a complete idiot buys into this scam. 

So in order to steal or liberty, freedom and raise taxes they invent a theory that fossil fuels raise the Earths temperature? 
And get 99% of scientists from Asia, US and Europe to support it as a fact?

Pretty complex plan you got there

xpac2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #41 on: November 29, 2011, 06:29:16 AM »
So in order to steal or liberty, freedom and raise taxes they invent a theory that fossil fuels raise the Earths temperature? 
And get 99% of scientists from Asia, US and Europe to support it as a fact?

Pretty complex plan you got there

You'll have to excuse 333666 he's a moron...and probably insane due to his over 70000 posts on an internet bodybuilding forum

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #42 on: November 29, 2011, 06:31:37 AM »
Go away to gay stalking troll.   

xpac2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #43 on: November 29, 2011, 06:37:35 AM »
Go away to gay stalking troll.   

72935

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #44 on: November 29, 2011, 07:09:10 AM »
Palin, Newt, ROmney, Gore, Obama = All idiots who buy into this global warming garbage.

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #45 on: November 29, 2011, 07:42:28 AM »
educate yourself moron.   


Now this is funny from the likes of you

bears

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2195
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #46 on: November 29, 2011, 08:00:24 AM »
So in order to steal or liberty, freedom and raise taxes they invent a theory that fossil fuels raise the Earths temperature? 
And get 99% of scientists from Asia, US and Europe to support it as a fact?

Pretty complex plan you got there

yeah and in 1983 our scientists scoffed at anyone who was saying that the earth wasn't cooling because of us.  Because i mean come on.  It's fucking 1983!  I think we know what we're talking about here.

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #47 on: November 29, 2011, 09:54:02 AM »
You'll have to excuse 333666 he's a moron...and probably insane due to his over 70000 posts on an internet bodybuilding forum

Sure seems like it he aint wright..and all that time on the WEB..seems like a freak

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: More evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
« Reply #48 on: November 29, 2011, 09:58:58 AM »
yeah and in 1983 our scientists scoffed at anyone who was saying that the earth wasn't cooling because of us.  Because i mean come on.  It's fucking 1983!  I think we know what we're talking about here.

I could use the same argument to prove the earth is flat. Please make an effort