Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
February 09, 2016, 08:53:45 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sandy Hook staged?  (Read 26430 times)
The Ugly
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19416



WWW
« Reply #50 on: September 13, 2015, 11:20:46 PM »

Lol snopes?? Isn't that run by two biased individuals? Why do people keep using them for reference. Their true or false claims should be taken with a grain of salt - especially when it concerns conspiracies.

Doesn't matter how biased they are; only thing that matters is the strength and validity of evidence they use to debunk the retards. It's sorta how logic works. Not that your people have any interest in such things, of course.

Ever consider your own biases when asserting such outlandish horseshit?
Report to moderator   Logged
thebrink
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3173



« Reply #51 on: October 04, 2015, 09:01:56 AM »

Please explain how the concrete evidence could be more absurd than internet lies, that foil hat bullshit which doesn't never include any bit of real evidence? I made 6 claims in the comment you just quoted, so why don't you prove even one of those claims to be faulty? Why don't you morons understand that fact is what you can prove, not what you can fart out from your idiotic brains..  Grin

1. There is complete chain of evidence which proves that the autistic moron have an access to the  gun, he bought the ammo etc. which is proven by the facts.
2. There is complete chain of evidence which proves that the autistic moron kill his mother and drive to the school to do the shootings
3. There is complete chain of evidence which proves that the autistic moron were in the school shooting children's, and then himself
4. There is complete chain of evidence which proves that the autistic moron was only shooter, and he killed 27 people.
5. There is zero evidence that there were some other party involved
6. There is zero evidence that there were some kind of conspiracy involving this shooting.
7. There is zero evidence that there was any foul play about this incident, beside the acts of the autistic moron.

Here you are, prove me wrong? It would be fun, isn't it, so why don't you just humiliate crap out of me? BECAUSE YOU CAN'T, THAT'S WHY!  Grin

I don't have to you just did it yourself.
Report to moderator   Logged
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1687


« Reply #52 on: October 04, 2015, 11:15:48 PM »

I don't have to you just did it yourself.

Sad little child, is that all your wit can throw at me? I present you a bunch of concrete facts, and ask you to prove I am wrong, and this is all you are able to say? Well, you couldn't find better way to prove your stupidity even if you try your best.  Grin
Report to moderator   Logged
thebrink
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3173



« Reply #53 on: October 05, 2015, 04:30:39 PM »

Sad little child, is that all your wit can throw at me? I present you a bunch of concrete facts, and ask you to prove I am wrong, and this is all you are able to say? Well, you couldn't find better way to prove your stupidity even if you try your best.  Grin

all you did was type out a bunch of moronic shit that doesn't make any sense once again  Roll Eyes
Report to moderator   Logged
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1687


« Reply #54 on: October 06, 2015, 03:51:04 AM »

all you did was type out a bunch of moronic shit that doesn't make any sense once again  Roll Eyes

It seem to me that you have to blame your ability to understand reality, because you seem to be only one who doesn't understand those facts. You are handbook example of the foil hat moron, who refuses to understand any information, which comes outside of the foil hat ring of crappy theories and utterly bullshit  Grin
Report to moderator   Logged
thebrink
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3173



« Reply #55 on: October 08, 2015, 05:18:18 PM »

It seem to me that you have to blame your ability to understand reality, because you seem to be only one who doesn't understand those facts. You are handbook example of the foil hat moron, who refuses to understand any information, which comes outside of the foil hat ring of crappy theories and utterly bullshit  Grin

I never said anything about Sandy hook being fake in the first place idiot.  Roll Eyes

I'm simply laughing at your embarrassing inability to believe governments are notoriously dangerous for deceiving sycophants like you, which is really the reason why they are able to get away with what they do.





* tv charles frith.jpg (39.61 KB, 749x450 - viewed 137 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
The Ugly
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19416



WWW
« Reply #56 on: October 08, 2015, 10:25:30 PM »

I never said anything about Sandy hook being fake in the first place idiot.  Roll Eyes

I'm simply laughing at your embarrassing inability to believe governments are notoriously dangerous for deceiving sycophants like you, which is really the reason why they are able to get away with what they do.

Always seems to hinge on this supposition. Does the argument fall apart if the other guy distrusts gubment, too?
Report to moderator   Logged
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1687


« Reply #57 on: October 09, 2015, 12:55:49 AM »

I never said anything about Sandy hook being fake in the first place idiot.  Roll Eyes

I'm simply laughing at your embarrassing inability to believe governments are notoriously dangerous for deceiving sycophants like you, which is really the reason why they are able to get away with what they do.


So, let put it this way so even the stupidest moron will understand: What people should believe?

1. Moronic and utterly stupid foil hat theory, which doesn't include even a single evidence about the matter, but instead of that, it is full of stupid lies and fake evidence, presented by bunch of mentally ill children's?

2. Completely proved case of criminal investigation with a tons of real and concrete evidence presented by professional investigators and scientists?

With your own words, explain this difficult thing to me?

You see, believing any fucking theory which hasn't been proven, is just plain stupidity. That's why I believe only the facts, no matter whose facts they are. Sadly, foil hats haven't present any, so there is only facts presented by official source. Is this simple enough for you to understand? When some different source start to present facts, I adopt them if they are based on real evidence. Never seen that to happen..
Report to moderator   Logged
thebrink
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3173



« Reply #58 on: October 09, 2015, 01:46:27 PM »

Always seems to hinge on this supposition. Does the argument fall apart if the other guy distrusts gubment, too?

Hinges on the stupidity of the gullible sycophant trusting the deceptive psychopath. The sycophant knows nothing more but to have complete trust in the one who is hand feeding them regardless if it's poison or not.
Report to moderator   Logged
The Ugly
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19416



WWW
« Reply #59 on: October 09, 2015, 02:41:42 PM »

Hinges on the stupidity of the gullible sycophant trusting the deceptive psychopath. The sycophant knows nothing more but to have complete trust in the one who is hand feeding them regardless if it's poison or not.

So, yes, which you know is weak. Like the Christian who insists atheists only reject God to avoid answering for sin. Remove this brick the house crumbles.

Report to moderator   Logged
thebrink
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3173



« Reply #60 on: October 09, 2015, 06:25:17 PM »

So, yes, which you know is weak. Like the Christian who insists atheists only reject God to avoid answering for sin. Remove this brick the house crumbles.




 Wink
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!