Jay vs. Ronnie.. posedown

[Iceman1981]

I'll post more pics later.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I'll post more pics later.

Great shots , keep em coming !

[kiwiol]

What dumbasses are trying to compare Coleman to Heath?
No fucking comparison.

I wouldn't go that far. The 99 Mr O version of Ronnie would beat this year's version of Phil, but not by a huge margin. Flex Wheeler was built similar to Phil, weighed less and was just as narrow and he pushed Ronnie in that Olympia. And Phil is more complete than Flex, although Flex looks slightly better shape-wise. 2003 Ronnie was a lot bigger, but he was about 257 lb in the 99 O, while Phil was just under 250 lb this year - less than a 10 lb difference.

[Shockwave]

I wouldn't go that far. The 99 Mr O version of Ronnie would beat this year's version of Phil, but not by a huge margin. Flex Wheeler was built similar to Phil, weighed less and was just as narrow and he pushed Ronnie in that Olympia. And Phil is more complete than Flex, although Flex looks slightly better shape-wise. 2003 Ronnie was a lot bigger, but he was about 257 lb in the 99 O, while Phil was just under 250 lb this year - less than a 10 lb difference.

Yeah, but Phils structure blows next to Ronnies, not to mention the difference in separation.
Phil may weight nearly the same, but in respect to muscular quality, IMO, there is no comparison.

The look of Phils muscularity compared to Ronnies, is the same of Ronnie's to Dorians... Looks very marshmellowy when compared to Ronnie.

I feel, if youre going to compare the 2 conditioning wise, that a later Ronnie would be more comparable. 2003 for instance.

[kiwiol]

Yeah, but Phils structure blows next to Ronnies, not to mention the difference in separation.
Phil may weight nearly the same, but in respect to muscular quality, IMO, there is no comparison.

The look of Phils muscularity compared to Ronnies, is the same of Ronnie's to Dorians... Looks very marshmellowy when compared to Ronnie.

I feel, if youre going to compare the 2 conditioning wise, that a later Ronnie would be more comparable. 2003 for instance.

Ronnie does have a better structure, true, which is one of the reasons he'd beat Phil. Flex looked ridiculous in that Olympia with all the oil, but that didn't stop him from beating Cormier who had better muscle quality, so it might not be that big a factor. Plus Phil actually looks great in all of his mandatory poses and is more balanced than Flex, IMO, and also more conditioned.

My point is Phil won't get blown away and would hold his own, but would get beaten in the end all things considered.

[Shockwave]

Ronnie does have a better structure, true, which is one of the reasons he'd beat Phil. Flex looked ridiculous in that Olympia with all the oil, but that didn't stop him from beating Cormier who had better muscle quality, so it might not be that big a factor. Plus Phil actually looks great in all of his mandatory poses and is more balanced than Flex, IMO, also more conditioned.

My point is Phil won't get blown away and would hold his own, but would get beaten in the end all things considered.

Yeah you wont see me arguing that, my point is that Phil has a long way to go and a lot of Olympias to win before hes mentioned in the same sentance as Ronnie as far as being the GOAT is concerned.

[kiwiol]

Yeah you wont see me arguing that, my point is that Phil has a long way to go and a lot of Olympias to win before hes mentioned in the same sentance as Ronnie as far as being the GOAT is concerned.

Absolutely, I can agree with that.

[Cutlet767]

Holy shit lol

[Wiggs]

great shots iceman. Thanks

[Iceman1981]

More Prejudging

[Iceman1981]

...............

[Iceman1981]

More Finals

[Iceman1981]

............

[Iceman1981]

....

[Hulkster]

great shots. destroys both yates and heath.

the naysayers are freaking out.

[NarcissisticDeity]

great shots. destroys both yates and heath.

the naysayers are freaking out.

ironic they look nothing like your worked ones huh?  

[Hulkster]

ironic they look nothing like your worked one huh?  

none of those shots are from the side by side prejudging.

sorry.

nice try. but you fail again.

[NarcissisticDeity]

none of those shots are from the side by side prejudging.

sorry.

hahahahahaha dude trash those , save these. post these

[Swlabr]

Here we go again.

[NarcissisticDeity]

none of those shots are from the side by side prejudging.

sorry.

nice try. but you fail again.

Hahahahaha swapped out the original pic you posted huh? 

it doesn't matter if it's prejudging or not the quality isn't gonna change , your pictures suck compared to these and have been proven to be tampered with , you have been failing for years now.

[TrueGrit]

He looks great but not as impressive as the legendary Yates b&w pics.

I'm not trolling.

[Shockwave]

none of those shots are from the side by side prejudging.

sorry.

nice try. but you fail again.

HAHAHAA!!!
Only you, in a thread where everyone is praising Ronnie, is going to come in and post a pic of Yates, and not only post worked pics of Ronnie to try and validate your claims, but try and defend them (worked Ronnie pics) when much clearer high quality pics are 2 posts up, proving you wrong.

You truely are one of a kind Hulkster, one of a kind.

He doesnt fail Hulkster, you do. There is no way youre so blind you cant realize youre the laughing stock of this board, right up there with Derek A and Vince G.

(Well, maybe not quite that bad)

[NarcissisticDeity]

HAHAHAA!!!
Only you, in a thread where everyone is praising Ronnie, is going to come in and post a pic of Yates, and not only post worked pics of Ronnie to try and validate your claims, but try and defend them (worked Ronnie pics) when much clearer high quality pics are 2 posts up, proving you wrong.

You truely are one of a kind Hulkster, one of a kind.

He doesnt fail Hulkster, you do. There is no way youre so blind you cant realize youre the laughing stock of this board, right up there with Derek A and Vince G.

(Well, maybe not quite that bad)

Great post !! he is an idiot for clinging to those ridiculous pics , like I said he should trash all those worked ones and keep and post these , Ronnie doesn't need his pic's tampered with the guy looks outstanding 

[johnny1]

great shots. destroys both yates and heath.

the naysayers are freaking out.

Colemans 1998 MR O Shape Vs a Prime Yates would be Colemans best shot in Defeating a prime yates 50/50 ether-way imo... he would need that Dryness with full muscles bellys @ UNDER 250lbs to compete with Yates for the win not his Outrageous size from 99 onwards, it was Yates ALL ROUND Conditioning that made him the best not the size factor difference in the competition in relation to Direct Visuals and other Dialog in relation to Criteria on whos "Better"

[POTA]

These pics made me want to create some GIFs of Ronnie's back from the '99 Olympia.