Author Topic: Im watching "The Shining" right now (Read 18164 times)

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #75 on:** January 18, 2012, 05:27:00 PM »

Quote from: theEsquire on January 18, 2012, 05:20:47 PM

I watched the movie in it's entirety recently on DVD. This scene makes no sense to me and, unfortunately, there hasn't really been any commentary on it. Apparently, one of the guests who died in the hotel was a furry???

If you ever have some time to kill, this guy hear talks about how heavily Kubrick was in with the Occult/Heirachy. I believe what is going on in this scene is Kubrick telling the "conscious" viewer about the Illuminati and their occult ties. All of Kubricks movies are tied together. This scene here in the Shining and Kubrick last film "Eyes Wide Shut" come together.

[ Invalid YouTube link ]

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #76 on:** January 18, 2012, 05:32:33 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on January 17, 2012, 07:03:08 PM

king "hated" the movie because it was different than his book and surpassed his book

kubrick took king's idea and made it much better

there is no other logical explanation for an obvious horror fan to "hate" that movie

E

King is deeply into the Occult. And he knew that Kubrick took his book and was telling more than one story with the Shining. As he did with all his movies. King saying he hated the Shining movie was King telling the Hierarchy that he doesn't agree with Kubrick telling "their" secrets.

The Ugly · « **Reply #77 on:** January 18, 2012, 07:00:48 PM »

I'm gonna watch this shit again tonight.

dr.chimps · « **Reply #78 on:** January 19, 2012, 04:33:35 AM »

Quote from: theEsquire on January 18, 2012, 05:20:47 PM

I watched the movie in it's entirety recently on DVD. This scene makes no sense to me and, unfortunately, there hasn't really been any commentary on it. Apparently, one of the guests who died in the hotel was a furry???

If you read the book, it mentions that the hotel hosted lots of parties, including costume parties, so I just took it to mean that.

Doug_Steele · « **Reply #79 on:** January 19, 2012, 04:50:53 AM »

Quote from: dr.chimps on January 19, 2012, 04:33:35 AM

If you read the book, it mentions that the hotel hosted lots of parties, including costume parties, so I just took it to mean that.

I am on a Vacation (Kinda) and am trying to watch this film.

BIG ACH · « **Reply #80 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:27:17 AM »

Quote from: JBGRAY on January 14, 2012, 05:27:39 PM

Or awesome blowjobs

Pretty sure I remember this in the book!

wes · « **Reply #81 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:43:47 AM »

Quote from: Doug_Steele on January 19, 2012, 04:50:53 AM

I am on a Vacation (Kinda) and am trying to watch this film.

Are you stating in a large resort type hotel ?

Doug_Steele · « **Reply #82 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:48:06 AM »

Quote from: wes on January 19, 2012, 05:43:47 AM

Are you stating in a large resort type hotel ?

Nope, but i am still on Getbig.

Royalty · « **Reply #83 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:51:34 AM »

Interesting observation:

"It has been pointed out that there's a mirror in every scene in which Jack sees a ghost, causing us to wonder whether the spirits are reflections of a tortured psyche."

Royalty's Opinion: the Ghosts are not reflections of Jack... The ghosts are real. A real ghost had to unlock the door in the kitchen to free Jack Torrence. Leading up to that point; Wendy hit Jack with a bat, causing him to fall down the stairs. She then dragged him to the kitchen and locked him in that huge pantry. Locks dont unlock themselves! Sombody had to unlock him. I believe Delbert Grady unlocked Jack. It sure as hell was not Wendy or Danny!!

wes · « **Reply #84 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:52:29 AM »

Quote from: Doug_Steele on January 19, 2012, 05:48:06 AM

Nope, but i am still on Getbig.

Are you crazy.....it`s not safe here!

Doug_Steele · « **Reply #85 on:** January 19, 2012, 05:55:38 AM »

Quote from: wes on January 19, 2012, 05:52:29 AM

Are you crazy.....it`s not safe here!

YES!!

I cannot leave GB.

The Ugly · « **Reply #86 on:** January 19, 2012, 04:39:15 PM »

Just watched it again. Epic. But what's the deal with the old hag in the bath tub?

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #87 on:** January 19, 2012, 09:14:49 PM »

Quote from: The Ugly on January 19, 2012, 04:39:15 PM

Just watched it again. Epic. But what's the deal with the old hag in the bath tub?

Kubrick was deep in to the Occult. And partied with the hierarchy. However, he was never truly one of them. He didn't have the bloodline. The Hierarchy used him as a tool(fake moon landing etc). Kubrick is telling the viewers that the Occult/Hierarchy fooled him into thinking he would be one of them. And when he found out that he could never be part of the club, the Hierarchy laughed at him. Hence, hot chick turning into the hag.

andreisdaman · « **Reply #88 on:** January 19, 2012, 11:42:09 PM »

Quote from: The Abdominal Snoman on January 19, 2012, 09:14:49 PM

Kubrick was deep in to the Occult. And partied with the hierarchy. However, he was never truly one of them. He didn't have the bloodline. The Hierarchy used him as a tool(fake moon landing etc). Kubrick is telling the viewers that the Occult/Hierarchy fooled him into thinking he would be one of them. And when he found out that he could never be part of the club, the Hierarchy laughed at him. Hence, hot chick turning into the hag.

dude..get a grip....you're nuts!

PJim · « **Reply #89 on:** January 20, 2012, 06:06:03 AM »

Quote from: andreisdaman on January 19, 2012, 11:42:09 PM

dude..get a grip....you're nuts!

Not quite. Kubrick was definitely somebody in the know at one point or another.

wes · « **Reply #90 on:** January 20, 2012, 06:11:30 AM »

Quote from: The Ugly on January 19, 2012, 04:39:15 PM

Just watched it again. Epic. But what's the deal with the old hag in the bath tub?

That shit was creepy!

Tito24 · « **Reply #91 on:** January 20, 2012, 06:13:38 AM »

yes, best movie ever, i change it in the movie thread

Purge_WTF · « **Reply #92 on:** January 20, 2012, 06:30:07 AM »

Alex Jones has an entire section of his message board dedicated to Kubrick's films. Stanley was way ahead of his time.

PJim · « **Reply #93 on:** January 20, 2012, 06:34:53 AM »

Quote from: Purge_WTF on January 20, 2012, 06:30:07 AM

Alex Jones has an entire section of his message board dedicated to Kubrick's films. Stanley was way ahead of his time.

It still boggles the mind that 2001 was made in the mid to late 60's.

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #94 on:** January 20, 2012, 10:06:44 AM »

Quote from: andreisdaman on January 19, 2012, 11:42:09 PM

dude..get a grip....you're nuts!

I didn't come up with the theory bro. Many people have studied Kubrick and come to the conclusion that he knew way too much about things most people couldn't even fathom. 2001 made in the 1960's really shouldn't have existed back then.

_bruce_ · « **Reply #95 on:** January 20, 2012, 11:12:38 AM »

Kubrick was ahead of his time and had the talent and means to carve his wisdom into entertainment history.

dr.chimps · « **Reply #96 on:** January 20, 2012, 11:17:15 AM »

Quote from: The Abdominal Snoman on January 20, 2012, 10:06:44 AM

I didn't come up with the theory bro. Many people have studied Kubrick and come to the conclusion that he knew way too much about things most people couldn't even fathom. 2001 made in the 1960's really shouldn't have existed back then.

Not true. But he was an exceptional director who realized his vision(s) very convincingly.

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #97 on:** January 20, 2012, 11:33:24 AM »

Good Kubrick article here.

http://rvamag.com/articles/full/4198/no-kubrick-movie-just-movie-10-years-after-eyes-wide-shut

SilverSpoon · « **Reply #98 on:** January 20, 2012, 01:32:33 PM »

It is well known that Kubrick was warning us all with his portrayal of the computer in 2001: A Space Odyssey, by naming the computer "HAL".
Each letter is exactly one letter away from IBM.