Author Topic: vegetarian vs normal diet comparison  (Read 6765 times)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: vegetarian vs normal diet comparison
« Reply #25 on: January 22, 2012, 01:58:22 PM »
On another note, its quite funny that these people think their "healthy" eating their chicken, broccoli, and rice.  Chicken is fucking loaded with hormones and all this other shit they put it in it.

  Most of these molecules get hydrolized by cooking and are rendered inactive.

Quote
 Cooking vegetables, or anything for that matter- destroys most of the bioavailable nutrients.

  This is true. But cooking certain vegetables is beneficial. For instance, spinach is loaded with oxalic acid, a very powerful anti-nutrient. Cooking it destroys 100% of the oxalic acid but only 50% of the other nutrients in spinach, such as B vitamins and antioxidants. It is better to get 50% of the nutrients without oxalic acid rather than 100% of the nutrients with oxalic acid. As a general rule, you should cook your green leafy vegetables - except for lettuce - and eat your cruciferous vegetalbes raw. Cooking broccoli is a crime.

Quote
 I'm just gonna stop there because I could easily go on forever- you wanna be real "healthy": Eat raw foods, eat all organic, use the ANDI scale, all wild caught fish, get some fucking sun, don't use sun screen, don't use the microwave...... etc...... stopping there lol

  Microwaves are not determinetal in any way, unless you stick your head inside the oven while it is on. All the internet claims that micowaves are dangerous come from ignorant people without a scientic background. As for sunscreens, you are right. The derivatives of benzoic acid that are used in these products might actually cause skin cancer rather than prevent it. And you shouldn't get a lot of sun at all. Nothing is as bad for you as getting too much Sun exposure except for maybe eating too much salt. 20 minutes of early morning Sun is all you need for vitamin D synthesis and vitamin A conversion. Anything more and you verge into cancer-risk territory.

  Now you want to be really healthy? Then eat no more than about 500 calories a day. That is all that matters when it comes to extreme health and longevity increase. A guy who eats only 500 calories a day of butter or sugar will have lower markers of inflammation, a better blood lipoprotein profile and insulin resistence than a guy who eats 3,000 calories a day of skinless chicken breats, brown rice and broccoli.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

FAST LANE

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 912
  • Life's too short to be small
Re: vegetarian vs normal diet comparison
« Reply #26 on: January 22, 2012, 02:08:27 PM »
Now you want to be really healthy? Then eat no more than about 500 calories a day. That is all that matters when it comes to extreme health and longevity increase. A guy who eats only 500 calories a day of butter or sugar will have lower markers of inflammation, a better blood lipoprotein profile and insulin resistence than a guy who eats 3,000 calories a day of skinless chicken breats, brown rice and broccoli.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Agree 100%