Author Topic: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman (Read 34229 times)

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #100 on:** February 11, 2012, 05:46:11 AM »

Can someone photoshop Ronnie as a white guy for rocket switch ....
...

Bad Boy Dazza · « **Reply #101 on:** February 11, 2012, 05:56:00 AM »

Quote from: Tito24 on February 10, 2012, 02:48:59 AM

oh really?? who gives a ratass retard

It was a joke. Clearly an inferior race wrote it.

Bad Boy Dazza · « **Reply #102 on:** February 11, 2012, 05:57:06 AM »

GOLD

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2012, 07:48:35 PM

amazing what a difference a more fair comparison makes

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #103 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:00:48 AM »

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #104 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:07:04 AM »

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #105 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:10:44 AM »

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #106 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:14:05 AM »

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #107 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:15:24 AM »

Quote from: ARNIE1947 on February 11, 2012, 06:14:05 AM

..

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #108 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:17:10 AM »

Quote from: ARNIE1947 on February 11, 2012, 06:15:24 AM

Shockwave · « **Reply #109 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:19:36 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2012, 07:48:35 PM

amazing what a difference a more fair comparison makes

Lawl, yeah, a more fair comparison where Ronnie's waist is ~~as wide~~ wider than Dorians, epic fail broseph.
Epic fail.

This is pretty bad bro, this is almost Hulkster status... $:-\$

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #110 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:25:44 AM »

MB · « **Reply #111 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:28:02 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2012, 07:48:35 PM

amazing what a difference a more fair comparison makes

It's apples and oranges, but these pics here pretty much some up the differences. I think Dorian's balance and conditioning beat Coleman. Little things like the gap in Ronnie's abs and the out of balance calves make the difference.

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #112 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:30:12 AM »

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #113 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:47:05 AM »

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #114 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:52:38 AM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #115 on:** February 11, 2012, 07:05:34 AM »

this comparison is interesting because both dorian and ronnie here probably weigh close to the same (245ish pounds)

ronnie in his trimmed up AC appearance

and

dorian in his 1992 olympia win

again, dorian's back is harder but his arms are undersized, ruining the balance.

ronnie's back is much thicker with better symmetry and a much more pronounced V taper, but not as hard.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #116 on:** February 11, 2012, 07:51:10 AM »

Dorian was too thick for the lighter (98 or 01) version of Ronnie and too conditioned for the blown up version of Coleman. Dorian combined mass AND conditioning better than anyone.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #117 on:** February 11, 2012, 08:41:20 AM »

Yates is still better because he retired undefeated. Spazman got pwned by a refrigerator while disguised as Moses. How embarrassing it must've been for the likes of Hulkster. LOL

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #118 on:** February 11, 2012, 08:42:23 AM »

Quote from: ARNIE1947 on February 11, 2012, 06:47:05 AM

The Shadow making Coleman look waterlogged as usual.

purenaturalstrength · « **Reply #119 on:** February 11, 2012, 08:44:35 AM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 11, 2012, 08:41:20 AM

Yates is still better because he retired undefeated. Spazman got pwned by a refrigerator while disguised as Moses. How embarrassing it must've been for the likes of Hulkster. LOL

rocketswitch625 you better calm down because 90% of getbig is prepared to die for ronnie the coleman's honor

Hulkster · « **Reply #120 on:** February 11, 2012, 08:59:34 AM »

Quote

Dorian combined mass AND conditioning better than anyone.

no, because his muscle shape and taper were not nearly as good as ronnie, who did it much better..

he had mass, he had conditioning, but was built like a 'portapotty' as someone so beautifully said LOL

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #121 on:** February 11, 2012, 11:13:33 AM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 11, 2012, 08:41:20 AM

Yates is still better because he retired undefeated. Spazman got pwned by a refrigerator while disguised as Moses. How embarrassing it must've been for the likes of Hulkster. LOL

Retired Undefeated? NO.
Retired Undefeated during his 6 years as Mr. Olympia? YES.

I have a question for you. Do you hate Ronnie? All your posts are either praising Dorian or bashing Ronnie with every post you make. I haven't seen you contribute anything else to these forums.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #122 on:** February 11, 2012, 06:40:47 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on February 11, 2012, 11:13:33 AM

Retired Undefeated? NO.
Retired Undefeated during his 6 years as Mr. Olympia? YES.

I have a question for you. Do you hate Ronnie? All your posts are either praising Dorian or bashing Ronnie with every post you make. I haven't seen you contribute anything else to these forums.

I don't hate Ronnie Coleman, I just have a nothingness about his nut-hugging fans.

Metabolic · « **Reply #123 on:** February 11, 2012, 07:02:43 PM »

I think it is at least curious that people shout day in and day out about Dorians conditioning when Coleman had stupid and unseen muscle separation, striation, vascularity...

And no, I wont get into the genetics and striation debate agan, Im just trying to raise an interrogant for everyone to ponder.

johnny1 · « **Reply #124 on:** February 11, 2012, 07:16:57 PM »

Ronnie will always have the "Whao" factor over Yates he had a Better V Taper and crazy Muscle bellys with Great separation in his best years, no one that is actually being OBJECTIVE is Disputing this (listening Hulkster objective the key word), what the real issue is as in a RESULT between the 2 would be IMO is who had the LEAST amount of "weakness" with all that goes along with it....as in with the Judging Criteria on the ACTUAL DAY of the contest... Size IMO between the 2 would NOT BE the deciding factor... the least amount of weakness with the most complete balance, conditioning, presentation of the physique, etc etc would be, this is where the Debate should be heading, however alot here are not interested in that particular Debate just who looks "Better" in pics etc.