Author Topic: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential? Update  (Read 13455 times)

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2012, 03:30:32 AM »
good physique, but doesn't look 50lbs. more than Arnold on the same frame

Bingo. The illusion of size isn't there.

OptimusPrime1980

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2292
  • FODA SE! ;)
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #26 on: April 10, 2012, 08:06:16 AM »

No.
Too tall. Can never fill out.

You can see how for example his arms are shit, nowhere near pro caliber... they are down hill -like.


Oh, he can be another down hill for sure but being competitive pro? Nope.
arms are shit?? i do not see a fdb pose or bdb pose.....so no way of telling really
his tri's are not that bad, as are his forearms.... it is because he has long limbs, toney freeman has the same thing...
all of us tallies have that problem.

but this dude has an AWSOME frame!!!! very nice physique! this is what bodybuilding is about!
tiny waist, sweeped quads, even great calves.... wide back! and boulder shoulders!
looks far better then that carwreck Branch!

but carwrecks are what win contests these days... so will he be a good pro.... ? as sad as it makes me to say it, but NOPE.....

but a great physique!!!
Be Happy,
Optimus

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #27 on: April 10, 2012, 02:09:55 PM »
Bit Berry de Mey indeed..... 8)

OptimusPrime1980

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2292
  • FODA SE! ;)
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2012, 02:52:47 PM »
Bingo. The illusion of size isn't there.
this is silly...
you are seeing a pic of a dude standing by himself...
he is a real 6'2 which arnold never was lol! ;D ;D ;D
if you were to put arnold in his prime next to this dude , arnold would get killed... ( and i am an arnold fan...)
everything is just bigger, denser, and more conditioned... remember muscle = heavier then fat mass.... 
1cm3 of blubber will be of a greater volume then the same quantity of muscle...
his legs are more developed, and there is a LOT of weight in legs.
his back as well, far more developed..... also a lot of weight goes there....
you guys are looking at arms, and chest... small bodyparts.....


but comparing bb from different era is very stupid.... Arnold was king in his era.... this dude is a nobody in his.....


Be Happy,
Optimus

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #29 on: April 10, 2012, 03:01:02 PM »
this is silly...
you are seeing a pic of a dude standing by himself...
he is a real 6'2 which arnold never was lol! ;D ;D ;D
if you were to put arnold in his prime next to this dude , arnold would get killed... ( and i am an arnold fan...)
everything is just bigger, denser, and more conditioned... remember muscle = heavier then fat mass.... 
1cm3 of blubber will be of a greater volume then the same quantity of muscle...
his legs are more developed, and there is a LOT of weight in legs.
his back as well, far more developed..... also a lot of weight goes there....
you guys are looking at arms, and chest... small bodyparts.....


but comparing bb from different era is very stupid.... Arnold was king in his era.... this dude is a nobody in his.....





The guy has a really good structure and good shape everywhere but triceps, delts, chest (less so), really lack fullness and pop.

He brings them up or has a synthol orgy he would be very complete. Small waist, quad sweep, detailed back, real good lines, i like this guys look a lot better than most pro's.

But yeah it's modern bodybuilding so no.
Trans Milkshake.

MassiveM

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 92
  • Founder of Thunderdome Drama!
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #30 on: April 10, 2012, 04:10:56 PM »
Looks like shit of drugs.
Team Sarcasm

RustyTrenbolona

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1195
  • ...but it's just an empty sandwich bag...
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #31 on: April 10, 2012, 04:14:25 PM »

Gregzs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17372
  • Getbig!

OptimusPrime1980

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2292
  • FODA SE! ;)
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #33 on: April 10, 2012, 05:11:17 PM »

The guy has a really good structure and good shape everywhere but triceps, delts, chest (less so), really lack fullness and pop.

He brings them up or has a synthol orgy he would be very complete. Small waist, quad sweep, detailed back, real good lines, i like this guys look a lot better than most pro's.

But yeah it's modern bodybuilding so no.
yeah...
but nothing he can ever do about that....
i also am tall and very wide... wide clavicles have one disadvantage... you have way more space to fill out.... and i seem to grow more in width then in depth in these areas if you know what i mean... the chest/front shoulder area.....
triceps also... long limbs usually mean high triceps .... nothing he can do but just keep on going... but toney is doing fine with his arms....

and yes, in modern day bodybuilding he will be stuck as TOP ELITE amateur.... because we know what wins pro shows....
having said that i completely agree with you , that he looks way, waaaay better than 90% of current pro's!a dude like this should get supplement company as a sponsor and just do guestposing and photoshoots...and tell lies how he got there using their products, lol!! he is very marketable and will make more money that way then getting shafted at 2nd tier pro shows....


Be Happy,
Optimus

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #34 on: April 10, 2012, 09:16:17 PM »
Paul Polozeck - winner of the Loaded Cup in Denmark yesterday




Looks 250 at most, but yes pro potential. Great physique!

OptimusPrime1980

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2292
  • FODA SE! ;)
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #35 on: April 11, 2012, 04:48:14 AM »
Looks 250 at most, but yes pro potential. Great physique!
steve, you have no clue how muscle looks on tall people.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
but i agree with you and whatever he weighs is not even important, dude has an awesome built!
Be Happy,
Optimus

ChevChelios

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 993
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #36 on: April 11, 2012, 04:52:25 AM »
steve, you have no clue how muscle looks on tall people.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
but i agree with you and whatever he weighs is not even important, dude has an awesome built!


neah,he is just furious when he talks about guys taller than 5'2  :D
GETBIG!

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #37 on: April 11, 2012, 04:53:27 AM »
His 1 day out interview with posing:

http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/b5ee68d7e80bae8f4090/loaded-cup-2012-paul-poloczek-one-day-out


Very aesthetic build.

This is bodybuilding, who the fuck would want to look like Branch or Phil over this?
Trans Milkshake.

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26650
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #38 on: April 11, 2012, 04:57:35 AM »

Very aesthetic build.

This is bodybuilding, who the fuck would want to look like Branch or Phil over this?

wide-hipped pear bodies with jumbo joints would i suppose

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #39 on: April 11, 2012, 06:30:53 AM »
Bingo. The illusion of size isn't there.

I agree with both of you guys.  His muscles lack the round fullness that makes them pop...no homo.   Good shape though.
A

bradistani

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 70692
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #40 on: April 11, 2012, 06:33:29 AM »
Needs more gut to win anything substantial.

 ;D

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #41 on: April 11, 2012, 08:10:54 AM »
he looks great as is, but would not place well in today's standards. He needs a lot more size.
?

Ronnie Rep

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10117
  • Getbig!
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #42 on: April 11, 2012, 01:41:56 PM »
Needs site injections in Biceps!

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #43 on: April 11, 2012, 01:43:12 PM »


there is no way this guy is 280 pounds on stage.
b

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #44 on: April 11, 2012, 01:44:00 PM »
Big DOWN hill 2

OptimusPrime1980

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2292
  • FODA SE! ;)
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #45 on: April 11, 2012, 03:51:15 PM »

there is no way this guy is 280 pounds on stage.
well, people claim hugo gerard 300 pounds on stage at 6'2......
no way to tell if these dudes their claimed heights are real....
but if this dude is a legit 6'2..... he would be heavy.... but indeed 280 , dunno....
hell even toney freeman looks best when he is 270....
but in the end the dude has a great physique! however he looks to good to ever be a decent ifbb pro...  ;D ;D
Be Happy,
Optimus

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #46 on: April 11, 2012, 03:55:31 PM »
Big DOWN hill 2


Come on bro, this guy is several orders of magnitude better than Big Down's.

No comparison.
Trans Milkshake.

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28343
  • stuff for dumplings
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #47 on: April 11, 2012, 03:56:45 PM »
What is his going rate?

Gregzs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17372
  • Getbig!
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #48 on: April 13, 2012, 11:48:51 AM »
He is competing again at FIBO:

Translated from Czech:

Olimp Challenge 2012

 Date: 12/04/2012

Igor scoop ... 13th April 2012 - FIBO POWER is particularly extensive exhibition and presentation of companies whose business is fitness and bodybuilding in any form - from the production of nutritional supplements and selling small gear finishing. Next week in Essen will open its exhibition and 30 companies whose ads for dietary supplements meet journal page - they will present nearly 160 stars and stars of our sport. I personally wonder who long for the "cost" of competitors Olimp Challenge 2012, or who the actors stand on what appears:
Paul Poloczek ... Olimp Germany
Marco Schmidt ... without a sponsor who will be at FIBO
Alexey Shabunya ... without a sponsor who will be at FIBO
Tomas Kaspar ... ALL STARS
Peter Molnar ... without a sponsor who will be at FIBO
Oliver Reinhardt ... without a sponsor who will be at FIBO
Steve Havlik ... Body Maxx Nutrition
Peter Smith ... without a sponsor who will be at FIBO


http://www.eastlabs.biz/article/2387/SID=e8a10722a2a4b4ab606c6848a8cb610a


local hero

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8714
  • mma finance warrior of peace
Re: 6'2 280lbs - do you think that s pro potential?
« Reply #49 on: April 13, 2012, 12:29:14 PM »
if u watch the vid on andro he looks ok,, but no where near top pro potential, hasnt got the pop as has been said