Who is taking him to court? The whore? Or the people against pimping?
From what I can understand from the translation his former business partner (and friend) is suing him because of the incident. It looks like FIBO charges a sum for the incident and his former partner wants Hill to pay for it. Hill was sent a message that he wasn't getting paid for his time at the booth as well.
Internet translation:
Soon the FIBO is just around the corner, and one or the other will be wondering what has become of IFBB Pro Daniel Hill.
The Daniel Hill conflict to the alleged punch against a woman at FIBO culminated in the termination of the sponsoring contract by Multipower. Afterwards , Daniel Hill was preparing before a professional competition and announced thereafter, however, MMA Fighter wanting to be.
Now brings him to the incident in 2012 again.
For Monday, 11 March 2013 at 10:30 clock (reference: 2-27 O 363/12), the Frankfurt District Court has set a date for hearing, and it also arranged the personal appearance of the defendant Daniel Hill.
What is at stake in the dispute?
His former friend and business partner Murat S. argues Daniel Hill to work at the state Energy Care (the bracelets that will have a particular effect) to have been commissioned. Payment must be Daniel but still owed.
From the brief to the court, which Body-Xtreme was present, it says it as follows:
"On the last day there was after the work on the stand of the defendant to an incident in which the defendant came repeatedly with his partner in dispute. The situation escalated, however, to the extent that the defendant is his partner on the show from further audience a punch in the Face replied.
Evidence: Testimony of Enrico S. ..., bb
The defendant asked the plaintiff, therefore, to keep the incident to herself. Since the defendant as one of the youngest bodybuilding professionals in the public and the action was taking place in the middle of the biggest bodybuilding and fitness show in the world, it only took a few days for the relevant media the incident published worldwide. An eyewitness was also a quote from the plaintiff [Murat S., NB Body-Xtreme ] published. "
...
Murat S. also argues that Daniel Hill has it may not pay out of pure anger because he had "not kept tight" has. As it involves alleged violence was against a woman, could not agree with Murat S. conscience to protect Daniel Hill.
Following the FIBO sent Murat S. his bill, in lieu of payment Daniel Hill's "so-called friend Murat" sent, however, a video message from Las Vegas and told that he will get no money.
Murat S. initiated in the meantime already the legal dunning procedure and eventually received an enforcement notice against Daniel Hill with whom he then instructed the local bailiff for enforcement.
Daniel Hill switched only a lawyer, claiming the pleadings the court could never reach him because he was in the United States. Since this is probably irrelevant as the operator of a shop, he later corrected the presentation and explained that he just prior notification of the enforcement order but not in the U.S. was, but in Germany in order to fit them with his a new mailbox at the store. The postman had then thrown the notification of the delivery of the enforcement order in the wrong mailbox.
It will be interesting, as the court will decide, and keep you on the further course of the proceedings to date.
