This is truly PATHETIC

[DKlent]

They would receive "good" healthcare through medicaid. Now shut the fuck up.

Children are covered.

Which totally sucks as medical coverage (used medicaid as a child).

[DanielPaul]

Ok assbags no child will be without care in our country as long as there lazy ass parents care enough about them to apply for medicade.  If they truely are broke and cant afford it they qualify but if they can afford it and they choose not to get it well its on them.  What the problem with all this is if we start giving shit out for free where does it end.  My wife and I rake in about 140,000 per year together and pay about 38% of our income to taxes the last fucking thin I want to see is another failed government program that cant pay for itself let the politicians figure out a legit way to pay for this and im all for it but until then im not for it so fuck you.

[DanielPaul]

ok and the gov runs medicade and you want to put them in charge of the whole thing..... that makes perfect fucking sense

[DKlent]

ok and the gov runs medicade and you want to put them in charge of the whole thing..... that makes perfect fucking sense

The problem with medicade isn't that the govt. runs it, it is how it is set up and funded. The govt. runs police departments, fire-fighters and the military and these things tend to be pretty efficient. USPS is another example. Cheap, effective and reliable.

[kh300]

The problem with medicade isn't that the govt. runs it, it is how it is set up and funded. The govt. runs police departments, fire-fighters and the military and these things tend to be pretty efficient. USPS is another example. Cheap, effective and reliable.

Not even close. I worked for a city police department. Things worked pretty well. Went to a federal department and its a fucking mess and only getting worse. Most military guys will say its pretty bad there too.

[DKlent]

Not even close. I worked for a city police department. Things worked pretty well. Went to a federal department and its a fucking mess and only getting worse. Most military guys will say its pretty bad there too.

What federal level and how was it a mess?

[Benny B]

what truly pathetic is you post every your fucking politics shit on this board

 

I can not understand your version of english. Grammar is not your friend. 

[Benny B]

Are you saying Obama has never flip flopped or lied

Why are you responding to me, since I am getbig's sole racist in your eyes, Conehead? 

I KNOW IT DOES NOT MATTER TO YOU, BUT NO ONE HAS FLIP-FLOPPED OR LIED TO THE DEGREE AS ROMNEY HAS ON ISSUES FUNDAMENTAL TO HIS POLITICAL PARTY'S BASE.

If Willard wants to run on who has publicly reversed opinion on core party issues, he would lose by a larger margin than McCain. He knows better and will not make that mistake, trust me. Romney may be a complete PHONY, but he is not a stupid man.

Since he IS obviously your man "Chaos", what exactly are Romney's major accomplishments as governor of MA?

[Roger Bacon]

Which totally sucks as medical coverage (used medicaid as a child).

What a surprise! 

[DKlent]

People bitching about off topic political posts in this forum is sort of hilarious in its irony.

[whork]

youve just summed up the gop in the best way anyone ever could.

when looking at their rallies, its obvious theyre mostly between 60 and.....dead.

means they gonna do fuck all anymore in life pretty much, but theyre tight on the money.even though they will die soon and the future can only be the young(duh).when you die, everyone is equal and money means nothing anymore.
 
money is the reason why healthcare thing is opposed from them, right?"cost to much"blabla.maybe a couple dollars a year per head.they have attitudes of dark ages but want to profit from modern things.

every money earned is taken from someone else directly or indirectly anyway.

obama is a shit president but this obamacare is a good thing he did.

+1

[whork]

what makes it the responsability of the fed to make sure everyone has healthcare , thats not what they are elected to do

So what? You cant do something good unless you are ELECTED to do it? Idiot

[DKlent]

What a surprise! 

My parents were poor you twat...

[howardroark]

A lack of a solution is seriously a better option than the "solution" offered to us by radical leftists in the Democrat Party.

[DKlent]

A lack of a solution is seriously a better option than the "solution" offered to us by radical leftists in the Democrat Party.

Dude...Obama is just left of center. You don't know what "radical leftists" are do you? You've probably never met one. If you want to compare Obama and such to some of the far right individuals in the party and perhaps redefine what "center" is then Obama is "radical left", but sticking with how we have defined "right, left and center" over the past century...Obama is a tad left of center.

[chaos]

Why are you responding to me, since I am getbig's sole racist in your eyes, Conehead? 

I KNOW IT DOES NOT MATTER TO YOU, BUT NO ONE HAS FLIP-FLOPPED OR LIED TO THE DEGREE AS ROMNEY HAS ON ISSUES FUNDAMENTAL TO HIS POLITICAL PARTY'S BASE.

If Willard wants to run on who has publicly reversed opinion on core party issues, he would lose by a larger margin than McCain. He knows better and will not make that mistake, trust me. Romney may be a complete PHONY, but he is not a stupid man.

Since he IS obviously your man "Chaos", what exactly are Romney's major accomplishments as governor of MA?

Just pointing out your hypocrisy, Every single politician ever has lied and flip flopped, it's what they do.

[andreisdaman]

Who gives a shit?  Let the uninsured mongrels weed themselves out. 

a lotta white mongrels out there

[andreisdaman]

What federal level and how was it a mess?

you really took him seriously huh?

[andreisdaman]

Dude...Obama is just left of center. You don't know what "radical leftists" are do you? You've probably never met one. If you want to compare Obama and such to some of the far right individuals in the party and perhaps redefine what "center" is then Obama is "radical left", but sticking with how we have defined "right, left and center" over the past century...Obama is a tad left of center.

Good post

[tonymctones]

A lack of a solution is seriously a better option than the "solution" offered to us by radical leftists in the Democrat Party.

yup...

the answer of the left is to act for the sake of acting.

they dont care what the consequences are evidenced by the "we have to pass the bill to see whats in it" mentality and those that back up that idiocy(gimmicks and regulars alike in this thread)

[howardroark]

Dude...Obama is just left of center. You don't know what "radical leftists" are do you? You've probably never met one. If you want to compare Obama and such to some of the far right individuals in the party and perhaps redefine what "center" is then Obama is "radical left", but sticking with how we have defined "right, left and center" over the past century...Obama is a tad left of center.

Bill Clinton was left-of-center. He reduced spending as a percent of GDP and even cut taxes near the end of his term.

Obama is a radical. Obama has links to the Democratic Socialists of America. Furthermore, he was an activist with ACORN - and let me assure you that moderates and centrists don't get involved with community organizing and political activism.

[The Showstoppa]

Bill Clinton was left-of-center. He reduced spending as a percent of GDP and even cut taxes near the end of his term.

Obama is a radical. Obama has links to the Democratic Socialists of America. Furthermore, he was an activist with ACORN - and let me assure you that moderates and centrists don't get involved with community organizing and political activism.

x2

[DKlent]

Bill Clinton was left-of-center. He reduced spending as a percent of GDP and even cut taxes near the end of his term.

Obama is a radical. Obama has links to the Democratic Socialists of America. Furthermore, he was an activist with ACORN - and let me assure you that moderates and centrists don't get involved with community organizing and political activism.

If you are going to make outlandish claims you'll have to provide legitimate sources. Reliable sources. Not "Chicagodsa.org" or articles written people but documented reports by reputable news organizations.


1. Obama is "radical"? How?

2. Obama has "links" to the DSA? So what?

3. Obama was an 'activist with acorn"?
I need:
1. Evidence that he was an "Activist" with ACORN
2. What "activist" means in this sense. What did he do that make shim radical with ACORN? Specifically.



Thanks.

[Soul Crusher]

If you are going to make outlandish claims you'll have to provide legitimate sources. Reliable sources. Not "Chicagodsa.org" or articles written people but documented reports by reputable news organizations.


1. Obama is "radical"? How?

2. Obama has "links" to the DSA? So what?

3. Obama was an 'activist with acorn"?
I need:
1. Evidence that he was an "Activist" with ACORN
2. What "activist" means in this sense. What did he do that make shim radical with ACORN? Specifically.



Thanks.

Typical         obama was a member of the socialist new party remember? 

[DKlent]

Typical         obama was a member of the socialist new party remember? 

1. As far as I know all they did was endorse him. Unless you've got a reliable source (non-blog, non-conservative website but reputable reliable news-source other than Fox)

2.  Even assuming he was a 'member', what does this matter and how does it make him "radical leftist"? Be specific.


Thanks.