Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
December 18, 2014, 02:40:44 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WTC 7, controlled demolition?  (Read 4519 times)
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20872


Decepticons! Scramble!


« Reply #25 on: August 28, 2012, 08:33:21 AM »

offence cannot be given, only taken.

it's funny
I lol'd
Report to moderator   Logged
bighead
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1095


Getbig!


« Reply #26 on: August 28, 2012, 09:32:48 PM »

I lol'd
  Tell me shock, your an intelligent guy here at G.B, and or anywhere else im certain. What is your take on the collapse of wtc 1,2 and 7?
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20872


Decepticons! Scramble!


« Reply #27 on: August 29, 2012, 08:34:07 AM »

  Tell me shock, your an intelligent guy here at G.B, and or anywhere else im certain. What is your take on the collapse of wtc 1,2 and 7?
Honestly, I don't know enough to take a side. Im not educated enough on controlled building demolitions to speculate on that, and I'm not nearly informed enough on the circumstances surrounding it to actually speak on the issue.
Report to moderator   Logged
El Diablo Blanco
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 18197


Nom Nom Nom Nom


« Reply #28 on: August 29, 2012, 08:49:59 AM »

Honestly, I don't know enough to take a side. Im not educated enough on controlled building demolitions to speculate on that, and I'm not nearly informed enough on the circumstances surrounding it to actually speak on the issue.

I just find the whole way the buildings collapsed so perfectly to be a bit far fetched.  Then how the authorities quickly cleaned up the mess and hid all evidence away.

People's counterpoints to this is that it was a job too big to coverup in the government. But that makes sense in how the gov outsourced this to some other outside group.
Report to moderator   Logged
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1229


« Reply #29 on: September 28, 2012, 11:17:15 AM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Trj_5J02k" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Trj_5J02k</a>

So, who claims to be so fucking ignorant piece of shit, that he doesn't see that this video is fake? There can't be such level of stupidity in this world, it is simply too much. Footage found from old camera my ass, that footage has been around years without any fake explosions.
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20679


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2012, 02:07:22 PM »

I just find the whole way the buildings collapsed so perfectly to be a bit far fetched.  Then how the authorities quickly cleaned up the mess and hid all evidence away.

People's counterpoints to this is that it was a job too big to coverup in the government. But that makes sense in how the gov outsourced this to some other outside group.


Were you expecting the buildings to tip over?
Report to moderator   Logged
bighead
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1095


Getbig!


« Reply #31 on: September 28, 2012, 08:04:53 PM »

So, who claims to be so fucking ignorant piece of shit, that he doesn't see that this video is fake? There can't be such level of stupidity in this world, it is simply too much. Footage found from old camera my ass, that footage has been around years without any fake explosions.
Looking at your past posts it would seem you deem everyone a ''fucking ignorant piece of shit'' or ''dumb'' maybe you need to reevaluate if you want someone to respond to you Einstein.
Report to moderator   Logged
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1229


« Reply #32 on: September 28, 2012, 09:36:15 PM »

Looking at your past posts it would seem you deem everyone a ''fucking ignorant piece of shit'' or ''dumb'' maybe you need to reevaluate if you want someone to respond to you Einstein.

Why do I get the feeling that you identify with that description 100% ? Dear child, you have to understand that you are believer of the most ridiculous conspiracy scam ever, and that point only proves that you are few cards shy from the card  deck, if you know what I mean. Please explain how those explosions appear in the clip, which hasn't have them in previous years? Is it same kind of miracle than face of Jesus appearing on the pool of dog shit, or have some one edit that clip afterwards? If you study the so called evidence which so called truth.org present to you, you find out that they are all fake. Truth.org = fake evidence? How the hell that happen?? That is possible only with help from the great bunch of fucking ignorant pieces of shit, called americans. And before you flip and start beating your keyboard, understand this: You should not blame me, I am not the person who lie to you. Blame truth.org who make you look like an ignorant piece of shit.  Grin
Report to moderator   Logged
bighead
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1095


Getbig!


« Reply #33 on: September 29, 2012, 05:47:28 AM »

Why do I get the feeling that you identify with that description 100% ? Dear child, you have to understand that you are believer of the most ridiculous conspiracy scam ever, and that point only proves that you are few cards shy from the card  deck, if you know what I mean. Please explain how those explosions appear in the clip, which hasn't have them in previous years? Is it same kind of miracle than face of Jesus appearing on the pool of dog shit, or have some one edit that clip afterwards? If you study the so called evidence which so called truth.org present to you, you find out that they are all fake. Truth.org = fake evidence? How the hell that happen?? That is possible only with help from the great bunch of fucking ignorant pieces of shit, called americans. And before you flip and start beating your keyboard, understand this: You should not blame me, I am not the person who lie to you. Blame truth.org who make you look like an ignorant piece of shit.  Grin
Why do I get the feeling your 12 yo? The focus of the video was the news reporter's seemingly nostradamus like prediction of wtc7 going down before it actually did, and then the moment where she turns around to see it's still there. The truth movement involves the recounts of people who were actually there that day ie; firefighters who lost there men, police officers, who lost their men and many people who lost family members. Try not to look at your gov't as a paternal figure and the smoke will clear, of course nobody wants to hear their parent is a homicidal maniac. Wink
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20679


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #34 on: September 29, 2012, 09:03:49 AM »

Why do I get the feeling your 12 yo? The focus of the video was the news reporter's seemingly nostradamus like prediction of wtc7 going down before it actually did, and then the moment where she turns around to see it's still there. The truth movement involves the recounts of people who were actually there that day ie; firefighters who lost there men, police officers, who lost their men and many people who lost family members. Try not to look at your gov't as a paternal figure and the smoke will clear, of course nobody wants to hear their parent is a homicidal maniac. Wink

So the reporter was in on it too?  Why would a reporter need to report the WTC going down before it did?  If there was an inside job why would they need a reporter to report the WTC going down when it was going to go down anyway and every reporter would have been reporting it?

Seems very irrelevant.
Report to moderator   Logged
bighead
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1095


Getbig!


« Reply #35 on: September 29, 2012, 10:42:19 AM »

No, she was doing her job and taking orders from her superiors, much like the people who run our countries, The 4th branch of gov't has been an invaluable tool concerning our knowledge of whats ''going on.''-
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20679


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #36 on: September 29, 2012, 11:10:24 AM »

No, she was doing her job and taking orders from her superiors, much like the people who run our countries, The 4th branch of gov't has been an invaluable tool concerning our knowledge of whats ''going on.''-

Why would a reporter need to report the WTC going down before it did? 
If there was an inside job why would they need a reporter to report the WTC going down when it was going to go down anyway and every reporter would have been reporting it?

and...

Why would her superiors tell her to do that?  What would be the ultimate purpose?
Report to moderator   Logged
bighead
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1095


Getbig!


« Reply #37 on: September 29, 2012, 03:34:29 PM »

Call it preemptive reporting, or way too early press release. Did you watch the video?
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20679


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #38 on: September 29, 2012, 05:48:12 PM »

Call it preemptive reporting, or way too early press release. Did you watch the video?

You still have answered the questions.  Are you avoiding them?

I will reword them.

What purpose does it serve in the grand scheme of an inside job, to report preemptively buildings collapsing, when one of your schemes of the inside job is to in fact bring the them down?

And...

Why would you go throu the trouble of forcing a network exec to order a reporter to say the buildings went down before they actually did go down when all along you were intending for them to go down thus risking exposure by increasing the people involved in the inside job when it doesnt serve any real purpose?
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20679


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #39 on: September 29, 2012, 05:52:25 PM »

I think it's safe to say, the reporter vid is completely irrelevant to the truther argument/case. 
Report to moderator   Logged
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1229


« Reply #40 on: September 30, 2012, 12:33:52 AM »

Why do I get the feeling your 12 yo? The focus of the video was the news reporter's seemingly nostradamus like prediction of wtc7 going down before it actually did, and then the moment where she turns around to see it's still there. The truth movement involves the recounts of people who were actually there that day ie; firefighters who lost there men, police officers, who lost their men and many people who lost family members. Try not to look at your gov't as a paternal figure and the smoke will clear, of course nobody wants to hear their parent is a homicidal maniac. Wink

Dear moron, have you ever heard about video editing? If they want they can put anything to the background of the reporter to fool you, and then they even tell you in the video what you should see in it. Find the original clip, it is different.
Report to moderator   Logged
Hugo Chavez
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 31873


« Reply #41 on: September 30, 2012, 01:17:19 AM »

Dear moron, have you ever heard about video editing? If they want they can put anything to the background of the reporter to fool you, and then they even tell you in the video what you should see in it. Find the original clip, it is different.
That's not edited.  That's the real BBC airing as it happened, I watched it not long after it aired.  That's the original footage buddy.  That fact is not actually disputed by anyone.  You're the first on that I've seen.  Yea, you find the original clip and show us that it's different lol....  BULLSHIT!!!  It's the same!
Report to moderator   Logged
bighead
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1095


Getbig!


« Reply #42 on: September 30, 2012, 06:01:09 AM »

I think it's safe to say, the reporter vid is completely irrelevant to the truther argument/case.  
I wouldnt go so far as to say irrelevant but food for thought and I never claimed it to be a smoking gun, hence the topic being phrased as a ? and not a !. I further still wouldnt claim Lucky Larry's convenient doctors visit that morning or even his ''pull it'' comment as an AGH HA! moment, but I have a feeling something very wrong is going on.
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20679


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #43 on: September 30, 2012, 08:19:26 AM »

I wouldnt go so far as to say irrelevant but food for thought and I never claimed it to be a smoking gun, hence the topic being phrased as a ? and not a !. I further still wouldnt claim Lucky Larry's convenient doctors visit that morning or even his ''pull it'' comment as an AGH HA! moment, but I have a feeling something very wrong is going on.

How is it relevant in any way in context of the questions I have been asking.  How does reporting it early serve any purpose what so ever?
Report to moderator   Logged
bighead
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1095


Getbig!


« Reply #44 on: September 30, 2012, 07:16:28 PM »

it doesnt, just an example from one of the myriad of strange goings on from that day.
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20679


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #45 on: September 30, 2012, 10:33:58 PM »

it doesnt, just an example from one of the myriad of strange goings on from that day.

If one is interested in the truth, then why bring it up in the first place?

Is it just rhetoric designed to fuel doubt?  If so, then it's intellectually dishonest.

Strange things happen everyday.  Reporters gaffe/mis report all the time.
Report to moderator   Logged
bighead
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1095


Getbig!


« Reply #46 on: October 02, 2012, 06:14:41 AM »

Is Michael Moore intellectually dishonest? or former gov. of Minnesota Jesse Ventura, who just used the same video/rhetoric as an example of 9-11 discrepencies last week on cnn's Pierce Morgan?
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20679


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #47 on: October 02, 2012, 09:47:24 PM »

Is Michael Moore intellectually dishonest? or former gov. of Minnesota Jesse Ventura, who just used the same video/rhetoric as an example of 9-11 discrepencies last week on cnn's Pierce Morgan?

Yes, if he's using it as part of an argument that 911 was an inside job considering that there is no purpose to it and it only sways the less intelligent.
Report to moderator   Logged
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1229


« Reply #48 on: October 02, 2012, 10:54:08 PM »

That's not edited.  That's the real BBC airing as it happened, I watched it not long after it aired.  That's the original footage buddy.  That fact is not actually disputed by anyone.  You're the first on that I've seen.  Yea, you find the original clip and show us that it's different lol....  BULLSHIT!!!  It's the same!

There is also bigger picture which also shot down this video. All claims from truth.org about the demolition of the WTC7 are based on lie, that WTC7 collapse went down with enormous speed. Lie is based on the video, which shows only little part of the collapse. If you watch the video where is also the collapse of the penthouse section, you see A. that collapse last altogether much longer than they claim, and B. that facade and the front side of the building went down 10 seconds before the backside. So, if all and everything proves that WTC7 went down because the WTC1 collapse against it and break down the building, do this BBC-nonsense mean anything in this matter? And please tell me why they put together that BBC-clip and the clip with fake explosions? Are they seeking the truth by false evidence, or are they lying to you?
Report to moderator   Logged
crownshep
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3073


Getbig!


« Reply #49 on: October 05, 2012, 05:18:43 AM »

Only a slight reference to WTC 7 in this docu,but it investigates the reasons why people think 911 was an inside job.This was on a tv channel here in the uK yesterday,and the main things that interested me were the gulf of tonkin references and the northwoods operation.Just goes to show you that your own government has no qualms about killing its own citizens.Plus the interviews with the guys who worked for halliburton who said that when a truck blew a tyre,instead of changing the tyre they were told to set fire to the truck and just order a brand new truck.After all,it was the american taxpayer who was paying for it.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1aQGa2HwSk" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1aQGa2HwSk</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!