LOL so the fact that he follows your quote with my quote still means he doesnt support going into pakistan?
ooorrrr do you think it means that he doesnt support publicly stating that our intentions are to go into pakistan?
This will be very telling for you true ass hat, I wont hold my breath for you though as ive seen the depths of your retardation.
Its consistent that he did not support going into Pakistan, a nation he considered an ally and sovereign, in order to get Bin Laden (even if acting on credible intelligence).
Perhaps he feels differently now, but not at that time.
I guess the good thing about Mitt Romney is that he has had all positions at one time or another. That either means he is open to new evidence, doesn`t necessarily stick with his dogmatic principles (can be a good thing), or that he is clueless and just says whatever he thinks is necessary at the time.
Which one do you think it is? I can`t tell.