Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
December 18, 2014, 06:52:38 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 2012 Olympia - The Mr. Olympia scorecard  (Read 6224 times)
Secret Stack
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1677


« Reply #25 on: September 30, 2012, 10:35:25 AM »

Like the previous comments have mentioned,the scorecard i posted is from the NPC website.It was posted on facebook by Andy Coulson,EFBB judge and dorians training partner.Things that make you hhmmmm.

there is still a small glitch with the npc website. check this out before it gets edited...

you will notice the same scorecard ron has posted, correct? ---> http://npcnewsonline.com/2012-mr-olympia-final-results/33833/screen-shot-2012-09-30-at-9-17-45-am/

but now click on the image of the scorecard that you see come up in that link and tell me what shows up...

 Cheesy Shocked it' still up....

Report to moderator   Logged
PJim
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3409


I took my potatoes down to be mashed.


« Reply #26 on: September 30, 2012, 10:37:35 AM »


Fucking bullshit
Report to moderator   Logged
crownshep
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3074


Getbig!


« Reply #27 on: September 30, 2012, 10:41:26 AM »

wOW,now that is strange,and if you notice every competitor has a worse score on the "updated" version,except Phil and Kai,they have a better score.So just suppose the iFBB say one is from judging,the other is from the nighttime show,then how come everyones numbers haven`t changed.
Report to moderator   Logged
crownshep
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3074


Getbig!


« Reply #28 on: September 30, 2012, 10:48:23 AM »

Could we have uncovered Scorecardgate. Grin Grin
Report to moderator   Logged
Ron
Getbigistrator
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 9688


Getbig!


« Reply #29 on: September 30, 2012, 02:53:40 PM »

ron, i dont want to get out of line here, i am simply stating the facts, but the npconline news website were the ones that originally posted the scorecard with wolf in 5th and branch in 6th.  it was in this link here that this scorecard could be found. JUST NOW, the same link has JUST been edited to show an updated scorecard that makes branch 5th and wolf 6th:

That is the problem with taking a pic of a paper that obviously is not the scorecard. Phil Heath with 14 points? That doesn't make sense, and so on.  They had the results and scorecard at the finals where Bob read them.  One simple look at it, and you can tell it was not anything but a computer spreadsheet gone haywire, and a 'picture' that was taken, hence why it is dark. Oh well, the official scorecard is up now.
Report to moderator   Logged
PJim
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3409


I took my potatoes down to be mashed.


« Reply #30 on: September 30, 2012, 02:59:48 PM »

That is the problem with taking a pic of a paper that obviously is not the scorecard. Phil Heath with 14 points? That doesn't make sense, and so on.  They had the results and scorecard at the finals where Bob read them.  One simple look at it, and you can tell it was not anything but a computer spreadsheet gone haywire, and a 'picture' that was taken, hence why it is dark. Oh well, the official scorecard is up now.

Ah, the old haywire spreadsheet. Damn you again Microsoft Excel!
Report to moderator   Logged
MB
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2313


« Reply #31 on: September 30, 2012, 03:50:48 PM »

That is the problem with taking a pic of a paper that obviously is not the scorecard. Phil Heath with 14 points? That doesn't make sense, and so on.  They had the results and scorecard at the finals where Bob read them.  One simple look at it, and you can tell it was not anything but a computer spreadsheet gone haywire, and a 'picture' that was taken, hence why it is dark. Oh well, the official scorecard is up now.

So, there are unofficial spreadsheets being printed off at the judges table?  Judging by their inability to format the cells and allowing this non-sensical sheet to be printed, how do we know that the official results made their way up to Bob? 
Report to moderator   Logged
jude2
Competitors II
Getbig V
******
Posts: 6101

Getbig!


« Reply #32 on: September 30, 2012, 04:32:03 PM »

This is interesting.
Report to moderator   Logged
deceiver
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2660


onetimehard appreciation team


« Reply #33 on: October 01, 2012, 06:36:29 AM »

That is the problem with taking a pic of a paper that obviously is not the scorecard. Phil Heath with 14 points? That doesn't make sense, and so on.  They had the results and scorecard at the finals where Bob read them.  One simple look at it, and you can tell it was not anything but a computer spreadsheet gone haywire, and a 'picture' that was taken, hence why it is dark. Oh well, the official scorecard is up now.

Ron, it does not matter if it makes sense or not, from what I understand npconline is an official NPC site hence it is directly related to IFBB. To make it as simple as possible I will henceforth call "fake" scorecard "old" scorecard and "official" one "new".

 - Who and why created old scorecard?
 - How on earth this (old scorecard) got to the official NPC website?
 - Why can't multi-million dolar organisation afford a guy who can, for fuck's sake, use excel? This is really embarassing.
Report to moderator   Logged
Wiggs
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 31865


Child of Y'srael


« Reply #34 on: October 01, 2012, 07:17:46 AM »

Stop the bullshit Ron, you know what's up. Roll Eyes
Report to moderator   Logged

7
Dr.Mabuse
Getbig II
**
Posts: 24


« Reply #35 on: October 01, 2012, 07:24:22 AM »


These are the scores before the highest and lowest marks are dropped.

This tells us the judges had Phil in 1st position across the board.

It also shows us how close it was between Dennis and Branch (mind boggling, but there you have it.)

I think this system needs some refinement.  What must Wolf be thinking right now?
Report to moderator   Logged
crownshep
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3074


Getbig!


« Reply #36 on: October 01, 2012, 08:00:53 AM »

None of this takes away the fact the original pic is a photograph of the judges scoresheet,the "updated" scoresheet is something done on a computer.Some shenanigans being done here on Branchs behalf.
Report to moderator   Logged
jude2
Competitors II
Getbig V
******
Posts: 6101

Getbig!


« Reply #37 on: October 01, 2012, 07:04:10 PM »

That is the problem with taking a pic of a paper that obviously is not the scorecard. Phil Heath with 14 points? That doesn't make sense, and so on.  They had the results and scorecard at the finals where Bob read them.  One simple look at it, and you can tell it was not anything but a computer spreadsheet gone haywire, and a 'picture' that was taken, hence why it is dark. Oh well, the official scorecard is up now.
Ron Phil's score of 14 makes perfect sense. They had 11 judges, they drop 4 scores the top and bottom two. That is 7 points for each round is a total of 14.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!