What's better, to starve yourself and do nothing all day, or eat a bunch and do countless repetitions of laborious movements?
Suppose both strategies are employed to create a caloric deficit, equilibrium, or surplus depending on ones goals. Which is better?
Seems like most women choose the former all day, but might they be better served by the latter?
As time goes on, I can't help but feel like minimizing one's energy input and output results in a corpse-like feeling and, eventually, appearance. I wonder if all these dieting moms could finally shed the blubber and find success if they stopped worrying so much about how many points their imitation creme puff is worth and started worrying about how many bodyweight squats / hours of standing / lawns mowed / 800 lb deadlifts they could do?
please give your opinion on this matter.