|
dj181
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: October 29, 2012, 03:04:36 AM » |
|
Oh brother
guess he must come fom the mythical land of built studs  FYI, this fellas level of conditioning puts him in the top 1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
BigCyp
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: October 29, 2012, 03:21:04 AM » |
|
guess he must come fom the mythical land of built studs  FYI, this fellas level of conditioning puts him in the top 1% The responses threads like these get, cement my belief that 75% of posters here have never dieted down in their lives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dj181
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: October 29, 2012, 03:30:50 AM » |
|
The responses threads like these get, cement my belief that 75% of posters here have never dieted down in their lives.
or trained very hard
|
|
|
|
|
|
hipolito mejia
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: October 29, 2012, 06:09:08 AM » |
|
It's the look, too dry, too dense.
He has pro conditioning. You can be considerably bigger than that natty, but striated glutes, triceps. good luck.
QFT.
|
|
|
|
|
avxo
Getbig IV
   
Gender: 
Posts: 2050
New Avatar. Same Guy.
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: October 29, 2012, 10:25:18 AM » |
|
nah, thsi is impressve even if he used steroids, and such bodies when they stand infront of you, appear much bigger than one would think.
we have this one guy in the gym, who isnt natural btw,lol,who looks something close to this year round.whenever the guy walks by, i have to admit it looks goddamn impressive, certainly more impressive than a bulker fatso who actually is big.
when you see the muscle fibres moving under the skin, it has a certain shock factor.
that said, this guy is nowhere near natural. I agree that it's impressive whether he used steroids or not. In fact that's what I said in my first sentence: "That's an impressive level of shredded, natural or not." As for appearing larger in real-life, perhaps he does. I can only go by what I see in the picture. And from the picture and speaking for myself I said that find this type of physique a bit too twinky and that's why if I were him, I'd gain a bit of weight and try for a more bulked-up look. To each their own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heywood
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: October 29, 2012, 10:50:58 AM » |
|
shredded glutes and natural ?  this....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heywood
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: October 29, 2012, 10:52:52 AM » |
|
The size is more than attainable.
The definition, that would need to pass a test or two.....IMO, not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hazbin
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: October 29, 2012, 10:59:01 AM » |
|
me at 15 (1979)
|
|
|
|
|
|
dj181
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: October 29, 2012, 11:02:26 AM » |
|
me at 15 (1979)
what was your height and weight there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
hazbin
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: October 29, 2012, 11:33:48 AM » |
|
what was your height and weight there?
i don't remember off hand, but i do have detailed files (spoken in terminator voice) lmao. ya, i was pretty into lifting when i was a kid. i should be able to look up the stats tonite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dj181
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: October 29, 2012, 11:47:00 AM » |
|
i don't remember off hand, but i do have detailed files (spoken in terminator voice) lmao. ya, i was pretty into lifting when i was a kid. i should be able to look up the stats tonite.
you already had the lats there man  did you get those from rows, deads, chins or all 3? something tells me that your dead was your best lift out of the 3 powerlifts (squat, bench, dead) at that point in time, am i right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
oenguinseatsocks
|
 |
« Reply #61 on: October 29, 2012, 11:53:51 AM » |
|
me at 15 (1979)
oh fuck you to hell
|
|
|
|
|
|
FitnessFrenzy
|
 |
« Reply #62 on: October 29, 2012, 11:54:28 AM » |
|
sick lats on the young hazbin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hazbin
|
 |
« Reply #63 on: October 29, 2012, 11:57:39 AM » |
|
you already had the lats there man  did you get those from rows, deads, chins or all 3? something tells me that your dead was your best lift out of the 3 powerlifts (squat, bench, dead) at that point in time, am i right? from 12 - 15 my primary focus was the clean and jerk. i didn't have a bench or squat rack, so that was my focus. as a kid my feet hardly touched the ground. i was always hanging off or climbing up something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
prizm
|
 |
« Reply #64 on: October 29, 2012, 12:18:05 PM » |
|
That level of conditioning is attainable with out drugs of any kind.
This ^ Look at the contest prep section on BB.com. Dozens of twinks with shredded glutes Robbie placed 7th this weekend btw.   This all natural specimen won the overall  Too bad he popped for deca in 2002. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moen
|
 |
« Reply #65 on: October 29, 2012, 12:22:31 PM » |
|
That level of conditioning is attainable with out drugs of any kind.
Yep. But if he is 188 lbs at 6 2 he isn't clean. That's just too much muscle to be clean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hazbin
|
 |
« Reply #66 on: October 29, 2012, 12:33:46 PM » |
|
but youre not black, how comes?  racist post self reported  haha, i knew that was coming!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
MB
|
 |
« Reply #67 on: October 29, 2012, 12:37:08 PM » |
|
Yep. But if he is 188 lbs at 6 2 he isn't clean. That's just too much muscle to be clean.
188 lbs at 6'2" is pretty much a tooth pick. If you use 7 lbs/inch, the equivalent 5'9" man would weigh 153 lbs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
prizm
|
 |
« Reply #68 on: October 29, 2012, 12:39:25 PM » |
|
Yep. But if he is 188 lbs at 6 2 he isn't clean. That's just too much muscle to be clean.
He's well within range on the gh15 liar guide.  Also, isn't 5'10 170 generally accepted as being natural in stage condition? And something like ~5lbs for every inch above/below that? Seems reasonable. Looks a dude on the swim team in a t-shirt 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moen
|
 |
« Reply #69 on: October 29, 2012, 12:41:35 PM » |
|
188 lbs at 6'2" is pretty much a tooth pick. If you use 7 lbs/inch, the equivalent 5'9" man would weigh 153 lbs.
Check his pics, he's very lean, it's all muscle. Definitely not clean and not possible naturally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moen
|
 |
« Reply #70 on: October 29, 2012, 12:42:22 PM » |
|
He's well within range on the gh15 liar guide.  Also, isn't 5'10 170 generally accepted as being natural in stage condition? And something like ~5lbs for every inch above/below that? Seems reasonable. Looks a dude on the swim team in a t-shirt  Many juiced up pro bodybuilders of the past look like regular people in clothes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
prizm
|
 |
« Reply #71 on: October 29, 2012, 12:43:37 PM » |
|
Many juiced up pro bodybuilders of the past look like regular people in clothes.
True
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moen
|
 |
« Reply #72 on: October 29, 2012, 12:44:27 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_bruce_
|
 |
« Reply #73 on: October 29, 2012, 12:51:45 PM » |
|
 As natural as jeff rodriguez and pat banana Looking great Raymondo.
|
[
|
|
|
|