Take away the gun and he would have stabbed her. Take away the knife and he would have bludgeoned her with a hammer. Take away the hammer and he would have choked her. The point being, the man had malice on his mind and would have found a way to kill, gun or no gun.
Exactly! Why don't/can't the people crying about guns understand this?
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
According to many on this site, the Constitution was/is meant to be re-written to suit agendas.
The how come in areas where gun laws are stricter, murder rates are sky high?! Detroit, Washington DC, Chicago....and the list goes on and on.
Possibly one reason is that the stricter laws make it more difficult for law-abiding folks to defend themselves, while it is primarily CRIMINALS who are left with guns.
Krank is spot on. Liberals are responsible for the pussification of America.
They're not the only ones, but they're the principal ones.
Stricter gun laws? They're already strict enough and there are existing laws in the books.
The problem with guns is the illegal ownership of them by criminals.
Look up the stats of gun crimes committed by law abiding citizens...very few.
Nothing more needs to be said here. This is the BASIC TRUTH.
Only a delusionite thinks that more and stricter gun laws will solve our problems.
guns dont kill people
guns are a tool used for killing
90% of household objects can be used as tools for killing
You can also kill someone with your bare hands. Maybe we should impose stricter laws on hands.
There is already a law against murder on the books. If someone won't obey that law, why would they obey laws banning guns?
Again, basic truth.
Only an idiot would argue against this.