SEAN HANNITY LOSES HALF OF HIS AUDIENCE AFTER OBAMA WIN

[Hugo Chavez]

That's funny! According to TVbythenumbers.com, Hannity still beats Maddow at the 9pm slot.

For example,


Dec. 20: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.3 million
Dec. 19: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.4 million
Dec. 18: Hannity - 1.8 million; Maddow - 1.1 million
Dec. 17: Hannity - 1.6 million; Maddow - 1.2 million
Dec. 14: Hannity - 2.5 million; Maddow - 1.2 million
Dec. 13: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.3 million

My guess is you quoted a source that only counts the 25-54 demographic, which (in some cases) Maddow was ahead of Hannity, particularly shortly after the election. But, Hannity still had the lead overall and has hardly lost 50% of his audience, according to these numbers.

This is hardly the first time the left has used this tactic, with regards to promoting MSNBC shows. But, after a couple of months or so, the Fox shows go back on top in that demo, while still staying on top overall.

Is there some way we could send them both, Hannity and Madcow, to the Hadron Collider for an experiment to search for the shithead particle?  Collide them both at high speed type of shit?  I would pay per view for that.

[333386]

I'm not going to dispute your analysis.....I only do tons of research on topics that are near and dear to my heart....this wasn't that important to me, and I as just throwing out a topic of conversation...I simply stated that Hannity had lost 50% of his audience and that Rachel Maddow is now beating him a lot of the time...it wasn't meant to be a thesis....

But the fact is that the Republican pundits have been thoroughly destroyed in terms of their credibility.....not so much for being wrong but due to their being so incredibly smug in their predictions and then being sore losers afterwards

Many people are fed up w politics and there is nothing we can do for awhile about that ghetto maggot and her husband at 1600 pa ave.   you voted for communism now tu got it.

[chadstallion]

mission unsuccessful........go back to your old routine of masturbating to gay porn sites

i was just doing that butt came back here to see the latest info.

[333386]

i was just doing that butt came back here to see the latest info.

Go back to banging dudes at truck stops. 

[Straw Man]

Many people are fed up w politics and there is nothing we can do for awhile about that ghetto maggot and her husband at 1600 pa ave.   you voted for communism now tu got it.

no one voted communist and the only ghetto maggots are in your neighborhood

[24KT]

I can't watch either show. That Rachael lady is by far the most annoying person allowed to have a TV show. Hannity isn't far behind.

You clearly have never seen Nancy Grace. 

[Purge_WTF]

You clearly have never seen Nancy Grace. 

 Heh, true. At least Sean and Rachel get laid every once in a while.

[tu_holmes]

I can't watch either show. That Rachael lady is by far the most annoying person allowed to have a TV show. Hannity isn't far behind.

Chris Matthews... How does everyone forget that he's THE ABSOLUTE WORST... God I hate that guy.

[chadstallion]

Go back to banging dudes at truck stops. 

hey, don;'t give away all our secret meeting places!!!! 

[Grape Ape]

I don't think an unsourced, factually incorrect claim should be the basis of a thread.

It's never stopped him before.

[240 is Back]

Dec. 20: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.3 million
Dec. 19: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.4 million
Dec. 18: Hannity - 1.8 million; Maddow - 1.1 million
Dec. 17: Hannity - 1.6 million; Maddow - 1.2 million
Dec. 14: Hannity - 2.5 million; Maddow - 1.2 million
Dec. 13: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.3 million

woah.

[andreisdaman]

Chris Matthews... How does everyone forget that he's THE ABSOLUTE WORST... God I hate that guy.

I can see your point on this

[andreisdaman]

You clearly have never seen Nancy Grace. 

very nice point.....you deserve a kiss for this one

[333386]

I can see your point on this

Christine Matthews is the perfect example of a white liberal panzie commie dirtbag I talk about.  Worst of the worst. 

[andreisdaman]

I don't think an unsourced, factually incorrect claim should be the basis of a thread. Andre, can you modify your original post?

there would be no threads in getbig if that standard were applied...but here




http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/sean_hannity_lost_half_his_tv_audience_after_the_election/

http://www.ibtimes.com/why-sean-hannity-lost-half-his-viewers-rachel-maddow-didnt-989788

http://www.newshounds.us/sean_hannity_s_ratings_cratered_after_the_election_01022012

[syntaxmachine]

there would be no threads in getbig if that standard were applied...but here




http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/sean_hannity_lost_half_his_tv_audience_after_the_election/

http://www.ibtimes.com/why-sean-hannity-lost-half-his-viewers-rachel-maddow-didnt-989788

http://www.newshounds.us/sean_hannity_s_ratings_cratered_after_the_election_01022012

It facilitates argument ("discussion") if you link to such items in the OPs of the threads you create. 3333 does this, even though most of his content is imaginary; surely you can do the same.

[andreisdaman]

It facilitates argument ("discussion") if you link to such items in the OPs of the threads you create. 3333 does this, even though most of his content is imaginary; surely you can do the same.

uh oh...another 3333 defender......linking your mind to his is not a good idea dude...

[syntaxmachine]

uh oh...another 3333 defender......linking your mind to his is not a good idea dude...

If you ever decide to read my posts you'll see that what you're saying is absurd. I'm simply pointing out that despite the content of his posts, he links to sources, as should everyone else.

[andreisdaman]

Hmm, if you ever decide to read my posts you'll see what you're saying is absurd. I'm simply pointing out that despite the content of his posts, he inks to sources, as should everyone else.

my apologies..you are right about the contenets of your posts...however, have you ever really loooked at his sources???..they are not exactly topnotch..they are often people's blogs and crazy guys on youtube.

[MCWAY]

my apologies..you are right about the contenets of your posts...however, have you ever really loooked at his sources???..they are not exactly topnotch..they are often people's blogs and crazy guys on youtube.

Your sources aren't "topnotch", either. All of them are left-winged editorials, which I knew from the start. And, it appears that the other two just parroted what was written in Salon.

Notice that they don't cite the actual numbers to show this alleged drop by 50% on Hannity's end.

"Why Hannity Lost Half Of His Viewers And Rachel Maddow Didn't"? PLEASE!!! That is a bald-faced lie, undoubtedly perpetrated to advance the wishful thinking that Obama's re-election spells the end for Fox News as cable news' top dog.

Anyone who follows the ratings knows that Hannity normally DOES NOT amass 3.6 million viewers. His numbers usually range between 1.7 to 2 million a night. In other words, after the election, things simply returned to normal.

Furthermore, Hannity has NEVER advanced a narrative that Romney would win in a landslide. How many times did Hannity go on the show and say Republicans need to act like it's the 4th quarter and they're down two TDs? How many times did Hannity plea with voters to show up (which, at least as the GOP base goes, they didn't; hence Obama won)?

Yes, he had Rove and Morris, who made such pics. He also had Pat Caddel, who said Romney ran the worst campaign he'd ever seen. He had Scott Rasmussen who said it'd be close and that Romney could possibly win the popular vote but lose the election.

He had Larry Sabato, who picked Obama to win at least 290 EC votes. And, that's the short list.



The guy who wrote the IBT article acts as if 3.6 million is standard fare for Hannity. Heck, even O'Reilly doesn't hit that mark on a regular basis. And, he's been the top cable news guy for 12 years.

[dario73]

Cable News Ratings for Thursday, January 3, 2013


Net 9PM                                   P2+ (000s)  25-54 (000s)  35-64 (000s)
FNC Hannity                                1,740             357             703
CNN Piers Morgan Tonight               433             127             158
MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show       1,189             334             590
CNBC BILLIONS BEHIND BARS         287            151             182
HLN WHAT WOULD YOU DO             283            126             155
   
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/01/04/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-january-3-2013/163793/

[240 is Back]

CNN + MSNBC > FOX.

Interesting.  There's only one conservative news network.  There are a few POS lib netowrks that split up viewers.

That means conservative viewers clearly are outnumbered by libbies.

interesting.

[MCWAY]

CNN + MSNBC > FOX.

Interesting.  There's only one conservative news network.  There are a few POS lib netowrks that split up viewers.

That means conservative viewers clearly are outnumbered by libbies.

interesting.

There may be two, if Glenn Beck can get his mits on one. He failed to get Current TV from Al Gore. Maybe he's waiting for OWN to go belly up.

Plus, you assume that, if CNN/HLN were go away, their viewers would all automatically go to MSNBC.

[240 is Back]

There may be two, if Glenn Beck can get his mits on one. He failed to get Current TV from Al Gore. Maybe he's waiting for OWN to go belly up.

Plus, you assume that, if CNN/HLN were go away, their viewers would all automatically go to MSNBC.

lol @ conservatives who watch CNN.  That many of them, huh?  and they also vote obama, seeing the recent election results.

So they vote dem and watch dem, but conservatives are the majority?

[MCWAY]

lol @ conservatives who watch CNN.  That many of them, huh?  and they also vote obama, seeing the recent election results.

So they vote dem and watch dem, but conservatives are the majority?

If CNN were gone, perhaps some of those folks would either watch something else entirely.

I never said most would go to Fox (a handful might).

According to a 2009 poll that Pew Research did. Fox News viewers are 39% Republican, 33% Democrat, and 22% Independent.

CNN - 51% Dem, 18% GOP, 27% Independent;
MSNBC - 47% Dems, 18% GOP, 27% Independent.