Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
November 23, 2014, 07:57:23 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: SEAN HANNITY LOSES HALF OF HIS AUDIENCE AFTER OBAMA WIN  (Read 3615 times)
Hugo Chavez
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 31873


« Reply #25 on: January 01, 2013, 08:15:22 AM »

That's funny! According to TVbythenumbers.com, Hannity still beats Maddow at the 9pm slot.

For example,


Dec. 20: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.3 million
Dec. 19: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.4 million
Dec. 18: Hannity - 1.8 million; Maddow - 1.1 million
Dec. 17: Hannity - 1.6 million; Maddow - 1.2 million
Dec. 14: Hannity - 2.5 million; Maddow - 1.2 million
Dec. 13: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.3 million

My guess is you quoted a source that only counts the 25-54 demographic, which (in some cases) Maddow was ahead of Hannity, particularly shortly after the election. But, Hannity still had the lead overall and has hardly lost 50% of his audience, according to these numbers.

This is hardly the first time the left has used this tactic, with regards to promoting MSNBC shows. But, after a couple of months or so, the Fox shows go back on top in that demo, while still staying on top overall.
Is there some way we could send them both, Hannity and Madcow, to the Hadron Collider for an experiment to search for the shithead particle?  Collide them both at high speed type of shit?  I would pay per view for that. Grin
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 10051


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #26 on: January 01, 2013, 11:13:13 AM »

I'm not going to dispute your analysis.....I only do tons of research on topics that are near and dear to my heart....this wasn't that important to me, and I as just throwing out a topic of conversation...I simply stated that Hannity had lost 50% of his audience and that Rachel Maddow is now beating him a lot of the time...it wasn't meant to be a thesis....

But the fact is that the Republican pundits have been thoroughly destroyed in terms of their credibility.....not so much for being wrong but due to their being so incredibly smug in their predictions and then being sore losers afterwards


Many people are fed up w politics and there is nothing we can do for awhile about that ghetto maggot and her husband at 1600 pa ave.   you voted for communism now tu got it.
Report to moderator   Logged
chadstallion
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2450



« Reply #27 on: January 03, 2013, 07:24:10 PM »

mission unsuccessful........go back to your old routine of masturbating to gay porn sites
i was just doing that butt came back here to see the latest info.
Report to moderator   Logged

Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 10051


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #28 on: January 03, 2013, 07:26:22 PM »

i was just doing that butt came back here to see the latest info.

Go back to banging dudes at truck stops. 
Report to moderator   Logged
Straw Man
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 25591


one dwells in nirvana


« Reply #29 on: January 03, 2013, 07:27:20 PM »


Many people are fed up w politics and there is nothing we can do for awhile about that ghetto maggot and her husband at 1600 pa ave.   you voted for communism now tu got it.

no one voted communist and the only ghetto maggots are in your neighborhood

Report to moderator   Logged
24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24462


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« Reply #30 on: January 04, 2013, 07:04:37 AM »

I can't watch either show. That Rachael lady is by far the most annoying person allowed to have a TV show. Hannity isn't far behind.

Cool

You clearly have never seen Nancy Grace.  Grin
Report to moderator   Logged

w
Purge_WTF
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5526


Constitution Party forever.


« Reply #31 on: January 04, 2013, 08:16:55 AM »

You clearly have never seen Nancy Grace.  Grin

 Heh, true. At least Sean and Rachel get laid every once in a while.
Report to moderator   Logged

Psalm 23.
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15970


Robot


WWW
« Reply #32 on: January 04, 2013, 09:39:57 AM »

I can't watch either show. That Rachael lady is by far the most annoying person allowed to have a TV show. Hannity isn't far behind.


Cool

Chris Matthews... How does everyone forget that he's THE ABSOLUTE WORST... God I hate that guy.
Report to moderator   Logged
chadstallion
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2450



« Reply #33 on: January 04, 2013, 09:15:07 PM »

Go back to banging dudes at truck stops. 
hey, don;'t give away all our secret meeting places!!!!  Grin
Report to moderator   Logged

Grape Ape
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7224


Alphamod / Y board approved


« Reply #34 on: January 04, 2013, 09:54:00 PM »

I don't think an unsourced, factually incorrect claim should be the basis of a thread.

It's never stopped him before.

Report to moderator   Logged

Y
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 84833


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« Reply #35 on: January 04, 2013, 10:35:03 PM »

Dec. 20: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.3 million
Dec. 19: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.4 million
Dec. 18: Hannity - 1.8 million; Maddow - 1.1 million
Dec. 17: Hannity - 1.6 million; Maddow - 1.2 million
Dec. 14: Hannity - 2.5 million; Maddow - 1.2 million
Dec. 13: Hannity - 1.9 million; Maddow - 1.3 million


woah.
Report to moderator   Logged

andreisdaman
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 11207


« Reply #36 on: January 05, 2013, 06:22:21 AM »

Chris Matthews... How does everyone forget that he's THE ABSOLUTE WORST... God I hate that guy.

I can see your point on this
Report to moderator   Logged
andreisdaman
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 11207


« Reply #37 on: January 05, 2013, 06:23:05 AM »

You clearly have never seen Nancy Grace.  Grin

very nice point.....you deserve a kiss for this one Kiss
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 10051


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #38 on: January 05, 2013, 06:25:42 AM »

I can see your point on this

Christine Matthews is the perfect example of a white liberal panzie commie dirtbag I talk about.  Worst of the worst. 
Report to moderator   Logged
andreisdaman
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 11207


« Reply #39 on: January 05, 2013, 06:28:21 AM »

I don't think an unsourced, factually incorrect claim should be the basis of a thread. Andre, can you modify your original post?

there would be no threads in getbig if that standard were applied...but here




http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/sean_hannity_lost_half_his_tv_audience_after_the_election/

http://www.ibtimes.com/why-sean-hannity-lost-half-his-viewers-rachel-maddow-didnt-989788

http://www.newshounds.us/sean_hannity_s_ratings_cratered_after_the_election_01022012
Report to moderator   Logged
syntaxmachine
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2533



« Reply #40 on: January 05, 2013, 06:37:37 AM »


It facilitates argument ("discussion") if you link to such items in the OPs of the threads you create. 3333 does this, even though most of his content is imaginary; surely you can do the same.
Report to moderator   Logged
andreisdaman
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 11207


« Reply #41 on: January 05, 2013, 06:42:41 AM »

It facilitates argument ("discussion") if you link to such items in the OPs of the threads you create. 3333 does this, even though most of his content is imaginary; surely you can do the same.

uh oh...another 3333 defender......linking your mind to his is not a good idea dude...
Report to moderator   Logged
syntaxmachine
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2533



« Reply #42 on: January 05, 2013, 07:17:44 AM »

uh oh...another 3333 defender......linking your mind to his is not a good idea dude...

If you ever decide to read my posts you'll see that what you're saying is absurd. I'm simply pointing out that despite the content of his posts, he links to sources, as should everyone else.
Report to moderator   Logged
andreisdaman
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 11207


« Reply #43 on: January 05, 2013, 10:21:18 AM »

Hmm, if you ever decide to read my posts you'll see what you're saying is absurd. I'm simply pointing out that despite the content of his posts, he inks to sources, as should everyone else.

my apologies..you are right about the contenets of your posts...however, have you ever really loooked at his sources???..they are not exactly topnotch..they are often people's blogs and crazy guys on youtube.
Report to moderator   Logged
MCWAY
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 16084


Getbig!


« Reply #44 on: January 05, 2013, 02:47:45 PM »

my apologies..you are right about the contenets of your posts...however, have you ever really loooked at his sources???..they are not exactly topnotch..they are often people's blogs and crazy guys on youtube.

Your sources aren't "topnotch", either. All of them are left-winged editorials, which I knew from the start. And, it appears that the other two just parroted what was written in Salon.

Notice that they don't cite the actual numbers to show this alleged drop by 50% on Hannity's end.

"Why Hannity Lost Half Of His Viewers And Rachel Maddow Didn't"? PLEASE!!! That is a bald-faced lie, undoubtedly perpetrated to advance the wishful thinking that Obama's re-election spells the end for Fox News as cable news' top dog.

Anyone who follows the ratings knows that Hannity normally DOES NOT amass 3.6 million viewers. His numbers usually range between 1.7 to 2 million a night. In other words, after the election, things simply returned to normal.

Furthermore, Hannity has NEVER advanced a narrative that Romney would win in a landslide. How many times did Hannity go on the show and say Republicans need to act like it's the 4th quarter and they're down two TDs? How many times did Hannity plea with voters to show up (which, at least as the GOP base goes, they didn't; hence Obama won)?

Yes, he had Rove and Morris, who made such pics. He also had Pat Caddel, who said Romney ran the worst campaign he'd ever seen. He had Scott Rasmussen who said it'd be close and that Romney could possibly win the popular vote but lose the election.

He had Larry Sabato, who picked Obama to win at least 290 EC votes. And, that's the short list.



The guy who wrote the IBT article acts as if 3.6 million is standard fare for Hannity. Heck, even O'Reilly doesn't hit that mark on a regular basis. And, he's been the top cable news guy for 12 years.





Report to moderator   Logged
dario73
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 6332


Getbig!


« Reply #45 on: January 05, 2013, 08:19:30 PM »

Cable News Ratings for Thursday, January 3, 2013


Net 9PM                                   P2+ (000s)  25-54 (000s)  35-64 (000s)
FNC Hannity                                1,740             357             703
CNN Piers Morgan Tonight               433             127             158
MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show       1,189             334             590
CNBC BILLIONS BEHIND BARS         287            151             182
HLN WHAT WOULD YOU DO             283            126             155
   
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/01/04/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-january-3-2013/163793/
Report to moderator   Logged
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 84833


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« Reply #46 on: January 05, 2013, 09:11:58 PM »

CNN + MSNBC > FOX.

Interesting.  There's only one conservative news network.  There are a few POS lib netowrks that split up viewers.

That means conservative viewers clearly are outnumbered by libbies.

interesting.
Report to moderator   Logged

MCWAY
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 16084


Getbig!


« Reply #47 on: January 05, 2013, 09:16:06 PM »

CNN + MSNBC > FOX.

Interesting.  There's only one conservative news network.  There are a few POS lib netowrks that split up viewers.

That means conservative viewers clearly are outnumbered by libbies.

interesting.

There may be two, if Glenn Beck can get his mits on one. He failed to get Current TV from Al Gore. Maybe he's waiting for OWN to go belly up.

Plus, you assume that, if CNN/HLN were go away, their viewers would all automatically go to MSNBC.
Report to moderator   Logged
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 84833


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« Reply #48 on: January 05, 2013, 10:08:04 PM »

There may be two, if Glenn Beck can get his mits on one. He failed to get Current TV from Al Gore. Maybe he's waiting for OWN to go belly up.

Plus, you assume that, if CNN/HLN were go away, their viewers would all automatically go to MSNBC.

lol @ conservatives who watch CNN.  That many of them, huh?  and they also vote obama, seeing the recent election results.

So they vote dem and watch dem, but conservatives are the majority?

Report to moderator   Logged

MCWAY
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 16084


Getbig!


« Reply #49 on: January 05, 2013, 10:16:23 PM »

lol @ conservatives who watch CNN.  That many of them, huh?  and they also vote obama, seeing the recent election results.

So they vote dem and watch dem, but conservatives are the majority?



If CNN were gone, perhaps some of those folks would either watch something else entirely.

I never said most would go to Fox (a handful might).

According to a 2009 poll that Pew Research did. Fox News viewers are 39% Republican, 33% Democrat, and 22% Independent.

CNN - 51% Dem, 18% GOP, 27% Independent;
MSNBC - 47% Dems, 18% GOP, 27% Independent.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!