Author Topic: First Facebook now Instagram (Read 3997 times)

Big N · « **on:** February 07, 2013, 01:45:31 PM »

Murdered Staten Island mom, and wife Sarai Sierra had sex with me, says Turkish man she met online weeks before her death in Istanbul. “They didn’t have an emotional relationship,” lawyer Polat told the Daily News. “They were just friends. They met on the Internet photo sharing website.” Attorney Polat said the two met four months ago via the web, with Sierra telling Taylan about her plans to visit his country. Taylan was one of 24 people interviewed by cops and subjected to DNA and blood tests in the wake of Sierra's death. They include people who met Sierra via Instagram and homeless people known to hang out near the ancient city walls where her body was found Feb. 2, Kaplan said. Attorney Polat refused to answer when asked directly if Taylan slept with Sierra after the mother of two arrived in Turkey for a two-week solo getaway last month.

PS. Fellas be careful what you write to these broads on these online dating websites.

- Discuss

Archer77 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 07, 2013, 02:16:03 PM »

She put herself in a bad position. She doesn't deserve to be dead but should have thought a little harder about the decisions she was making

f450 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 07, 2013, 03:23:42 PM »

eat, pray, love ?

books aren't real life.... real life, real consequences.

RIP.

I blame Oprah.

Irongrip400 · « **Reply #3 on:** February 07, 2013, 03:26:19 PM »

Quote from: Archer77 on February 07, 2013, 02:16:03 PM

She put herself in a bad position. She doesn't deserve to be dead but should have thought a little harder about the decisions she was making

No shit, what the fuck is wrong with people.

Schmoff · « **Reply #4 on:** February 07, 2013, 03:28:41 PM »

muslim of peace

Archer77 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 07, 2013, 03:43:01 PM »

Quote from: Irongrip400 on February 07, 2013, 03:26:19 PM

No shit, what the fuck is wrong with people.

More concerned with feeding the ego because damn it, they are unique human beings who deserve it.

SilverSpoon · « **Reply #6 on:** February 07, 2013, 05:27:55 PM »

When Stella Getting Her Groove Back Goes Wrong...

WOOO · « **Reply #7 on:** February 07, 2013, 05:28:45 PM »

didn't read it, don't care, more vodka

Parker · « **Reply #8 on:** February 07, 2013, 05:32:17 PM »

Quote from: Irongrip400 on February 07, 2013, 03:26:19 PM

No shit, what the fuck is wrong with people.

Shhhh! Don't question what people do!

syntaxmachine · « **Reply #9 on:** February 08, 2013, 05:37:08 AM »

Facts: An unemployed, recently bankrupt, high school-educated woman takes an unprecedented (for her) and unusual overseas trip to Instanbul by herself, subsequently taking an unexplained one-day trip to Amsterdam to interact with a man she has never met before, returning to Istanbul to interact with another man she has never met before by a bridge, sometime later getting killed and dumped in a low-income district of the city -- all the while having multiple (at least two) cellphones.

I don't think the best explanation for this set of facts is that the woman suddenly got the urge to take photos outside of her usual setting and that her killing is random, unrelated to her online contact with unknown men and the subsequent pattern of behavior she exhibited on the basis of this contact. An aspiring drug runner perhaps?

G_Thang · « **Reply #10 on:** February 08, 2013, 05:52:47 AM »

american girls, if you want to run drugs, then do it in colombia.

there's actually an american woman in this prison, who went to colombia to run drugs for a guy and got busted at the airport.

what's the story? southern americans won't kill you, just imprison you.

must be nice to be a guard at this prison.

RJ DRIVER · « **Reply #11 on:** February 08, 2013, 06:21:46 AM »

Quote from: syntaxmachine on February 08, 2013, 05:37:08 AM

Facts: An unemployed, recently bankrupt, high school-educated woman takes an unprecedented (for her) and unusual overseas trip to Instanbul by herself, subsequently taking an unexplained one-day trip to Amsterdam to interact with a man she has never met before, returning to Istanbul to interact with another man she has never met before by a bridge, sometime later getting killed and dumped in a low-income district of the city -- all the while having multiple (at least two) cellphones.

I don't think the best explanation for this set of facts is that the woman suddenly got the urge to take photos outside of her usual setting and that her killing is random, unrelated to her online contact with unknown men and the subsequent pattern of behavior she exhibited on the basis of this contact. An aspiring drug runner perhaps?

Shit this sounds like a great story for "locked up abroad".

El Diablo Blanco · « **Reply #12 on:** February 08, 2013, 06:23:44 AM »

Instagram is facebook. Just another tool I refuse to use to help the Jews.

Bad Boy Dazza · « **Reply #13 on:** February 08, 2013, 06:23:53 AM »

Agreed. Many foolish women just like her.

Quote from: Archer77 on February 07, 2013, 02:16:03 PM

She put herself in a bad position. She doesn't deserve to be dead but should have thought a little harder about the decisions she was making

syntaxmachine · « **Reply #14 on:** February 08, 2013, 07:01:07 AM »

Quote from: syntaxmachine on February 08, 2013, 05:37:08 AM

I don't think the best explanation for this set of facts is that the woman suddenly got the urge to take photos outside of her usual setting and that her killing is random, unrelated to her online contact with unknown men and the subsequent pattern of behavior she exhibited on the basis of this contact. An aspiring drug runner perhaps?

Here are the salient peaks in 'Explanation Space,' the realm of possible explanations for what has occurred. The peaks differ in their handling of the two embedded propositions of the above paragraph (the clauses following the 'that' tokens).

(i) Affirm both propositions: the woman really did just decide to travel overseas for the first time to take pictures, and her killing really was unrelated to her contact/interactions with the unknown men.

(ii) Deny one proposition, affirm the other v1: The woman did not just decide to travel overseas for the first time to take pictures, but rather did so for an unknown reason. However, her killing was unrelated to her contact/interactions with the unknown men.

(iii) Deny one proposition, affirm the other v2: The woman really did just decide to travel overseas for the first time to take pictures, but her killing was somehow related to her contact/interactions with the unknown men.

(iv) Deny both propositions: The woman did not just decide to travel overseas for the first time to take pictures, but rather did so for an unknown reason, and her killing was somehow related to her contact/interactions with the unknown men.

(v) Wiggs-Falconian analysis: Aliens/the USG/the Illuminati did it.

Given the basic-most facts understood thus far, (iv) seems to me the most likely option. It seems to imply either that she was a drug runner or was otherwise involved in crime and that she was killed on this basis, or that she was there not to take pictures but to have a tryst or some other under-the-radar interaction with the man in Istanbul, and that he killed her. Which we opt for ought to be determined by her background, what investigators find on her cellphones, the content of her online interactions with the unknown men, and the their backgrounds.

quadzilla456 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 08, 2013, 07:26:24 AM »

Quote from: syntaxmachine on February 08, 2013, 05:37:08 AM

Facts: An unemployed, recently bankrupt, high school-educated woman takes an unprecedented (for her) and unusual overseas trip to Instanbul by herself, subsequently taking an unexplained one-day trip to Amsterdam to interact with a man she has never met before, returning to Istanbul to interact with another man she has never met before by a bridge, sometime later getting killed and dumped in a low-income district of the city -- all the while having multiple (at least two) cellphones.

I don't think the best explanation for this set of facts is that the woman suddenly got the urge to take photos outside of her usual setting and that her killing is random, unrelated to her online contact with unknown men and the subsequent pattern of behavior she exhibited on the basis of this contact. An aspiring drug runner perhaps?

From another site:

*UPDATE*

New York Post is breaking reports that upon reaching Turkey, she made contact with "criminal elements" that may have been connected to drug trafficking.

Suddenly, Ms. Sierra isn't looking so innocent any longer. And her bizarre "meeting strangers online" storyline could now be seen as something far more sinister than simply a innocent, naive woman making a stupid mistake.

Will be interesting to see when the Daily News finally catches up to the breaking-developments.

Nails · « **Reply #16 on:** February 08, 2013, 07:27:48 AM »

She has a jaw line that can not be trusted

Ronnie Rep · « **Reply #17 on:** February 08, 2013, 07:32:53 AM »

Drug runner!

syntaxmachine · « **Reply #18 on:** February 08, 2013, 08:14:49 AM »

Quote from: quadzilla456 on February 08, 2013, 07:26:24 AM

From another site:

*UPDATE*

New York Post is breaking reports that upon reaching Turkey, she made contact with "criminal elements" that may have been connected to drug trafficking.

Suddenly, Ms. Sierra isn't looking so innocent any longer. And her bizarre "meeting strangers online" storyline could now be seen as something far more sinister than simply a innocent, naive woman making a stupid mistake.

Will be interesting to see when the Daily News finally catches up to the breaking-developments.

No woman deserves to be forced into a mortal struggle that results in her being "brutalized" and killed with "vicious head wounds" that leave her "virtually unrecognizable," and I'm sad that this has happened (quotes from the latest WP story). That said, she went out of her way (across a third of the globe) to get involved with criminal elements -- if indeed the 'criminal element' narrative is correct -- and thus the responsibility for exposure to such risk is firmly her own.

Right now, the most economical explanation is that the man she met online and apparently had sex with the day before her death is directly involved; however, it is possible that she fostered that relationship -- and the others the news has reported upon (e.g., the man in Amsterdam) -- entirely separately from the criminal links. What sucks is that her other phone was stolen, the very one that might have evidence of illicit ties.

I think that her being unemployed, recently bankrupt, and married to a bus driver and yet able to afford such a trip interesting. It may be that her entire family unit was already steeped in illicit activity. It's bizarre to me that the website for donations for her funeral -- written up by her brother -- explicitly states that she was there solely for taking photos. Why would he bother to mention that at all? It sounds paranoid and defensive, a reinforcement of a mutually constructed (or individually constructed but mutually reinforced), fictitious alibi.

Nails · « **Reply #19 on:** February 08, 2013, 08:34:14 AM »

Hoez always want to live beyond their means

looks like a Riki Lake wanna be

snx · « **Reply #20 on:** February 08, 2013, 08:46:19 AM »

Quote from: syntaxmachine on February 08, 2013, 07:01:07 AM

Here are the salient peaks in 'Explanation Space,' the realm of possible explanations for what has occurred. The peaks differ in their handling of the two embedded propositions of the above paragraph (the clauses following the 'that' tokens).

(i) Affirm both propositions: the woman really did just decide to travel overseas for the first time to take pictures, and her killing really was unrelated to her contact/interactions with the unknown men.

(ii) Deny one proposition, affirm the other v1: The woman did not just decide to travel overseas for the first time to take pictures, but rather did so for an unknown reason. However, her killing was unrelated to her contact/interactions with the unknown men.

(iii) Deny one proposition, affirm the other v2: The woman really did just decide to travel overseas for the first time to take pictures, but her killing was somehow related to her contact/interactions with the unknown men.

(iv) Deny both propositions: The woman did not just decide to travel overseas for the first time to take pictures, but rather did so for an unknown reason, and her killing was somehow related to her contact/interactions with the unknown men.

(v) Wiggs-Falconian analysis: Aliens/the USG/the Illuminati did it.

Given the basic-most facts understood thus far, (iv) seems to me the most likely option. It seems to imply either that she was a drug runner or was otherwise involved in crime and that she was killed on this basis, or that she was there not to take pictures but to have a tryst or some other under-the-radar interaction with the man in Istanbul, and that he killed her. Which we opt for ought to be determined by her background, what investigators find on her cellphones, the content of her online interactions with the unknown men, and the their backgrounds.

Option D