Author Topic: Obama goes after Colleges offering free Kindles as being discriminatory. WTF??  (Read 1308 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
DOJ Targeted Public Library for Lending E-Books 'Inaccessible' to the Blind



By Elizabeth Harrington

August 31, 2012

Subscribe to Elizabeth Harrington's posts





 
(CNSNews.com) – The U.S. Justice Department says it has reached a settlement with the Sacramento (California) Public Library over a trial program the library was conducting that let patrons borrow Barnes and Noble NOOK e-book readers.
 
DOJ and the National Federation of the Blind objected to the program on grounds that blind people could not use the NOOK e-readers for technological reasons.
 
The Justice Department said the settlement is aimed at stopping discrimination: “Emerging technologies like e-readers are changing the way we interact with the world around us and we need to ensure that people with disabilities are not excluded from the programs where these devices are used,” said Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez in a news release.
 
A DOJ official told CNSNews.com it interviewed a woman who could not participate in the library's e-reader program due to her disability and concluded that the program had violated the ADA.
 
Amy Calhoun, an Electronic Resources Librarian at the Sacramento Public Library who helped launch the ebook reader project, said she was unaware of any objections from a blind person regarding the program. “I have not heard of a specific complaint directly from a patron,” she told CNSNews.com. “But I do know that patrons who are part of the statewide Braille and talking-book program do get in touch with us for audio books.”
 
The Sacramento Public Library Authority, which operates 28 libraries, partnered with the book store chain to provide at least one NOOK e-book reader to each of its libraries, pre-loaded with roughly 20 books in all genres.
 
The library describes the program as a “pilot project,” and it requires patrons to fill out a feedback survey as the program works through its initial stages.
 
But the Justice Department says a state or local government program that excludes people with disabilities violates the ADA, regardless of whether it is a “pilot” program.
 
As part of the settlement agreement, the Justice Department directed the library system to purchase at least 18 e-readers that are accessible to the blind, something that comes in the midst of budget cuts that have forced Sacramento libraries to implement one employee furlough day each month for two years.
 
The library says it will add iPod touch and iPad devices, which read e-books aloud with a computerized voice.
 
Adding the Apple devices could cost the library anywhere from $3,582 with the purchase of 18 of the most inexpensive iPod Touch models, to $14,922 if they wish to provide the high-end version of the iPad, which cost $829 a piece.
 
According to an article posted on NFB's website, while e-books "are an especially exciting development" for blind readers, Nook's "bookstore, desktop software, mobile software, and dedicated hardware reading devices are all inaccessible to blind users."

The settlement agreement also directs the library not to buy any additional e-readers that exclude blind or disabled people; and it requires the library system to train its staff on the requirements of the ADA, the DOJ said.
 
“We are pleased that the Sacramento Public Library Authority worked so cooperatively to adopt measures that will allow patrons with disabilities to avail themselves equally of the library’s programs and services,” said U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California, Benjamin B. Wagner.
 

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/doj-targeted-public-library-lending-e-books-inaccessible-blind


Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Fucking brilliant, the Library tries to do something nice, and the DOJ has nothing better to do than fuck with them.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Thomas Perez Should Be Blocked
 American Spectator ^ | March 12, 2013 | Quin Hillyer

Posted on Tuesday, March 12, 2013 12:01:33 PM by jazusamo

Panther-case scofflaw merits no cabinet post.

If President Obama thinks he can get away with appointing an obvious prevaricator to be Secretary of Labor – and a radical, race-baiting one at that – he has lost all touch with reality. Even a group as confused and fractious as the caucus of Senate Republicans is sure to find the collective backbone to block the (expected) appointment of Thomas Perez.

As I described in detail last August, Perez is one of the most loathsome figures in the thoroughly loathsome political ranks of Obama’s Justice Department.

He has led the administration’s racial scaremongering against voter ID laws, but got smacked down hard by the U.S. District Court for the D.C. Circuit, so that elections in South Carolina this week will go ahead with the law in effect. (This wasn’t a partisan decision: The unanimous three-judge panel included Clinton appointee Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.)

Indeed, Perez doesn’t even seem to be a very good lawyer at all: His positions also have been rebuked by courts in Arkansas (about the Civil Rights for Institutionalized Persons Act), again in the D.C. District Court, in New York on an education case (U.S. v. Brennan), in a Florida abortion case where Perez’ team was abusively prosecuting peaceful protesters, and most particularly in a major Perez loss in Florida when trying to force the state not to remove non-citizens from its voter rolls.

Perez has overseen most of the unprecedentedly naked politicization of DoJ’s Civil Rights Division, as detailed in an exhaustive series of reports at PJ Media. In short, of 113 “career” (meaning supposedly apolitical) civil-service hires for the Civil Rights Division under Obama and (mostly) Perez, every one of those 113 were demonstrably liberal activists. (The New York Times effectively confirmed this report:..


(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
I thought this story had to be a joke when i first read it, so I looked into it a little more.  Nope - its more vile, disgusting, abhorent, and scum bag crap from Obama

________________________ __________________


Home > ADA > Departments of Justice and Education Warn College and University Use of Kindle and Other E-Readers May Violate ADA
Posted on June 30, 2010 by Todd Sorensen


http://www.northwesteducationlaw.com/2010/06/articles/ada/departments-of-justice-and-education-warn-college-and-university-use-of-kindle-and-other-ereaders-may-violate-ada/



Departments of Justice and Education Warn College and University Use of Kindle and Other E-Readers May Violate ADA

On June 29, 2010, the Department of Justice and Department of Education issued a joint warning letter regarding the use of “dedicated electronic readers” in colleges and universities. The term “dedicated electronic readers” encompasses a number of new handheld devices which allow students to download and read books, such as Amazon’s Kindle, Sony’s Reader Daily Edition, and Barnes & Nobles’ Nook.

The DOJ and DOE’s concern with electronic readers is that most are not accessible to students who are blind or have limited vision because they lack “an accessible text-to-speech function.” As a result, according to the DOJ and DOE, use of such devices may violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”):

Requiring use of an emerging technology in a classroom environment when the technology is inaccessible to an entire population of individuals with disabilities – individuals with visual disabilities – is discrimination prohibited by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504) unless those individuals are provided accommodations or modifications that permit them to receive all the educational benefits provided by the technology in an equally effective and equally integrated manner.

The ADA requires that places of public accommodation—which under 28 C.F.R. 36.104(10) expressly includes private educational institutions—must provide full and equal access to disabled individuals as detailed in 28 C.F.R. 36.201-204.

The warning from the DOJ and DOE comes on the heels of the DOJ’s January 2010 settlement with Case Western Reserve University, Pace University, and Reed College, resolving the DOJ’s claims against those institutions arising out of their use of Amazon’s Kindle DX. Under the terms of that settlement, the institutions agreed not to “purchase, recommend or promote” the use of electronic book readers “unless the devices are fully accessible to students who are blind and have low vision.”

Tags: ADA, Accommodation, Americans with Disabilities Act, Department of Education, department of justice, doj, electronic reader, kindle

There you go again, trying to warp, twist, and skew a very straightforward statement.

It doesn't say that college & University students are prohibited from using these devices... simply that REQUIRING THE USE OF these devices may be discriminatory and a violation of the ADA.

That's probably why Ron doesn't say that in order to post on this board, one has to be capable of comprehending what they're copy & pasting. To make that a requirement would be discriminatory to you and a few others, and would therefore be a violation of ADA.  ;)
w