Russian Skyscraper Fire vs. 9/11

[Radical Plato]

Are you really grazy? Only an true imbecile can be stupid like you are. There  is plenty of evidence that WTC 1 collapsed partly on the WTC7 and start fires in it. After burning hours, it's facade collapsed, and the back wall which is the king of the foil hat bullshit, followed. There isn't any mystic about the collapse of the WTC 7, and you see it if you look that material which is in this thread. Your believe is based on denial of the truth and facts, and that is revoltingly stupid.

I can't stop laughing, you are too much, WTC7 was a block away from the WTC Twin Towers, the majority of the debris hit the other surround WTC buildings.  Please provide this evidence of a 110 storey building hitting the WTC7.  HA HA HA, I can't help but laugh when I type that, I visualise this huge skyscraper flying through the air at high speed smashing into the WTC7. HA HA HA HA ROFL

[Radical Plato]

Are you really grazy? Only an true imbecile can be stupid like you are. There  is plenty of evidence that WTC 1 collapsed partly on the WTC7 and start fires in it. After burning hours, it's facade collapsed, and the back wall which is the king of the foil hat bullshit, followed. There isn't any mystic about the collapse of the WTC 7, and you see it if you look that material which is in this thread. Your believe is based on denial of the truth and facts, and that is revoltingly stupid.

Doesn't it bother you that Firefighters were ordered not to fight a fire that went on to burn for 8 hours and cause the collapse of a building?

[Ropo]

HA HA HA HA HA - WTC7 was not hit by a 110 story building, unless you know something the rest of the world doesn't.  Talk about dramatic.  It was hit with some debris from the WTC, it actually was one of the least hardest hit building as it was so far away,  WTC7 was the only building with a World Trade Center address that stood on a different block from the rest of the complex.  The other WTC building were damaged far worse than WTC 7.

HA HA HA, YOU IGNORANT FOOL. Look at the pictures. There is loads of pictures which proves this to be a fact, BUT YOU CAN'T FIND THEM FROM THE FOIL HAT IDOTS WEB PAGES. Why? They are severely allergic to truth..

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/ground_zero_arial2_ort.jpg = larger version

Look at the building between WTC 1 and WTC 7, and try to undestand that WTC 1 debris fell on the WTC 7. There is no buildings which is build to take that kind of beating, and it still stand and burn for hours. Here is that little fire in WTC 7:



That, regarding of the foil hat idiots truth, is practically nothing at all 

[Radical Plato]

HA HA HA, YOU IGNORANT FOOL. Look at the pictures. There is loads of pictures which proves this to be a fact, BUT YOU CAN'T FIND THEM FROM THE FOIL HAT IDOTS WEB PAGES. Why? They are severely allergic to truth..

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/ground_zero_arial2_ort.jpg = larger version

Look at the building between WTC 1 and WTC 7, and try to undestand that WTC 1 debris fell on the WTC 7. There is no buildings which is build to take that kind of beating, and it still stand and burn for hours. Here is that little fire in WTC 7:



That, regarding of the foil hat idiots truth, is practically nothing at all  

These pictures only prove that you are a mentally challenged, please provide evidence of your claim that a 110 storey building hit the WTC 7.  All the other WTC building were closer and damaged far worse, yet they remained standing.

And the pic you posted of WTC7 just shows smoke, it doesn't show fire at all (more than likely dust from the north tower collapse), please show photos showing wtc7 completely ablaze.  Here is a photo that highlight the truth about the blaze.


The public is led to believe that these small pockets of fire collapsed the building.

[Ropo]

num nums, department of transportation has cameras on their roads, where this huge plane would have flown by before it hit, also there are many cctv cameras on the outside of the pentagon itself. are you that dumb?

And there must be something to prove it, so what it is? Foil hat imbeciles claims that there is? And if those department of transportation cameras are pointed to the roads, how they are filming pentagon? In which way you are incapable to understand, that it isn't common to film military installations? Try to do it in russia, and they shot you. Try to do it in any country, and they take your camera, but in the USA, there is hundred of cameras filming their military headquarters? How it is so hard to me to believe? Because I know it isn't true.

[Radical Plato]

ROPO is melting down all over this thread.  ROPO has melted more than the steel did in the Twin Towers on 9/11

[epic_alien]

hey ropo, have you seen a video of that plane hitting the pentagon yet?

[Ropo]

I think he is talking about the hundreds of cameras installed at the pentagon.  It’s one of the largest and most secure buildings in the world. It is the nerve centre for the U.S. military. It has hundreds of security cameras both inside and outside the building. But apparently you can fly an airliner into the side of it without being caught on tape. 

I am still ROFL about your comment "WTC7 was hit by a 110 story building" HA HA HA HA

Well, maybe in your country they install all the cameras to pointing to the sky in case there will be an attack by passenger jet. In real world they are pointing at  doors etc. not empty yards, and they are working by movement recognition, which means they film only when there is movement or something to film.

[Ropo]

Doesn't it bother you that Firefighters were ordered not to fight a fire that went on to burn for 8 hours and cause the collapse of a building?

You mean those who died, or those who has just seen their friends to die, and were in the middle of that dust and shit from the collapsed towers? You seem to think that there was clean streets to drive around with the fire truck, and that tells all how much you really know about the situation, which is nothing. You are just a child who try to argue without any real knowledge at all.

[Ropo]

ROPO is melting down all over this thread.  ROPO has melted more than the steel did in the Twin Towers on 9/11

And while I am melting down, why don't you be a man and show us even one (1) evidence about the explosions? There has been 17 pages full of request that you really prove something, but you are not able to deliver. Are you really so stupid that you can't understand, that it is obvious that you can't do that? 17 pages rant without any real evidence? You must be fucking proud for yourself?  So, where exactly is the explosions, and what is that chemical compound which will explode after on hour in the fire. What is that fireproof detonation cord, which can be in fire up to one hour, and how they plant the explosives in the place where is ging to be plane crash. Few simple questions which you are unable to answer among all the foil hats of this world. Every one can understand what that means. 

[jodsy]

i heard the jews did it and they were funded by the norks who have an alliance with the illuminati

true story

[Ropo]

These pictures only prove that you are a mentally challenged, please provide evidence of your claim that a 110 storey building hit the WTC 7.  All the other WTC building were closer and damaged far worse, yet they remained standing.

Of course, if you say so: There is nothing hitting on WTC 7, just like you say. Pretty please, do you research BEFORE you make a fool out your self. 

just some smoke..

no damages what so ever..

The miraculous pieces of WTC 1 in the ruins of the WTC 7? There is parts of outer wall structure of WTC 1 clearly visible..

So, only thing you have proved in 17 pages, is that you are an idiot.

[Radical Plato]

And while I am melting down

ROFL

[Seven Copper Coins]

Ropo destroying the foil hats in this thread.

Ekul pulling so much shit out of his ass he probably gave himself hemorrhoids.  seriously, you retorts are as weak as a70 year Olds piss stream at this point

[daddy8ball]

hey ropo, have you seen a video of that plane hitting the pentagon yet?

Well, since the Pentagon is simply awash in CC cameras, then it should be a trivial exercise to provide CC screen caps of planes, from Pentagon cameras, over the Pentagon on routine flights. I mean, it's across the street from Reagan National.

epic_alien, can you provide us with pictures of planes taken from CC tvs of planes in the sky near the Pentagon? If you can't provide any, I will take that as proof that Reagan airport does not exist.

[daddy8ball]

And, what's the problem with this video again?

[buffdnet]

jet fuel is diesel fuel.  it don't won't and cannot melt steel beams.

[daddy8ball]

jet fuel is diesel fuel.  it don't won't and cannot melt steel beams.

Who said anything about melting steel beams?

NIST also emphasized the role of the fires and found that sagging floors pulled inward on the perimeter columns: "This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center

[quadzilla456]

Ropo destroying the foil hats in this thread.

Ekul pulling so much shit out of his ass he probably gave himself hemorrhoids.  seriously, you retorts are as weak as a70 year Olds piss stream at this point

Ropo is getting his ass handed to him. He claims there would have been no cameras around the Pentagon. What utter horseshit. They have confiscated numerous footage. And a secure facility like the Pentagon would actually have numerous cameras for security purposes - duh! Never mind all the gas stations around the Pentagon. Bu not one video showing a plane crashing into the building. Oh, there is one video but it shows clearly a missile or smaller object flying in to the Pentagon.

Fools!

[daddy8ball]

Ropo is getting his ass handed to him. He claims there would have been no cameras around the Pentagon. What utter horseshit. They have confiscated numerous footage. And a secure facility like the Pentagon would actually have numerous cameras for security purposes - duh! Never mind all the gas stations around the Pentagon. Bu not one video showing a plane crashing into the building. Oh, there is one video but it shows clearly a missile or smaller object flying in to the Pentagon.

Fools!

Show me a video that "clearly" shows a missile.

And, if it's such a conspiracy like you say..why wouldn't they just FAKE crystal clear footage of a plane hitting? Jeez, they're wiring buildings for controlled demos, one would think they could fake some plane footage.

[quadzilla456]

Show me a video that "clearly" shows a missile.

And, if it's such a conspiracy like you say..why wouldn't they just FAKE crystal clear footage of a plane hitting? Jeez, they're wiring buildings for controlled demos, one would think they could fake some plane footage.

Show me a video that clearly shows an airliner. If it is not an airliner then what is it?

And who knows why they did not fake an airliner in the footage. Perhaps they figured enough fools would buy it anyway - which they have, including you! The 4 frames that were released clearly shows a much smaller object flying into the Pentagon. We know the dimensions of the airliner and the Pentagon. That object is not an airliner.

[daddy8ball]

Show me a video that clearly shows an airliner. If it is not an airliner then what is it?

And who knows why they did not fake an airliner in the footage. Perhaps they figured enough fools would buy it anyway - which they have, including you! The 4 frames that were released clearly shows a much smaller object flying into the Pentagon. We know the dimensions of the airliner and the Pentagon. That object is not an airliner.

OK..if it's NOT an airliner, where is the missing airliner that supposedly crashed?

And, are all the eyewitness accounts -- that describe a plane -- wrong? In on it? What?

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.32.html

[jwb]

OK..if it's NOT an airliner, where is the missing airliner that supposedly crashed?

And, are all the eyewitness accounts -- that describe a plane -- wrong? In on it? What?

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.32.html

if you know anything about planes like this guy you can tell a boeing 757 really quickly. They have a very distinctive nose and they are long and thin.

[daddy8ball]

if you know anything about planes like this guy you can tell a boeing 757 really quickly. They have a very distinctive nose and they are long and thin.

OH, Like the eyewitness says?

TIM TIMMERMAN, EYEWITNESS: I sure am.

FRANKEN: You are a pilot. Tell us what you saw. TIMMERMAN: I was looking out the window; I live on the 16th floor, overlooking the Pentagon, in a corner apartment, so I have quite a panorama. And being next to National Airport, I hear jets all the time, but this jet engine was way too loud. I looked out to the southwest, and it came right down 395, right over Colombia Pike, and as is went by the Sheraton Hotel, the pilot added power to the engines. I heard it pull up a little bit more, and then I lost it behind a building.

And then it came out, and I saw it hit right in front of -- it didn't appear to crash into the building; most of the energy was dissipated in hitting the ground, but I saw the nose break up, I saw the wings fly forward, and then the conflagration engulfed everything in flames. It was horrible.

FRANKEN: What can you tell us about the plane itself?

TIMMERMAN: It was a Boeing 757, American Airlines, no question.

FRANKEN: You say that it was a Boeing, and you say it was a 757 or 767?

TIMMERMAN: 7-5-7.

FRANKEN: 757, which, of course...

TIMMERMAN: American Airlines.

FRANKEN: American Airlines, one of the new generation of jets.

TIMMERMAN: Right. It was so close to me it was like looking out my window and looking at a helicopter. It was just right there.

[Seven Copper Coins]

Why would they bother, they simply had to tell the people there were weapons of mass destruction and the people believed it.  Modern Governments only need to create the illusion of something, the reality doesn't matter.

OMG. you just might be the stupidest person on the planet.  So George Bush and Dick Cheney Orchestrated the most diabolical false flag strike in history, to sway public opinion and attack Iraq. And then they DO NOTHING , and let the media report that there are no WMDs (their entire premise for invading) and let history paint them as the two biggest scumbag liars of all time.

Oh and let's not leave out that  they pulled off the most eloborate controlled demo in human history...but said "fuck it" when it came to the Pentagon, and just hit it with a missile and let it get caught on camera.  Hahahaaaa