Author Topic: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare  (Read 864 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2012, 02:07:58 PM »
bump

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2012, 07:06:07 AM »
IRS Already Gearing Up for Health-Care Crackdown (more IRS intrusions on taxpayer privacy)
Fox Business News ^ | 03/30/2012 | Elizabeth MacDonald




The rest of the country may be waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court to decide the fate of President Barack Obama’s health-care law, but the Internal Revenue Service is wasting no time.

It wants to add new agents to hunt down tax cheats and still plans to spend $303.5 million building a system to oversee the effects of the health law even though its future is unclear.

As for the new IRS workers, the Government Accountability Office said the total will be about 4,500, with nearly 4,000 (3,997) slated for enforcement.

On the $303.5 million for health care, the GAO said the IRS will “continue the development of new systems and modifications of existing systems required to support new tax credits,” as well as other IRS enforcement systems for health reform.

And that’s where the health reform law gets really tricky for taxpayers.

Nina E. Olson, who runs the Taxpayer Advocate Office {TAO}, a federal IRS overseer, has warned the new health law may require more IRS intrusions on taxpayer privacy, to determine whether individuals got appropriate health coverage, and whether small businesses provide “affordable” coverage, all of which is defined by the government.

That’s because the health-reform law’s individual mandate requires almost all legal residents of the United States to have “adequate” health-care coverage, as determined by the federal government. And it requires businesses of all sizes to provide “affordable” coverage as defined by the federal government.

Health reform’s insurance mandate says if you do not have “adequate” insurance, you’ll have to pay a fine as part of your tax return. If your business doesn’t provide “affordable” coverage, you’ll have to pay a fine to the IRS, too, as part of your tax return filing.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2012, 04:14:19 AM »
White House has diverted $500M to IRS to implement healthcare law (Commiecare™ = Solyndra?)
The Hill ^ | 4/09/12 | Sam Baker
Posted on April 9, 2012 5:46:41 AM EDT by Libloather

White House has diverted $500M to IRS to implement healthcare law
By Sam Baker - 04/09/12 05:15 AM ET

The Obama administration is quietly diverting roughly $500 million to the IRS to help implement the president’s healthcare law.

The money is only part of the IRS’s total implementation spending, and it is being provided outside the normal appropriations process. The tax agency is responsible for several key provisions of the new law, including the unpopular individual mandate.

Republican lawmakers have tried to cut off funding to implement the healthcare law, at least until after the Supreme Court decides whether to strike it down. That ruling is expected by June, and oral arguments last week indicated the justices may well overturn at least the individual mandate, if not the whole law.

“While President Obama and his Senate allies continue to spend more tax dollars implementing an unpopular and unworkable law that may very well be struck down as unconstitutional in a matter of months, I’ll continue to stand with the American people who want to repeal this law and replace it with something that will actually address the cost of healthcare,” said Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.), who chairs the House appropriations subcommittee for healthcare and is in a closely contested Senate race this year.

The Obama administration has plowed ahead despite the legal and political challenges.

It has moved aggressively to get important policies in place. And, according to a review of budget documents and figures provided by congressional staff, the administration is also burning through implementation funding provided in the health law.

The law contains dozens of targeted appropriations to implement specific provisions. It also gave the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) a $1 billion implementation fund, to use as it sees fit. Republicans have called it a “slush fund.”

HHS plans to drain the entire fund by September — before the presidential election, and more than a year before most of the healthcare law takes effect. Roughly half of that money will ultimately go to the IRS.

HHS has transferred almost $200 million to the IRS over the past two years and plans to transfer more than $300 million this year, according to figures provided by a congressional aide.

The Government Accountability Office has said the transfers are perfectly legal and consistent with how agencies have used general implementation funds in the past. The $1 billion fund was set aside for “federal” implementation activities, the GAO said, and can therefore be used by any agency — not just HHS, where the money is housed.

Still, significant transfers to the IRS and other agencies leave less money for HHS, and the department needs to draw on the $1 billion fund for some of its biggest tasks.

The healthcare law directs HHS to set up a federal insurance exchange — a new marketplace for individuals and small businesses to buy coverage — in any state that doesn’t establish its own. But it didn’t provide any money for the federal exchange, forcing HHS to cobble together funding by using some of the $1 billion fund and steering money away from other accounts.

The transfers also allow the IRS to make the healthcare law a smaller part of its public budget figures. For example, the tax agency requested $8 million next year to implement the individual mandate, and said the money would not pay for any new employees.

An IRS spokeswoman would not say how much money has been spent so far implementing the individual mandate.

Republicans charged during the legislative debate over healthcare that the IRS would be hiring hundreds of new agents to enforce the mandate and throwing people in jail because they don’t have insurance.

However, the mandate is just one part of the IRS’s responsibilities.

The healthcare law includes a slew of new taxes and fees, some of which are already in effect. The tax agency wants to hire more than 300 new employees next year to cover those tax changes, such as the new fees on drug companies and insurance policies.

The IRS will also administer the most expensive piece of the new law — subsidies to help low-income people pay for insurance, which are structured as tax credits. The agency asked Congress to fund another 537 new employees dedicated to administering the new subsidies.

The Republican-led House last year passed an amendment 246-182 sponsored by Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (R-Mo.) that would have prevented the IRS from hiring new personnel or initiating any other measures to mandate people to purchase health insurance. The measure, strongly opposed by the Obama administration, was subsequently dropped from a larger bill that averted a government shutdown.

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2012, 06:00:41 AM »
new jobs being created. yeah !!! :D
w

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2012, 06:07:37 AM »
new jobs being created. yeah !!! :D

No - more like jobs destroyed!   Govt jobs are not real jobs! 


Only a piece of garbage and trash can support the idea that for ObamaCare its okt o hire thousands of new IRS agents and not one new doctor.   

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2012, 06:01:26 AM »
   Govt jobs are not real jobs!     
really?
tell that to the firemen and policemen.
w

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2012, 06:15:22 AM »
really?
tell that to the firemen and policemen.

They are a service we pay for out of private sector revenues from private sector taxpayers. 

BTW - many areas have volunteer fire depart with no measurabnle difference from unionized fire departments. 


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2013, 09:19:16 AM »
When It Comes to Health-Care Reform, the IRS Rules
 Text Size   Published: Monday, 6 May 2013 | 10:13 AM ETBy: Mark Koba
Senior Editor, CNBC

   Twitter 
 136
    LinkedIn 
 18
   Share 
 

 
Mike Kemp | Rubberball | Getty Images Get ready for the Internal Revenue Service to play a dominant role in health care. When Obamacare takes full effect next year, the agency will enforce most of the laws involved in the reform—even deciding who gets included in the health-care mandate.

"The impact of the IRS on health-care reform is huge," said Paul Hamburger, a partner and employee benefits lawyer at Proskauer.

"Other agencies like Social Security will be checking for mistakes, but the IRS is the key enforcer," Hamburger said. "It's also going to help manage who might get health care."

In its 5-4 ruling last year, the Supreme Court upheld the law's mandate that Americans have health insurance, saying that Congress can enforce the mandate under its taxing authority and through the IRS.

As a result, the agency has to administer 47 tax provisions under Obamacare. They include the right to levy a penalty against businesses and individuals who don't provide or acquire insurance. Noting that the IRS will collect the penalties, the decision labeled them a tax.

The IRS also has to determine how to distribute annual subsidies to 18 million people who make less than $45,000 a year and thus qualify for subsidies in buying health coverage, as well as how to deliver tax credits to small businesses that buy coverage for workers.

In addition, the agency will collect taxes on medical devices and a Medicare surtax on people making more than $200,000 a year, as well as conducting compliance audits of tax-exempt hospitals.
The financial burden for all this IRS enforcement is expected to total $881 million for fiscal years 2010 through 2013, according to the Treasury Department.

But former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman told Congress last year that he would need another $13.1 billion for the job in 2014. It's uncertain as to whether the funds will be forthcoming from Congress, which has cut the IRS's budget in each of the past two years.

One step the IRS has taken on health-care exchanges is drawing another round of lawsuits that accuse it of forcing more people into the system.

(Read More: California Cities Can Ban Pot Shops, Court Rules)

Each state has been offered the chance to set up its own health-care exchange to allow residents to buy insurance at lower cost and with some financial assistance. If states choose not to set up an exchange, the federal government will run them.

Twenty-six states have said they will not set up their own exchange; seven others have opted to help organize them but not fund them. Because the exchanges are federally funded, residents in those 33 states would not be eligible for federal subsidies. But the IRS stated last year that they would be eligible for health-care premium subsidies.

Individual and small business owners coordinated by the Competitive Enterprise Institute filed suit against the decision in federal court in Washington last week. It contends that the ruling would force more businesses and people (who would probably be exempt from the mandate without the subsidies) into buying health insurance and subsequent penalties if they failed to purchase it.

The agency has not responded to the lawsuit.

"The IRS has a lot on its hands when it comes to Obamacare," Hamburger said. "There will be some rough spots ahead. There really hasn't been anything like this in decades in terms of sweeping reform legislation."

(Read More: Bashful? Pfizer Takes Viagra Online to Perk Up Sales)

It's not clear if the IRS is to blame for one rough spot that has been encountered.

Saying that it can't meet the 2014 deadline, the Obama administration is delaying parts of the program intended to provide affordable coverage to small businesses and their workers. Instead of a marketplace with choices in the 33 states with federally run exchanges, small businesses will be limited to a more costly single plan until 2015.

What the IRS can actually enforce also seems a difficult question.

The law severely limits the agency's ability to collect penalties. It can ask for the money, but there are no civil or criminal penalties for refusing to pay it. The IRS cannot seize bank accounts or dock wages to collect it. No interest accumulates for unpaid penalties.The law allows the IRS to withhold tax refunds to collect the penalty but only if someone overpaid taxes.

And the IRS is still working on procedures for taxpayers to prove they have insurance.


Some of Obamcare is in effect. Parents can keep their children on their health insurance plans until age 26. The 2.3 percent tax on those making more than $200,000 to help pay for Medicare expansion is also on the books.

Upcoming provisions include that insurers cannot refuse coverage for preexisting illnesses, as well the individual and business mandates.

An estimated 27 million people will be eligible for health care by 2017, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That kind of number is going to put the IRS on the firing line, Hamburger said.

(Read More: President Vows Obamacare Will Meet Deadline)

"They are preparing for it, but it's going to be tough to say the least," Hamburger said. "To know for sure if the IRS will be ready to handle in 2014 is hard to guess. But health-care reform is not going away, so they better be as ready as possible

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama seeks 4,000 new IRS Agents to enforce ObamaCare
« Reply #9 on: May 11, 2013, 03:01:58 AM »
IRS Blames 'Low-Level' Employees for Targeting Conservative Groups
Breitbart ^ | 5/13/13 | Tony Lee
Posted on May 10, 2013 9:06:34 PM EDT by Nachum

On Friday, the IRS blamed "low-level" employees in its Cincinnati office for targeting tax-exempt organizations that had "Tea Party" or "Patriots" in their names during the 2012 election and apologized for their actions.

Upon a review of the IRS bureaucracy, though, the Cincinnati office is not a random backwater outpost for "low-level" IRS rogues. In fact, the Cincinnati office is where determinations on tax-exempt organizations' eligibility are made and is the only physical office in the complex IRS bureaucracy dedicated to tax-exempt determinations.

On the IRS's website, in the "How to Contact the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division" section, the Cincinnati office is the only one listed for people to contact if they have questions about "Charities & Non-Profits":

To obtain a determination letter that applies the principles and precedents previously announced to a specific set of facts, or to transmit copies of amended documents write or fax to:

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...