LOL its not vigilantism if they are hired to protect individuals....
so you think a person who owns a gun for protection is a vigilante?
so vigilantes can't be paid ?
I'm done playing semantic games with you
there are many other examples of the same concept as espoused by LaPierre
you can choose to believe whatever you'd like
Aside from this particular part of the letter you should look at his point as I think it's the most salient point in the document and one which I've said before and (obviously) agree with 100%
I think it's time you dropped this nonsense about protecting our "rights." Be honest and tell it like it is. The reason you're opposed to background checks has absolutely nothing to do with the Second Amendment. It's about making it as easy as possible for everyone to own a gun. More guns means more profits for the gun companies, and that's who you really represent.