Angelina Jolie has breasts REMOVED

[deadpan]

To be fair, *those* fabulous boobs were removed by starvation a long time ago, in Angelina's quest to get back to her birth weight. Indeed that entire, smoking hot Angelina was removed. DAMN YOU ANOREXIA! DAMN YOU.

are you guys being serious? those saggy, misshapen, uneven boobs are fucking terrible. i've seen overweight fat chicks with better boobs than that.

[Danny-Boy]

are you guys being serious? those saggy, misshapen, uneven boobs are fucking terrible. i've seen overweight fat chicks with better boobs than that.

"Pre-Anorexic Angelina boobs terrible?!?"  wow.... man u guys are high rollers.. coz they looked mighty amazing to me... natural flow of breasts just have that sexier appeal to me as opposed to twin-sized bowling balls of steel cannons w/ random chest muscle striations n between.... 

[Army of One]

"Pre-Anorexic Angelina boobs terrible?!?"  wow.... man u guys are high rollers.. coz they looked mighty amazing to me... natural flow of breasts just have that sexier appeal to me as opposed to twin-sized bowling balls of steel cannons w/ random chest muscle striations n between.... 

Remind me not to send my girlfriend to you for a breast cancer exam

[Danny-Boy]

 

Remind me not to send my girlfriend to you for a breast cancer exam

I just can't fathom how people are calling them "terrible?"

[_bruce_]

Good, the filthy whore doesn't need them anyways - socialism enables her to see other sets of tits as her own.

[Mrdibbs]

are you guys being serious? those saggy, misshapen, uneven boobs are fucking terrible. i've seen overweight fat chicks with better boobs than that.

Agree,

Every second chick in the ''college girls'' thread top Angie easy.

Would still hit regardless, great facial features.

[booty]

ok, i just read she wants to have her female testicles removed too, sorry i dont know the english term for that.

oh brother, its not like she wanted to get overweight and have own kids in the first place.

I think getting her ovaries removed is a big mistake. 

[jon cole]

angelina jolie has carrier relaunched.

(just by removing her dignity)

[Darren Avey]

i wonder what kind of fcked up shit angelina jolie thinks about when masturbating? 

She thinks about me and the things she wants me to do to her

[Tito24]

  Is she even 100 pounds?

she looks scary there

[Psychopath]

  Is she even 100 pounds?

[jon cole]

haha, jon cole, i cant remember to ever disagree with your views, i think youre a very smart guy

her acting skill was removed 20 years ago.

[ukjeff]

I always thought she looked like a crack addict.

[jon cole]

she never had any.
r
the movie where she helps the card trickster is fucking shit too, like everything she starred.

any holywood bimbo whore out there could do as "good" or better.

her negro-like lips made her famous because some wankers who never get women would over fantasize over blwjobs when they see her mouth.

Yep, tomb raider is a film based around her lips
She's sad/happy/perplex/angry her face looks the same.
Being jon voight's daughter is her main talent.

[mik1111]

I think getting her ovaries removed is a big mistake. 

you need to stop thinking and start knowing.
many oncologists recommend that women past a certain age, such as yourself, remove the ovaries.

If you're not having more children the ovaries have no function other than cancer receptacles.

[biff]

 

I just can't fathom how people are calling them "terrible?"

out of curiosity, if you had the gene for testicular cancer, would you have your nuts cut off? (assuming you're male)

[Roger Bacon]

EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents, influence Supreme Court decision (opinion)

(NaturalNews) Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, "heroic choice" that has been portrayed in the mainstream media. Natural News has learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040365_Angelina_Jolie_gene_patents_Supreme_Court_decision.html#ixzz2TVzIh4bv

[Disgusted]

EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents, influence Supreme Court decision (opinion)

(NaturalNews) Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, "heroic choice" that has been portrayed in the mainstream media. Natural News has learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040365_Angelina_Jolie_gene_patents_Supreme_Court_decision.html#ixzz2TVzIh4bv

Gee what a surprise. People really are like sheep.

[Teutonic Knight]

What about her balls?

& fish lips 

[Teutonic Knight]

You've missed the mark here completely.

Her and Pitt give a shit ton of money to charities and spend tons of time helping people.

............none of those celebrities do volunteering work in nursing homes  , allways kids only 

[nzmusclemonster]

How are we going with the pussy shots?

[Grape Ape]

............none of those celebrities do volunteering work in nursing homes  , allways kids only 

So?

[_bruce_]

EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents, influence Supreme Court decision (opinion)

(NaturalNews) Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, "heroic choice" that has been portrayed in the mainstream media. Natural News has learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040365_Angelina_Jolie_gene_patents_Supreme_Court_decision.html#ixzz2TVzIh4bv

What a surprise.

[SquatsRule]

I understand she removed them, but I was expecting more pictures of her breasts in this thread. Four pages of scrolling and only one picture. 

[240 is Back]

Would you have sex with Jon Voight for one minute (60 seconds) if it meant you could bang Angelia Jolie for 24 hours straight?


Be honest, getbiggers.