Author Topic: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?  (Read 596 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59656
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2013, 02:39:59 PM »
Mmm, now where do you supposed Syria got those?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2013, 02:50:18 PM »
They got them in 2007.  Well, Israel started bombing their WMD facilities in 2007.  They had a few accidents in 2007.  Probably 2-3 years before that is when they started building them.

So it's been a few years.

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5605
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2013, 04:31:56 PM »
Mmm, now where do you supposed Syria got those?

Why from Kenyan intelligence of course. Amirite?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2013, 05:39:11 PM »
The Obama administration is considering resettling thousands of refugees who left Syria during the country's ongoing civil war to multiple towns and cities across the United States, the L.A. Times reports.


A resettlement plan under discussion in Washington and other capitals is aimed at relieving pressure on Middle Eastern countries straining to support 1.6 million refugees, as well as assisting hard-hit Syrian families.

The State Department is "ready to consider the idea," an official from the department said, if the administration receives a formal request from the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees, which is the usual procedure.

The United States usually accepts about half the refugees that the U.N. agency proposes for resettlement. California has historically taken the largest share, but Illinois, Florida, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia are also popular destinations.

U.N. refugee officials, along with diplomats and non-governmental relief groups, are scheduled to meet in Geneva this week to discuss potential resettlement plans. Germany has already agreed to take 5,000 refugees.

"It was probably inevitable that in this crisis, with these overwhelming numbers, governments would start moving in this direction," Lavinia Limon, chief executive officer of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, a Virginia-based advocacy and service group, told the L.A. Times. Limon added, "But there will be resistance."

Congress is unlikely to warm up to the idea of agreeing to resettle thousands of Syrian refugees into the U.S. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle who are currently pushing immigration reform bills, particularly aimed at Latinos who are in the country illegally, will need to explain why they may favor or oppose resettling thousands of Syrian refugees.

It should be noted that Congress resisted accepting Iraqi refugees in 2003 following the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Between 1983 and 2009, the U.S. resettled a total of 76,205 Iraqis. Meanwhile, seventy percent of total refugees in the U.S. were on food stamps in 2009. Within that number, 95 percent of Iraqi refugees were food stamp recipients. Additionally, the report shows an unemployment rate of 46 percent in 2009 among Iraqi refugees. A total of 219 Syrian refugees were resettled in the U.S. between 1983 and 2009.

More importantly, President Obama's administration supports Syrians who are attempting to oust Syrian President Bashar Assad, but the emergence of Islamic extremist groups with ties to al Qaeda among the Syrian opposition presents a serious security concern. The L.A. Times alludes to the potential danger with such a resettlement:


Homeland security officials require careful vetting of refugees, with multiple interviews and background checks before they are allowed to enter the country. Under normal circumstances, the screening process can take a year or longer.

U.S. officials are likely to be extra careful with Syrian refugees. As Islamic militants take a more prominent role in the rebel forces, officials worry about fighters with Al Qaeda ties trying to enter the country. Two resettled Iraqis were convicted of trying to send arms to Al Qaeda from their home in Bowling Green, Ky.

New National Security Advisor Susan Rice and President Obama's nominee for U.N. ambassador Samantha Power are both refugee advocates and will likely push for the resettlement.


George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • TND
Re: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2013, 04:37:54 AM »
Why from Kenyan intelligence of course. Amirite?


That is an oxymoron.

Did you mean Keynesian?

Oh wait.


dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2013, 05:51:04 AM »
They got them in 2007.  Well, Israel started bombing their WMD facilities in 2007.  They had a few accidents in 2007.  Probably 2-3 years before that is when they started building them.

So it's been a few years.

And it went unchecked from 2008 until now? Wow, Obama is utterly clueless. What is he good for? Never seen a more useless leader in my lifetime.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2013, 05:52:19 AM »
 ;D


Bad Boy Dazza

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3372

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5605
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: Has Obama found his "Wag the Dog" moment to deflect his scandals?
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2013, 06:28:18 AM »
That is what it is.  He will start a war to save himself.

Save himself from what exactly?

He's already won the election and cannot run for the Presidency again. He's cannot lose the office he currently holds save for an impeachment, but that's unlikely to happen given the "map" in Washington, especially in the Senate.

The only thing he has to worry about is history - how he will be perceived after his tenure ends. But that's a book that almost always is more about who can spin better than who achieved more. And so, something tells me Obama will be just fine.