Author Topic: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)  (Read 11390 times)

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #25 on: July 07, 2013, 08:28:14 AM »

would never fly American made plane.

Difference between Euro and American product, be it cars or planes is like night and day.
American is like Chinese; looks shiny but breakes up when you would need it  ;D
i fly a lot and I can't tell the difference between a Boeing and an Airbus in terms of quality.

I'm sure you can look it up but I would say that almost all airlines and manufacturers have a about the same history of safety.

They are all very very high.

There are literally millions of flights a year and you have maybe 1 or 2 incidents of anything going wrong.

That's better than any other form of transportation. Period.

The_Punisher

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
  • The Unrighteous Shall Pay
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #26 on: July 07, 2013, 10:40:41 AM »
i fly a lot and I can't tell the difference between a Boeing and an Airbus in terms of quality.

I'm sure you can look it up but I would say that almost all airlines and manufacturers have a about the same history of safety.

They are all very very high.

There are literally millions of flights a year and you have maybe 1 or 2 incidents of anything going wrong.

That's better than any other form of transportation. Period.


American airlines used lots of airbus planes and boeing as well...the new american airlines fleet are now using the new boeing 777 and I heard there will be a couple 737 as well....jetblue uses airbus exclusively while southwest uses Boeing 737 exclusively....maybe airbus give great discounts....lol....as far as safety records, I think both airbus and boeing had their moments....mcdonald douglas planes were some of the shittiest products.....here's the safety records for the DC-9

As of March 2009, the DC-9 has been involved in 117 incidents, including 101 hull-loss accidents,[31] with 2,135 fatalities


and here's another safety records for the MD-80

As of February 2013, the MD-80 series has been involved in 61 incidents,[31] including 31 hull-loss accidents,[32] with 1,330 fatalities of occupants

The_Punisher

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
  • The Unrighteous Shall Pay
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #27 on: July 07, 2013, 10:56:17 AM »
flying may still be the safest mode of transportation, but when disater strikes, it goes out with a Bang....here's a crash records from 1999 up to last year

year   deaths       # of accidents
2012  794                  119
2011  828                  117
2010  1,115                130
2009  1,103                122
2008  884                   156
2007  971                   147
2006  1,294                166
2005  1,459                185
2004   71                   172
2003   1,230               199
2002   1,413               185
2001   4,140               200
2000   1,582               189
1999   1,138               211

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21151
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2013, 11:07:12 AM »
flying may still be the safest mode of transportation, but when disater strikes, it goes out with a Bang....here's a crash records from 1999 up to last year

year   deaths       # of accidents
2012  794                  119
2011  828                  117
2010  1,115                130
2009  1,103                122
2008  884                   156
2007  971                   147
2006  1,294                166
2005  1,459                185
2004   71                   172
2003   1,230               199
2002   1,413               185
2001   4,140               200
2000   1,582               189
1999   1,138               211


2004 was a good year to fly. I hate flying and should've never clicked this thread.

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #29 on: July 07, 2013, 11:15:43 AM »
flying may still be the safest mode of transportation, but when disater strikes, it goes out with a Bang....here's a crash records from 1999 up to last year

year   deaths       # of accidents
2012  794                  119
2011  828                  117
2010  1,115                130
2009  1,103                122
2008  884                   156
2007  971                   147
2006  1,294                166
2005  1,459                185
2004   71                   172
2003   1,230               199
2002   1,413               185
2001   4,140               200
2000   1,582               189
1999   1,138               211


No disagreement, but there are literally 50,000 flights per day.

That's 1.5 million flights a month. What's that? About .00013%?

Way more accidents in every other transportation method.

No doubt, if it hits the fan, odds are, you're done.

The_Punisher

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
  • The Unrighteous Shall Pay
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #30 on: July 07, 2013, 12:09:01 PM »
No disagreement, but there are literally 50,000 flights per day.

That's 1.5 million flights a month. What's that? About .00013%?

Way more accidents in every other transportation method.

No doubt, if it hits the fan, odds are, you're done.

lol...that's the catch....it maybe safer than other means of transportation, but when shit happens, everyone pays

The_Punisher

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
  • The Unrighteous Shall Pay
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #31 on: July 07, 2013, 12:10:19 PM »
2004 was a good year to fly. I hate flying and should've never clicked this thread.


I don't mind flying, but I hate turbulences.....it always make me feels like that shit is gonna flip and take a nose dive..  :'(

TommyBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • What's the vector, Victor?
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #32 on: July 07, 2013, 12:20:42 PM »
flying may still be the safest mode of transportation, but when disater strikes, it goes out with a Bang....here's a crash records from 1999 up to last year

year   deaths       # of accidents
2012  794                  119
2011  828                  117
2010  1,115                130
2009  1,103                122
2008  884                   156
2007  971                   147
2006  1,294                166
2005  1,459                185
2004   71                   172
2003   1,230               199
2002   1,413               185
2001   4,140               200
2000   1,582               189
1999   1,138               211


Something that needs to be put in perspective here are the sheer total amount of flights per year compared to the number of fatal incidents. Not to mention many of these incidents are VFR pilots being absolutely retarded. I deal with thousands of flights per day and we have an incident only 2-3 times a year. That is only my facility, not including the rest of the U.S. (or world). It is almost ALWAYS a general aviation pilot being a knuckle head, or some poor guy who got rocked on his landing with a bad gust or crosswind that increases these numbers.

I myself would never train to be a pilot after being in m career field for as long as I have been, but it is hard to not recognize the statistics. The sheer amount of redundancy layered over redundancy in the interest of safety is pretty mind boggling when it comes to flying.

Think of it like this. How often do you think there would be traffic accidents if all cars were literally forced to stay 1/4 mile behind each other at all times, and that there was a physical person at each stop light/intersection dictating when and which cars could proceed? That's a simplified explanation of how flying works (unless you go VFR and basically say I GOT THIS!).

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #33 on: July 07, 2013, 04:35:53 PM »

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #34 on: July 07, 2013, 04:37:20 PM »

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #35 on: July 07, 2013, 04:39:38 PM »

Chadwick The Beta

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4319
  • "Stop calling me by my name."
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #36 on: July 07, 2013, 04:40:18 PM »
obviously a punishment from God for them even considering renaming the SF Airport "Harvey Milk Airport"

K

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #37 on: July 07, 2013, 04:40:43 PM »

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #38 on: July 07, 2013, 05:39:36 PM »
Video of crash

TommyBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • What's the vector, Victor?
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #39 on: July 07, 2013, 06:29:44 PM »
The NTSB initial findings are showing evidence of serious pilot error so far.

Video of crash
[ Invalid YouTube link ]

Got you bro!

Also, hello fellow jalopnik reader.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #40 on: July 07, 2013, 06:44:40 PM »
The NTSB initial findings are showing evidence of serious pilot error so far.

Got you bro!

Also, hello fellow jalopnik reader.
Thanks...and yep...

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #41 on: July 07, 2013, 07:17:01 PM »
Asiana Flight 214 pilot had 43 hours of training.


Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #42 on: July 08, 2013, 12:54:25 AM »
Boeing is going to want everything in the investigation point to pilot error.

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #43 on: July 08, 2013, 04:33:27 AM »
They said it looks like one girl died because the emergency truck ran over her.

The_Punisher

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
  • The Unrighteous Shall Pay
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #44 on: July 08, 2013, 05:07:43 AM »
Something that needs to be put in perspective here are the sheer total amount of flights per year compared to the number of fatal incidents. Not to mention many of these incidents are VFR pilots being absolutely retarded. I deal with thousands of flights per day and we have an incident only 2-3 times a year. That is only my facility, not including the rest of the U.S. (or world). It is almost ALWAYS a general aviation pilot being a knuckle head, or some poor guy who got rocked on his landing with a bad gust or crosswind that increases these numbers.

I myself would never train to be a pilot after being in m career field for as long as I have been, but it is hard to not recognize the statistics. The sheer amount of redundancy layered over redundancy in the interest of safety is pretty mind boggling when it comes to flying.

Think of it like this. How often do you think there would be traffic accidents if all cars were literally forced to stay 1/4 mile behind each other at all times, and that there was a physical person at each stop light/intersection dictating when and which cars could proceed? That's a simplified explanation of how flying works (unless you go VFR and basically say I GOT THIS!).


well, it seems like the reports are starting to come out a bit now about this Crash and Pilot Error is a front runner.......they said this pilot had very little training on this Boeing 777 prior to this flight and the flight data recorder showed that at 5 miles till landing, the plane was going too fast and was at a high altitude and the pilot was not taking final approach procedures and by the time he had the plane ready to land, they were going too slow, too low and had very little time to recover and then Boom!!,........WOW, a pilot with little experience on this model Plane was trusted to fly 309 souls on a 12hr flight.....that wasn't smart

The_Punisher

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
  • The Unrighteous Shall Pay
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #45 on: July 08, 2013, 05:11:43 AM »
Asiana Flight 214 pilot had 43 hours of training.





hahahahahha.....Oh my freaking goodness......this airline should be severely punished......I bet you those 43hrs of training were on a Simulator....that punk ass pilot never flew the 777 before and he was trusted with the lives of 309 people.....only in South Korea you'll see bullshit like this.. ;)

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15665
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #46 on: July 08, 2013, 05:17:41 AM »

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29102
  • Hold Fast
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #47 on: July 08, 2013, 06:32:04 AM »
Inauspicious  :(

TommyBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • What's the vector, Victor?
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #48 on: July 08, 2013, 08:02:41 AM »
After watching that crash I'm pretty amazed only two people died. Obviously it's a tragedy, but holy crap that could have been so much worse.

Tre

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16549
  • "What you don't have is a career."
Re: First-ever fatal crash of Boeing 777 today (SFO)
« Reply #49 on: July 08, 2013, 10:41:11 AM »
After watching that crash I'm pretty amazed only two people died. Obviously it's a tragedy, but holy crap that could have been so much worse.

The 777 is an amazing aircraft.  Hail to the almighty GOD for giving mankind the ability to use our fucking brains to create such wondrous works of engineering and design, despite our total inability to control the fucking weather.

And yes, the NTSB chick is hot as hell.  Would do.  Would definitely do.  Hell, even though she works for the guh-ment, I'd wife that shit.