http://www.businessinsider.com/frustrated-with-the-new-health-care-exchange-2013-10Its a complete disaster
The website is made to handle only 30,000 people at one time...when you have over 4 million people online, it gets a bit wonky....in any event, the bugs will be fixed
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-07/republicans-didn-t-sabotage-health-exchanges-obama-did.htmlLMFAOAnd still the cultists support this asswipe
Unfounded claim after unfounded claim. He makes up his own "leftist" theories and debunks them.Good work buddy
Question. If the ACA turns out to be a failure will the left admit it?
America will have a rough time if it does, however, we can use our brains to decipher the relative risk. Was Romney care successful? what about other universal health care models in other countries?I don't think it's the best option, but I think both sides kind of debated it down and thus it's a compromise which is a concession in the end for the US people.
On the flip side, will the right admit they were wrong if it's a success?
Wrong. It wasn't a compromise. It was passed along party lines.
The right would still be correct and won't have to admit they were wrong.Why?The only way for that law to become a success is to amend it considerably. The more changes made to it, the less it resembles Obamacare. So the success will be on a reform that is unlike obamacrapcare.As it was ORIGINALLY constituted it was only going to be a disaster.
Oh, it hasn't been altered in any fashion?I also wasn't implying what you think I was.
Doesn't matter if it was amended before being passed. The fact is it was a partisan bill. Not a single Republican vote in the Senate. Passed 220-215 in the House. So to say "both sides kind of debated it down and thus it's a compromise" is inaccurate.On top of that, it has been very unpopular. Polls have consistently shown that Americans don't want it.