Author Topic: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House  (Read 2736 times)

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #25 on: October 22, 2013, 12:30:30 PM »
nonsense

you idiots were buying  up guns and ammo from the day Obama was first elected and he hadn't said a damn thing about guns

You guys just spooked yourselves and then starting hoarding

My next door neighbor is a retired navy seal and he was doing the same thing and telling me how Obama was going to go after guns

I had to remind him (at that time) that Obama hadn't said a damn thing about guns

Actually there was buying surge around when he was elected because those who were knowledgeable, including the NRA, knew that Obama was going to come after them.
At the time I was like you, and I laughed at all those people and called them paranoid. There was no ammo shortage of any kind from mid 2009 all the way until 2013.
Fast forward 4 years and Obama did EXACTLY what all these people said he would do. Your neighbor and all those people were right all along..who is the idiot? The idiots are people like you, who continue to eat up whatever shit this scam artist president throws at you, and then have the audacity to disparage those who did and do know better.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #26 on: October 22, 2013, 12:37:24 PM »
Actually there was buying surge around when he was elected because those who were knowledgeable, including the NRA, knew that Obama was going to come after them.
At the time I was like you, and I laughed at all those people and called them paranoid. There was no ammo shortage of any kind from mid 2009 all the way until 2013.
Fast forward 4 years and Obama did EXACTLY what all these people said he would do. Your neighbor and all those people were right all along..who is the idiot? The idiots are people like you, who continue to eat up whatever shit this scam artist president throws at you, and then have the audacity to disparage those who did and do know better.

yet he didn't even mention guns in his first time so that proved to be paranoid delusion


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #27 on: October 22, 2013, 12:38:40 PM »
Skell


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Jump to: navigation, search


Skell, as a stereotypical or archetypal designation, refers to a person who is homeless, vagrant or derelict. It is often used to connote such a person who is habitually engaged in small-time criminal activity, especially by one working as a con artist or panhandler.



Contents
  [hide] 1 History
2 Origin
3 Use in film and television
4 External links

History[edit]

In its modern form, the use of skell as a slang term in the United States appears to date only from the 1970s, most especially from New York City. The word has sometimes been used by the police officer characters on the TV shows NYPD Blue, Third Watch, and Law and Order: SVU.

Origin[edit]

Possible origins for the word include:
The 17th century British slang word skelder, a noun and verb which referred to a professional beggar, especially one who falsely pretended to be a wounded former soldier to gain sympathy; more generally, it could be used for a swindler or cheat. An early recorded use is by Ben Jonson, from his play Poetaster, written in 1601: 'An honest decayed commander, cannot skelder, cheat, nor be seene in a bawdie house.' In an older military connection, the term skelder seems to have been used in early Medieval England to mean 'shield-maker' (Old Norse 'skjoldur'?), the supposed derivation of the streetname Skeldergate in the city of York.
The Dutch schelm, a word meaning a villain or rogue.
The Latin scelus, meaning a wicked deed or wickedness.
An abbreviation of skeleton.

Use in film and television[edit]

The term is used several times in the film Miller's Crossing, especially in regard to the character Bernie Bernbaum.

Crow T. Robot refers to Michael J. Nelson as a skell in a sketch performed in episode 905 of Mystery Science Theater 3000.

Ed Burns (Mickey) refers to Mike McGlone (Francis) as a skell in the movie She's the One.

Joe Pesci (Nicky Santoro) uses the term skell in his rant to Robert De Niro (Sam Rothstein) in the movie Casino.

Police Officer Smitty refers to Bender as a skell when he and his partner, URL, are undercover in Little Bitaly in the second-season episode of Futurama entitled Bender Gets Made.

Within the Law & Order television series, the term has been casually used by leading characters such as Det. Lennie Briscoe, Det. Elliot Stabler and Det. Mike Logan.

In the Third Watch television series, the term has been frequently used in casual conversation between the leading NYPD characters such as John 'Sully' Sullivan, Maurice 'Bosco' Boscorelli and others.

External links[edit]

sounds more like you than anyone else

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39865
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #28 on: October 22, 2013, 12:38:58 PM »
yet he didn't even mention guns in his first time so that proved to be paranoid delusion



BULLSHIT - he called us bitter clingers, etc.

That ghetto welfare drug addicted skell made his own bed - now let him sleep in it

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #29 on: October 22, 2013, 12:52:21 PM »
BULLSHIT - he called us bitter clingers, etc.

That ghetto welfare drug addicted skell made his own bed - now let him sleep in it

yeah well you're certainly not a bitter clinger are you

what he should have said is
" there are some people who are just fucking insane and racist and they can't deal with the fact that a majority of their fellow citizens voted for a black candidate as POTUS
It's literally destroyed what was left of their already fragile and diseased minds"

that would have been more appropriate for you

Here's the full "bitter clinger" quote and of course that's all it took to set off the gun nuts on a hoarding binge basically fulfilling Obama's claim about bitter clingers

shit, this statement probably applies to many of the posters on this board

Quote
"You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them," Obama said. "And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #30 on: October 22, 2013, 01:06:22 PM »
BULLSHIT - he called us bitter clingers, etc.


How soon do they forget?

Of course, the obama lover will post that the community organizer never stated that he would ban or confiscate guns when he made that comment.

As if we have to hear those words come out of his mouth to discern his true intentions.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #31 on: October 22, 2013, 01:10:20 PM »
How soon do they forget?

Of course, the obama lover will post that the community organizer never stated that he would ban or confiscate guns when he made that comment.

As if we have to hear those words come out of his mouth to discern his true intentions.


correct

not only did he not say at that time that he would ban or confiscate guns but he rarely if ever mentioned guns during his first term

just having a black guy as POTUS was enough to scare the piss out of you retards

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #32 on: October 22, 2013, 01:28:07 PM »
correct

not only did he not say at that time that he would ban or confiscate guns but he rarely if ever mentioned guns during his first term

just having a black guy as POTUS was enough to scare the piss out of you retards

Maybe, just maybe, these people read up on him a bit prior to him being elected?

If you had done that too instead of getting all your political knowledge from watching MSNBC then you would know he was already against gun ownership prior to him being elected. Good lord you are that dumb?

And he has already PROVEN their fears correct! And you are STILL saying THEY are the morons?

But no, obviously, his election motivated people(of all races) to buy bullets 'because he is black'. Makes a lot more sense ::)

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #33 on: October 22, 2013, 02:04:13 PM »
Maybe, just maybe, these people read up on him a bit prior to him being elected?

If you had done that too instead of getting all your political knowledge from watching MSNBC then you would know he was already against gun ownership prior to him being elected. Good lord you are that dumb?

And he has already PROVEN their fears correct! And you are STILL saying THEY are the morons?

But no, obviously, his election motivated people(of all races) to buy bullets 'because he is black'. Makes a lot more sense ::)

fine, tell me what you think they read

It doesn't change the fact that he didn't say a damn this about guns his entire first time (being the informed person that you are I'm sure you remember how he was criticized for that by his own party at the time)

and, as I mentioned already.... there fears were not correct

btw - there was and is still no shortage of hatred of Obama simply due to his race

To deny that is to simply deny reality

You can see examples of it here every day

Still not a single person on this board who can articulate a valid reason for impeachment

All they can seem to do is fantasize about it

and the brilliant reply

Obama is a twink and is black.   How about that?   :D

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #34 on: October 22, 2013, 02:09:48 PM »
I didn't know living at 1600 Penn. qualified one as homeless.

If that is the case, then what does living in a shit filled ghetto with "thugs" all around say about a person?  Other than they are a poor bitter bitch?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39865
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #35 on: October 22, 2013, 02:12:09 PM »
I didn't know living at 1600 Penn. qualified one as homeless.

If that is the case, then what does living in a shit filled ghetto with "thugs" all around say about a person?  Other than they are a poor bitter bitch?

Obama is just a GRIFTER passing through trasdhing and shitting all over everything as he pleases

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #36 on: October 22, 2013, 05:04:09 PM »
Obama is just a GRIFTER passing through trasdhing and shitting all over everything as he pleases

Yet unlike you he lives in a nice place, not the ghetto and has a wife, not an imaginary girlfriend.

I highly doubt Obama collects random photos of men on the internet and loves to use the word "twink".

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #37 on: October 22, 2013, 05:20:34 PM »
Another classic of an article relying on a headline that stands out to get a lot of clicks but once opened provides zero substance whatsoever.

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #38 on: October 23, 2013, 08:01:54 AM »
fine, tell me what you think they read

It doesn't change the fact that he didn't say a damn this about guns his entire first time (being the informed person that you are I'm sure you remember how he was criticized for that by his own party at the time)

and, as I mentioned already.... there fears were not correct

btw - there was and is still no shortage of hatred of Obama simply due to his race

To deny that is to simply deny reality

You can see examples of it here every day

and the brilliant reply


The more you post on this subject the more you are owing yourself. Read my post again and try again to actually refute something this time :D

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63969
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #39 on: November 13, 2013, 10:27:52 AM »
What a difference a few weeks and a bunch of lying makes. 

Republicans mount shock comeback, erase Democrats’ edge in eyes of Americans
By David Sherfinski
The Washington Times Wednesday, November 13, 2013

In just six weeks, Republicans have completely erased a 9-point deficit in a generic congressional ballot question and are now running even with Democrats.

Thirty-nine percent of registered voters say they would vote for a Democrat in their district — and the same percentage say they would vote for a Republican — if elections for the U.S. House of Representatives were held today, according to numbers from a Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday.

Last month, Democrats had held a nine-point advantage on the same question, 43 percent to 34 percent.

Independent voters favored Democrats in October, 32 percent to 30 percent, but now favor Republicans by a 37 percent to 26 percent margin.

That’s not to say voters are wildly impressed with either party; 20 percent approve of the way congressional Republicans are handling their jobs, compared with 73 percent who disapprove. Interestingly, 30 percent approve of how Democrats in Congress are handling their jobs, compared to 62 percent who disapprove.

A similar split is evident in voters’ opinion of both major political parties. Thirty-eight percent have a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party, compared to 48 percent who have an unfavorable opinion. Meanwhile, 31 percent have a favorable opinion of the Republican Party, with 54 percent holding an unfavorable opinion of the GOP.

A majority of voters don’t like how top congressional leaders are handling their jobs: 58 disapprove of House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, 55 percent disapprove of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, and 52 percent disapprove of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat.

A plurality of voters — 46 percent to 27 percent — disapprove of how Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, is handling his job.

“In Washington today, it comes down to who the voters dislike the least,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. “There are no heroes.”

The poll of 2,545 registered voters was conducted from Nov. 6-11 and has a margin of error of 1.9 percentage points.

Thirty-two percent of respondents self-identified as Democrats, 26 percent said they were Republicans, and 35 percent said they were independents.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/13/gop-erases-9-point-deficit-generic-congressional-b/#ixzz2kYFkmqIF

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #40 on: November 13, 2013, 11:48:10 AM »
Maybe, just maybe, these people read up on him a bit prior to him being elected?

If you had done that too instead of getting all your political knowledge from watching MSNBC then you would know he was already against gun ownership prior to him being elected. Good lord you are that dumb?

And he has already PROVEN their fears correct! And you are STILL saying THEY are the morons?

But no, obviously, his election motivated people(of all races) to buy bullets 'because he is black'. Makes a lot more sense ::)

Or maybe, just maybe, the folks that would have something to gain if Obama was anti-gun promoted this idea for selfish reasons?
Hmmm.  Who would stand to gain?
-- Repubs would pick up votes of gun enthusiasts
-- NRA would gain members of folks that want some real protection of their gun ownership righs
-- Gun and ammo manufacturers profit financially

Please, if you have links that show Obama supported anti-gun policies before he was elected president, I'd be happy to read 'em.

And, c'mon, can't you acknowledge that the reason why the anti-gun sentiment has grown is because of the mass shootings that have made the news in recent years? 

Personally, I think people should be able to own guns but should have to register 'em like cars.  Ex-felons should not be able to own guns, but everyone else should be able to own one.

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #41 on: November 13, 2013, 12:32:51 PM »
What a difference a few weeks and a bunch of lying makes. 

Republicans mount shock comeback, erase Democrats’ edge in eyes of Americans
By David Sherfinski
The Washington Times Wednesday, November 13, 2013

In just six weeks, Republicans have completely erased a 9-point deficit in a generic congressional ballot question and are now running even with Democrats.

Thirty-nine percent of registered voters say they would vote for a Democrat in their district — and the same percentage say they would vote for a Republican — if elections for the U.S. House of Representatives were held today, according to numbers from a Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday.

Last month, Democrats had held a nine-point advantage on the same question, 43 percent to 34 percent.

Independent voters favored Democrats in October, 32 percent to 30 percent, but now favor Republicans by a 37 percent to 26 percent margin.

That’s not to say voters are wildly impressed with either party; 20 percent approve of the way congressional Republicans are handling their jobs, compared with 73 percent who disapprove. Interestingly, 30 percent approve of how Democrats in Congress are handling their jobs, compared to 62 percent who disapprove.

A similar split is evident in voters’ opinion of both major political parties. Thirty-eight percent have a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party, compared to 48 percent who have an unfavorable opinion. Meanwhile, 31 percent have a favorable opinion of the Republican Party, with 54 percent holding an unfavorable opinion of the GOP.

A majority of voters don’t like how top congressional leaders are handling their jobs: 58 disapprove of House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, 55 percent disapprove of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, and 52 percent disapprove of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat.

A plurality of voters — 46 percent to 27 percent — disapprove of how Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, is handling his job.

“In Washington today, it comes down to who the voters dislike the least,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. “There are no heroes.”

The poll of 2,545 registered voters was conducted from Nov. 6-11 and has a margin of error of 1.9 percentage points.

Thirty-two percent of respondents self-identified as Democrats, 26 percent said they were Republicans, and 35 percent said they were independents.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/13/gop-erases-9-point-deficit-generic-congressional-b/#ixzz2kYFkmqIF

Still a long way to go before the election and who knows what will have happened to change things by then.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63969
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #42 on: November 13, 2013, 12:45:16 PM »
Still a long way to go before the election and who knows what will have happened to change things by then.

True.

Jack T. Cross

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #43 on: November 13, 2013, 01:02:21 PM »
Quote
"You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them," Obama said. "And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

So if a person disapproves of the way these trade agreements are formed, they are "anti-trade". I see.

What an elitist POS, HN, etc.

Jack T. Cross

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #44 on: November 13, 2013, 01:06:54 PM »
I've really come to dislike this guy over time. He's quite the annoying bullshitter, isn't he?

Jack T. Cross

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #45 on: November 13, 2013, 01:09:25 PM »
...destructive bullshitter, I should say. Very destructive.

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #46 on: November 13, 2013, 01:21:19 PM »
...destructive bullshitter, I should say. Very destructive.

Not sure why it was particularly destructive but it was insensitive and I think it did smack of pop-psychology bullshit. 

He should have just said that a lot of those people are unhappy because they feel like they've gotten the short end of the stick and are worried about being screwed over further. 

Jack T. Cross

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #47 on: November 13, 2013, 01:38:36 PM »
Not sure why it was particularly destructive but it was insensitive and I think it did smack of pop-psychology bullshit.

Yes, it is absolutely destructive when the highest politician in the country makes such a statement.

He should have just said that a lot of those people are unhappy because they feel like they've gotten the short end of the stick and are worried about being screwed over further.  

So you think he should acknowledge that screwing over has taken place, right? How, exactly, do you envision him describing the screwing-over?

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #48 on: November 13, 2013, 03:20:02 PM »
Yes, it is absolutely destructive when the highest politician in the country makes such a statement.

So you think he should acknowledge that screwing over has taken place, right? How, exactly, do you envision him describing the screwing-over?

That's a tricky question.  If he didn't want to point fingers, he'd have to portray it as them being victims of the economy, I guess.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63969
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Democrats Have A Shot At Taking Back The House
« Reply #49 on: November 26, 2013, 10:17:42 AM »
CNN/ORC poll: Democrats lose 2014 edge following Obamacare uproar
Posted by
CNN Political Editor Paul Steinhauser

Washington (CNN) – What a difference a month makes.

A new CNN/ORC International poll indicates a dramatic turnaround in the battle for control of Congress in next year's midterm elections.

Democrats a month ago held a 50%-42% advantage among registered voters in a generic ballot, which asked respondents to choose between a Democrat or Republican in their congressional district without identifying the candidates.

That result came after congressional Republicans appeared to overplay their hand in the bitter fight over the federal government shutdown and the debt ceiling.

But the Democratic lead has disappeared. A new CNN/ORC poll indicates the GOP now holds a 49%-47% edge.

The new survey was conducted last week and released Tuesday.

The 10-point swing follows a political uproar over Obamacare, which included the botched rollout of HealthCare.gov and controversy over insurance policy cancelations due primarily to the new health law.

The turnaround in the CNN/ORC poll follows similar shifts in recent national surveys from Quinnipiac University and Fox News.

At a news conference two weeks ago, President Barack Obama acknowledged that problems plaguing the startup of the new healthcare law could hurt Democrats.

"There is no doubt that our failure to rollout the ACA smoothly has put a burden on Democrats, whether they are running or not because they stood up and supported this effort through thick and thin," Obama said.

The CNN/ORC poll, released as the President makes a West Coast campaign fundraising swing on behalf of fellow Democrats, indicates both parties making gains within their base.

"It looks like the biggest shifts toward the Republicans came among white voters, higher-income Americans, and people who live in rural areas, while Democrats have gained strength in the past month among some of their natural constituencies, such as non-white voters and lower-income Americans," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

"If those patterns persist into 2014, it may indicate that Obamacare is popular among those who it was designed to help the most, but unpopular among the larger group of voters who are personally less concerned about health insurance and health care," Holland said.

Republicans currently have a 17-seat advantage in the U.S. House with the Democrats holding a 55-45 majority in the Senate.

While the generic ballot question is one of the most commonly used indicators when it comes to the battle for Congress, the poll results are a long way from predicting what will happen next November.

"There is just under a year to go before any votes are actually cast and the 'generic ballot' question is not necessarily a good predictor of the actual outcome of 435 separate elections," Holland cautions.

"A year before the 2010 midterms, for example, the Democrats held a six-point lead on the generic ballot but the GOP wound up regaining control of the House in that election cycle, thanks to an historic 63-seat pickup," he said.

The poll was conducted November 18-20 for CNN by ORC International, with 843 adult Americans, including 749 registered voters, questioned by telephone. The survey's overall sampling error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/26/cnnorc-poll-democrats-lose-2014-edge-following-obamacare-uproar/?hpt=hp_t2