Author Topic: Just rewatched AHX after a few years  (Read 814 times)

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Just rewatched AHX after a few years
« on: January 02, 2014, 08:11:43 AM »
And norton was tiny, cant have been more than 165-70 at 12%, not sure why people thought he was big

Wez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1148
Re: Just rewatched AHX after a few years
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2014, 08:30:39 AM »
Cause normally he's 120.

MisterMagoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5591
  • And now, what joy will I have left to live for?
Re: Just rewatched AHX after a few years
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2014, 08:45:14 AM »
ving rhames is 200lb and never benched more than 300 but he's known as a "huge" guy.

people forget that hollywood big is pretty small. an actual bodybuilder on screen would look cartoonish and stupid (not that they don't anyway)

Meaningless

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 453
Re: Just rewatched AHX after a few years
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2014, 01:38:56 PM »
He was 180lbs I think, I too used to think he was big and wanted to look like him.

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: Just rewatched AHX after a few years
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2014, 01:41:25 PM »
ving rhames is 200lb and never benched more than 300 but he's known as a "huge" guy.

people forget that hollywood big is pretty small. an actual bodybuilder on screen would look cartoonish and stupid (not that they don't anyway)
too bad they didnt make a hollywood film about ronnie coleman 2000-2004

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16942
  • MAGA
Re: Just rewatched AHX after a few years
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2014, 01:53:26 PM »
what AHX?

Wez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1148
Re: Just rewatched AHX after a few years
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2014, 01:55:03 PM »
what AHX?

American History X.....a great movie.

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: Just rewatched AHX after a few years
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2014, 02:11:50 PM »
And norton was tiny, cant have been more than 165-70 at 12%, not sure why people thought he was big
i doubt grown men thought he was big