I think it was Muscular Development that had a picture of Dillet's arm being taped at 26". Could have been a bogus tape though.It was in his column,The Word. Seems a little rediculous,26".Dillets definately are the biggest though.Sick tris, no one really talks about them either. Everyone saying Arnolds are 20" need to wake up.My are 18" and Arnolds are sure as hell more than 2" bigger.I'd say 22".
arthur jones measured arnold's arm, so you would have to bring that up with him.
To put all this into perspective:Assuming a perfectly circular upper arm:16'' arm has a cross sectional area of (162/12.566) =20.37243355 inches217'' arm has a cross sectional area of 22.998 inches218'' arm has a cross sectional area of 25.783 inches219'' arm has a cross sectional area of 28.728 inches220'' arm has a cross sectional area of 31.831 inches221'' arm has a cross sectional area of 35.094 inches222'' arm has a cross sectional area of 38.516 inches223'' arm has a cross sectional area of 42.097 inches224'' arm has a cross sectional area of 45.837 inches225'' arm has a cross sectional area of 49.737 inches226'' arm has a cross sectional area of 53.795 inches2Does anyone notice the trend here??The amount of muscle needed to increase the cross sectional area increases exponentially...16'' to 17'' means gaining 2.626 inches217'' to 18'' means gaining 2.785 inches218'' to 19'' means gaining 2.944 inches219'' to 20'' means gaining 3.103 inches220'' to 21'' means gaining 3.262 inches221'' to 22'' means gaining 3.421 inches222'' to 23'' means gaining 3.581 inches223'' to 24'' means gaining 3.740 inches224'' to 25'' means gaining 3.899 inches225'' to 26'' means gaining 4.058 inches2...there is a HUGE difference between a 17'' arm and an 18'' arm, the difference between a 20'' arm and a 21'' arm is ABSOLUTELY ENORMOUS. By extrapolation, if you had to gain 15 lbs of bodyweight to go from a 16'' arm to a 17'' arm, then you'd still have to gain another 176 lbs of solid muscle to get 26'' arms.Get real people... Ronnie's arms are probably around 22'' in contest shape... maybe 23'' at 320 lbs offseason.Whereas Arnold was about 50 lbs of muscle away from having 22'' arms. Contest day... Arnold's arms were probably about 19'' maybe 19.5'' at most.The Luke
no way man arnold's arms were 22.
Valentino's arms are much cooler than Manfred Hoerbel's ever were, but Manfred was a pretty good strongman so you've got to give hims points for that.
not even close to 23 or 24 inches
ive got more that show the "good" arm. dont be such a bitch when you boy aint as swollen as when he is in your mouth. this was nov 15 directly aftter the o and gp tour. not enough time to go off and shrink, dont even try that excuse.
2006 Ronnie may not have 24 inch arms.but look at Ronnie 2004 : I wouldn't be surprised if they were as big as Dilletts:
When those were taken maybe. What a worthless post.Were you as annoying there in person as you are here or did you actually have something positive to share?Yates' 16s. Using your logic we should assume this was his peak condition LOL
ronnie said bowflex is worthless
Ronnie is right.
You guys should get our ass to the gym, and look these guys in real life. You can't measure them by the pictures or youtube clips, you have to see them yourself. I have seen bunch of old pro's in action while they were training for finnish grand prix, and they were big. I mean BIG. You can't see it from the picture, but every one of these pro's are so fucking big, that you cannot understand it before you see it in your own eyes.
whoooooosssssshhhhhhhhhh
That is one of the most insane pics I have ever seen. Ronnie's shoulders are almost twice the size of his head.