Author Topic: Liberal Hypocrisy  (Read 95908 times)

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #300 on: January 29, 2018, 05:11:57 AM »
You people seem to be fixated on the word "liberal" when in reality it is anything but.

The left has been hijacked by fringe groups commanded by billionaires.

It certainly isn't liberalism, it's something else.

I consider myself a true liberal and have no problem recognizing the fact that the current left isn't about leftist ideals, it's something else.

Yes,

Like refusing to have a conversation about the issues at hand; instead they just shout: "Racist, Sexist, Homophobic, Transphobic, Redneck, Trumptard, etc., etc. etc. etc."
a

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #301 on: February 06, 2018, 01:46:08 PM »
Dems blasting Nunes memo once urged FISA court transparency
Brooke Singman By Brooke Singman   | Fox News

Congressional Democrats have blasted House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and President Trump for releasing a memo detailing alleged government surveillance abuse—but just a few years ago, the same Democrats called for more transparency from the secret court process in question.

Notably, ranking Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff -- who fought the release of the GOP-backed memo and described it as a danger to national security -- made a 2013 appearance on Russian television news station RT calling for transparency in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act system.

Schiff said in 2013 that the FISA court needed to be “much more transparent so that the American people can understand what is being done in their name and in the name of national security so that we can have a more informed debate over the balance between privacy and security.”


He added: “I think this can be accomplished while also maintaining sources and methods and not compromising some of the very real national security concerns at stake.”

Fast-forward to last week. When the committee voted to release the Nunes memo, Schiff said it was a “very sad day” in “the history of this committee.”

NUNES' FISA MEMO SPARKS REACTION FROM POLITICIANS

“Today, this committee voted to put the president’s personal interests, perhaps their own political interests, above the national interest,” Schiff said last week after the vote.

Aside from their claims that the release of the memo posed a security concern, Democrats argued that the memo was misleading and politically motivated. They are now pushing to release their own 10-page rebuttal memo, which the committee approved Monday and is now before the White House for review.

The GOP-authored memo detailed how the FBI and DOJ sought a surveillance warrant for a former Trump campaign adviser. It included former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe’s purported testimony that the warrants would not have been sought without the unverified anti-Trump dossier.

When asked why Schiff’s position on FISA transparency has seemingly taken a different tone, his office defended his 2013 stance -- and suggested it is Republicans changing their tone.

“I introduced bipartisan legislation in 2013 to require Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court opinions which contained significant statutory construction or interpretation to be declassified, with appropriate redactions,” Schiff said in a statement to Fox News Tuesday.  “A very similar provision was signed into law as part of the bipartisan USA FREEDOM Act, which I supported because when the FISC engages in a significant constitutional or statutory analysis, for instance on authorizing bulk collection of phone records, the public interest in transparency should be weighed.”

He added: “That is a wholly different issue than declassifying a FISC order authorizing surveillance against a particular agent of a foreign power, which by its nature includes highly classified sources and methods and which would alert the targets of the surveillance and allow them to evade detection. It is ironic many of the members who expressed concern that the USA FREEDOM Act went too far now are among those pushing for the release of FISA materials in an ‘extraordinarily reckless’ fashion, in the words of the DOJ.”

But Schiff isn’t the only Democrat blasting the Nunes memo who once talked up FISA court transparency.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., in July 2013 told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes that the FISA court “is responsible for striking a balance” and that “it ought to be more transparent” and “more accountable.”

Blumenthal also said in August 2013 on Fox News that there needed “to be changes” in the court “so that it can better uncover and scrutinize and oversee potential abuses.”

But this week, Blumenthal blasted the release of the GOP memo as “reminiscent of the darkest days of the McCarthy era.”

“It endangers methods and sources of the intelligence community,” Blumenthal said last week on CNN’s “New Day.” “And it reflects an effort to distract from the [Robert] Mueller investigation.”

Also in 2013, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., called for “stronger oversight” of the “intelligence community’s use” of FISA.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. greets President Barack Obama after the president gave his State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday Feb. 12, 2013. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, Pool)
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., left, said during the Obama administration in 2013 that there needed to be "stronger oversight" in FISA processes.  (AP)
He slammed the release of the GOP memo.

“This memo has nothing to do with FISA oversight, and everything to do with the President and certain Republicans attempting to undermine the Russia investigation,” Leahy tweeted on Friday.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/06/dems-blasting-nunes-memo-once-backed-fisa-court-transparency.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #302 on: February 08, 2018, 12:03:49 PM »
Nancy Pelosi Didn’t Used To Think $40 Was ‘Crumbs’
AMBER ATHEY
Media Reporter
02/08/2018

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has been trashing the $1000 bonuses companies are giving to employees because of tax reform, but her comments don’t square with what she said about an Obama-era payroll tax cut.

In Obama’s second term, the White House boasted that they had extended a payroll tax cut that would give Americans $40 extra dollars per paycheck — about $2000 a year.

Pelosi tweeted about how helpful the $40 would be for families, writing, “each paycheck will make a difference.”

Nancy Pelosi‏Verified account
@NancyPelosi
Follow Follow @NancyPelosi
Today's agreement is a victory for the American people-they spoke out clearly & #40dollars each paycheck will make a difference.
4:08 PM - 22 Dec 2011

Yet after businesses began giving employees $1000 and $2000 bonuses, plus additional benefits, Pelosi repeatedly called the money “crumbs.” (RELATED: Pelosi: $1,000 Is ‘Crumbs’ For The Middle Class)

Despite backlash over her insistence that the bonuses weren’t significant for middle class families, Pelosi doubled down on her comments, stating, “They give banquets to… the high end, to corporate America, and I say ‘crumbs.'”

http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/08/nancy-pelosi-didnt-used-to-think-40-was-crumbs/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #303 on: February 08, 2018, 08:30:57 PM »


SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Democratic Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia, the head of the Legislative Women's Caucus and a leading figure in the state's anti-sexual harassment movement, is accused of groping a male staffer from another lawmaker's office, according to a report published Thursday.

The incident occurred in a dugout after a softball game in 2014 and now is being investigated by the Assembly, Politico reported. Daniel Fierro didn't report it at the time but in January mentioned it to his former boss, Democratic Assemblyman Ian Calderon, who reported it to Assembly leaders.

Fierro, who was 25 at the time, said after the game Garcia stroked his back, squeezed his buttocks and attempted to touch his crotch. He said he was interviewed by an outside law firm hired by the Assembly Rules Committee last Friday. Politico also reported that a lobbyist who declined to be named claimed Garcia made crude sexual comments and tried to grab his crotch at a 2017 fundraiser.

Garcia, who has spoken out strongly against her male colleagues who have been accused of sexual harassment, said she was unaware of the claims until Thursday.

"Every complaint about sexual harassment should be taken seriously and I will participate fully in any investigation that takes place," the Los Angeles-area lawmaker said in a statement. "I have zero recollection of engaging in inappropriate behavior and such behavior is inconsistent with my values."

Fierro and the lobbyist said it appeared Garcia was inebriated at the time of the encounters.

In a November interview with The Associated Press about alcohol-fueled fundraisers and other after-work events that are a part of regular business in Sacramento, Garcia said blaming alcohol isn't an acceptable excuse for sexually inappropriate behavior. It's men who chose to misbehave, not the social events themselves, that create the problems, she said.

"I would say that most of the public realizes that our job is based on relationships, and so we are expected to go out there and socialize," she said. "I think our public also expects us to hold ourselves to a higher standard."

The Assembly committee said last week that eight allegations of sexual harassment are pending in the Assembly but did not divulge any names. Debra Gravert, the chief administrative officer, didn't respond to an email from The Associated Press seeking confirmation that Garcia is under investigation and clarifying whether Fierro's allegation is one of the eight pending.

Fierro, of Cerritos, now runs a communications firm. He previously worked for Calderon, who became the majority leader. Lerna Shirinian, Calderon's communications director, said Fierro told her about the incident right after it happened.

"He was in shock, I was in shock — but the culture was very different back then," Shirinian said.

Garcia was elected in 2012 and has carved out a name as a champion of women's issues and environmental health for poor communities. She chairs the Women's Caucus and her photo was featured in Time Magazine's Person of the Year issue on being one of the "Silence Breakers" on sexual harassment.

"I refuse to work with (Assemblyman Raul Bocanegra) and anyone who takes part in harassment or assault," she tweeted in October after it was reported Bocanegra had been disciplined in 2009 for groping a colleague. Bocanegra later resigned after more women made public accusations.

Garcia was a fierce advocate for legislation signed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Monday giving legislative staff members whistleblower protections for reporting sexual misconduct or other misbehavior, speaking at a rally on the Capitol steps after its passage. She's tweeted repeatedly about the importance of sexual consent in recent days.

Democratic Sen. Connie Leyva, co-chair of the women's caucus, said she was "shocked and disturbed" at the allegations and she will ask the group to meet soon to discuss Garcia's fate as leader.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/male-staffer-accuses-california-assemblywoman-misconduct-003752466.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #304 on: February 13, 2018, 06:07:23 PM »
Gavin Newsom: Jeff Sessions ‘Outright Racist’ for Praising ‘Anglo-American’ Legal Traditions
by TONY LEE
13 Feb 2018

California Lieutenant Governor and gubernatorial candidate Gavin Newsom called Attorney General Jeff Sessions an “outright racist” on Monday evening for saying that sheriffs are a “critical part of the Anglo-American heritage of law enforcement.”
“Reminder that our Attorney General is an outright racist who wants us all to acknowledge ‘Anglo-American heritage,’” tweeted Newsom, who is running to lead the “Resistance State.”
 
Gavin Newsom

@GavinNewsom
Reminder that our Attorney General is an outright racist who wants us all to acknowledge "Anglo-American heritage."
3:03 PM - Feb 12, 2018
2,803
1,469 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Sessions made his factually accurate remarks while addressing the National Sheriffs Association, pointing out from where the unique concept of a sheriff originated, as Breitbart News noted:

The concept of a “sheriff” dates back more than 1000 years to pre-Norman Conquest Anglo-Saxon England where the “shire reeve” (the origin of the term sheriff) was a representative the King who operated with great independence to do justice at the local level. The sheriff as the enforcement wing of a local court is a unique feature of the English common law tradition from which our own legal system almost entirely derives.

Only countries like the United States, who inherit their “common law” legal systems from that of England, keep the tradition of the sheriff alive. Consequentially, outside of the United Kingdom and America, there are sheriffs in the former British Colonies of Australia, Nigeria, Canada, South Africa, and even India, where the office survives as a ceremonial position of honor.

In America, sheriffs are uniquely prominent elected officials responsible for virtually all state and local courts’ enforcement and, outside of major cities, much of the policing.

Liberals and legacy media reporters, who were never offended when then-Senator Barack Obama and members of Obama’s administration spoke about America’s Anglo-American legal heritage, immediately lost their minds after Sessions’ remarks, claiming Sessions revealed his racial insensitivity and animus.

A Department of Justice spokesman, Ian Prior, had to explain to legacy media outlets like CNN that “Anglo-American” is another way of saying common law and is regularly used among those in the legal community.

“As most law students learn in the first week of their first year, Anglo-American law — also known as the common law — is a shared legal heritage between England and America. The sheriff is unique to that shared legal heritage. Before reporters sloppily imply nefarious meaning behind the term, we would suggest that they read any number of the Supreme Court opinions that use the term. Or they could simply put ‘Anglo-American law’ into Google,” Prior explained to outlets like CNN.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/13/gavin-newsom-jeff-sessions-outright-racist-praising-anglo-american-legal-traditions/

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15617
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #305 on: February 13, 2018, 06:11:00 PM »
Nancy Pelosi Didn’t Used To Think $40 Was ‘Crumbs’
AMBER ATHEY
Media Reporter
02/08/2018

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has been trashing the $1000 bonuses companies are giving to employees because of tax reform, but her comments don’t square with what she said about an Obama-era payroll tax cut.

In Obama’s second term, the White House boasted that they had extended a payroll tax cut that would give Americans $40 extra dollars per paycheck — about $2000 a year.

Pelosi tweeted about how helpful the $40 would be for families, writing, “each paycheck will make a difference.”

Nancy Pelosi‏Verified account
@NancyPelosi
Follow Follow @NancyPelosi
Today's agreement is a victory for the American people-they spoke out clearly & #40dollars each paycheck will make a difference.
4:08 PM - 22 Dec 2011

Yet after businesses began giving employees $1000 and $2000 bonuses, plus additional benefits, Pelosi repeatedly called the money “crumbs.” (RELATED: Pelosi: $1,000 Is ‘Crumbs’ For The Middle Class)

Despite backlash over her insistence that the bonuses weren’t significant for middle class families, Pelosi doubled down on her comments, stating, “They give banquets to… the high end, to corporate America, and I say ‘crumbs.'”

http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/08/nancy-pelosi-didnt-used-to-think-40-was-crumbs/

GOP rep unveils 'Crumbs Act' to make bonuses tax-free, in swipe at Pelosi

A Republican lawmaker is set to unveil legislation that would make most bonuses given out as a result of President Trump's tax reform plan tax-free -- and took a jab at House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi with the bill's name.

Rep. Todd Rokita, R-Ind., has dubbed his bill the "Creating Relief and Useful Middle-Class Benefits and Savings" -- or "CRUMBS" Act. Pelosi, D-Calif., famously referred to the bonuses as "crumbs" in criticizing the tax plan last month.

"Americans are receiving thousands of dollars in bonuses and more money in their paychecks thanks to President Trump's tax reform, but out-of-touch Democratic leaders believe they only amount to crumbs," Rokita said in a statement. "The CRUMBS Act will let Americans keep more of the money they receive as a result of President Trump's tax reform, and allow them, not the government, to choose how best to spend their bonuses

Rokita's bill would make bonuses received by workers in 2018 tax-free up to $2,500. Since tax reform was signed into law this past December, multiple companies have given out bonuses and pay raises in anticipation of increased tax savings.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/13/gop-rep-unveils-crumbs-act-to-make-bonuses-tax-free-in-swipe-at-pelosi.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #306 on: February 13, 2018, 06:26:28 PM »
GOP rep unveils 'Crumbs Act' to make bonuses tax-free, in swipe at Pelosi

A Republican lawmaker is set to unveil legislation that would make most bonuses given out as a result of President Trump's tax reform plan tax-free -- and took a jab at House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi with the bill's name.

Rep. Todd Rokita, R-Ind., has dubbed his bill the "Creating Relief and Useful Middle-Class Benefits and Savings" -- or "CRUMBS" Act. Pelosi, D-Calif., famously referred to the bonuses as "crumbs" in criticizing the tax plan last month.

"Americans are receiving thousands of dollars in bonuses and more money in their paychecks thanks to President Trump's tax reform, but out-of-touch Democratic leaders believe they only amount to crumbs," Rokita said in a statement. "The CRUMBS Act will let Americans keep more of the money they receive as a result of President Trump's tax reform, and allow them, not the government, to choose how best to spend their bonuses

Rokita's bill would make bonuses received by workers in 2018 tax-free up to $2,500. Since tax reform was signed into law this past December, multiple companies have given out bonuses and pay raises in anticipation of increased tax savings.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/13/gop-rep-unveils-crumbs-act-to-make-bonuses-tax-free-in-swipe-at-pelosi.html

Brilliant.  lol   :)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39372
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #307 on: February 14, 2018, 04:48:05 AM »
GOP rep unveils 'Crumbs Act' to make bonuses tax-free, in swipe at Pelosi

A Republican lawmaker is set to unveil legislation that would make most bonuses given out as a result of President Trump's tax reform plan tax-free -- and took a jab at House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi with the bill's name.

Rep. Todd Rokita, R-Ind., has dubbed his bill the "Creating Relief and Useful Middle-Class Benefits and Savings" -- or "CRUMBS" Act. Pelosi, D-Calif., famously referred to the bonuses as "crumbs" in criticizing the tax plan last month.

"Americans are receiving thousands of dollars in bonuses and more money in their paychecks thanks to President Trump's tax reform, but out-of-touch Democratic leaders believe they only amount to crumbs," Rokita said in a statement. "The CRUMBS Act will let Americans keep more of the money they receive as a result of President Trump's tax reform, and allow them, not the government, to choose how best to spend their bonuses

Rokita's bill would make bonuses received by workers in 2018 tax-free up to $2,500. Since tax reform was signed into law this past December, multiple companies have given out bonuses and pay raises in anticipation of increased tax savings.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/13/gop-rep-unveils-crumbs-act-to-make-bonuses-tax-free-in-swipe-at-pelosi.html

 ;D

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10946
  • Getbig!
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #308 on: February 14, 2018, 08:51:52 PM »

TheGrinch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #309 on: February 14, 2018, 10:37:57 PM »
Feminists Are Ditching ‘Pussyhats’ Because They’re Racist and Transphobic

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455377/pussyhats-racist-transphobic-feminists-say


Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #310 on: February 19, 2018, 04:18:57 AM »
 8)
a

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #311 on: February 21, 2018, 12:24:49 PM »
California Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia denies groping accusations
CBS NEWS February 20, 2018

A California state lawmaker at the forefront of the #MeToo movement faces a growing number of sexual misconduct allegations herself. Four former employees filed a formal complaint against Democratic Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia. Another says he was fired after protesting when she suggested playing "spin the bottle."

Garcia has authored numerous bills about sexual assault and consent. She was even recently featured in Time magazine's "Persons of the Year" issue recognizing the #MeToo movement's "silence breakers." But now she is on voluntary leave, as investigators look into claims she groped two men.

Daniel Fierro was working in the California State Capitol when he said Garcia cornered him at a staff softball game.

"I remember feeling a little confused about what happened," Fierro said.
 
"She touched you sexually?" Villarreal asked.

"Yea, she -- her hand dropped down. She touched – she grabbed my butt. And I spun to turn around … and as I turned, she tried to reach for my crotch and she did," Fierro said.

When Villarreal asked Garcia whether Fierro's claims happened, Garcia said, "No." 
 
"What do you remember happening that day?" Villarreal asked.

"I was at the game at the end of the game… And I left with some staff and with some members, and so I have faith that the investigation will make sure and have the facts around it and clear my name," Garcia said.

A second unnamed accuser also claims Garcia made a graphic sexual proposal before groping him, something she denies.
 
The four former state employees that have filed the formal complaint allege Garcia talked openly about "sexual activities with other elected officials," claimed to have sex in "assembly offices" and said "having sex… was a good way of getting information."

"That's definitely not anything that happened. Not only did I not have those conversations, but I'm also not engaging in sex for information or for votes," Garcia said.

As a #MeToo activist, she's called on those accused of harassment to resign immediately – but she does not plan to do so herself.

"I don't know if I would go so far as to say that it's hypocritical. What I do know is that it's incredibly questionable," Fierro said.

"I'm going to be respectful of the process. I've been trying really hard to be respectful of people coming forward," Garcia said. "I've never had allegations like this against me."

Garcia has yet to be interviewed by investigators. She's on unpaid leave until the investigation is complete. There's no clear timeline on when that will be.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cristina-garcia-california-assemblywoman-denies-sexual-misconduct-accusations/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #312 on: March 15, 2018, 12:30:54 PM »
Pretty funny.

Nolte — From Pro-Putin to Anti-Putin: Media Mold Rex Tillerson to Fit Their Russia Conspiracy Theory
by JOHN NOLTE
15 Mar 2018
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/03/15/pro-putin-anti-putin-media-mold-tillerson-fit-russia-conspiracy-theory/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #313 on: March 21, 2018, 09:55:34 AM »
What’s genius for Obama is scandal when it comes to Trump
BY BEN SHAPIRO, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 03/20/18

On Sunday, The Guardian reported on the supposedly nefarious workings of President Trump’s data-gathering team at Cambridge Analytica. The report suggested that Cambridge Analytica had essentially issued questionnaires through a third party; those questionnaires, which were personality quizzes, requested that you use your Facebook login. Cambridge Analytica then compiled data regarding those who completed the quiz and cross-referenced that data with political preferences in order to target potential voters.

This isn’t particularly shocking. In 2012, The Guardian reported that President Obama’s reelection team was “building a vast digital data operation that for the first time combines a unified database on millions of Americans with the power of Facebook to target individual voters to a degree never achieved before.”

What, exactly, would Obama be doing? According to The Guardian, Obama’s new database would be gathered by asking individual volunteers to log into Obama’s reelection site using their Facebook credentials. “Consciously or otherwise,” The Guardian states, “the individual volunteer will be injecting all the information they store publicly on their Facebook page — home location, date of birth, interests and, crucially, network of friends — directly into the central Obama database.”

Facebook had no problem with such activity then. They do now. There’s a reason for that. The former Obama director of integration and media analytics stated that, during the 2012 campaign, Facebook allowed the Obama team to “suck out the whole social graph”; Facebook “was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing.” She added, “They came to [the] office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”

Not so with Trump. As soon as Facebook realized that Cambridge Analytica had pursued a similar strategy, they suspended the firm.

Again, this isn’t surprising. Since Trump’s election, Democrats — in search of a rationale for their favored candidate’s defeat — have blamed a bevy of social media outlets. Senate Democrats trotted out pathetic Russian-created memes on Facebook, viewed by a handful of human beings, as an excuse for Hillary’s loss; Democrats claimed — without evidence — that “fake news” had swamped Facebook and thus led to Trump’s victory. Democrats have also insisted that Facebook be regulated. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) raged, “You’ve created these platforms, and now they’re being misused, and you have to be the ones to do something about it. Or we will.” Facebook’s former privacy manager called for the government to step into an oversight role regarding Facebook.

In February, Wired magazine ran a cover story specifically dealing with Facebook’s role in the election of 2016, and their subsequent attempts to “fix” the problem. After the election, Mark Zuckerberg even met with Barack Obama, apparently in an attempt to convince Obama that he was serious about stopping the “misuse” of the platform. And in February, Zuckerberg said he wanted to re-jigger the algorithms on his platform to benefit content that Facebook deems “trustworthy, informative, and local.” Wired celebrated: “You can’t make the world more open and connected if you’re breaking it apart.”

The result of Facebook’s algorithmic changes: conservatives have been slammed. And that’s the point. A study from The Western Journal found that conservative sites have lost an average of 14 percent of their Facebook traffic; leftist sites saw a minor increase. Even major publications saw that effect: The New York Daily News saw a bump of 24.18 percent, while the New York Post dropped 11.44 percent.

And that’s the goal in covering Cambridge Analytica, and Russian interference on Twitter, and all the rest — even without any serious information suggesting that such interference shifted votes, the left can rest assured that its Silicon Valley allies will act to de-platform Republicans and conservatives. There’s a reason Twitter has suspended alt-right racists but continued to recommend that others follow Louis Farrakhan; there’s a reason YouTube is being sued by Prager University; there’s a reason Google used automatic fact-checking on right-wing sites but did no such thing for left-wing sites.

We’re in the midst of a radical reshifting in social media. Ironically, the people who have stumped against regulation — conservatives — are those being targeted by social media companies. If companies like Facebook, YouTube, Google and Twitter don’t start acting like platforms again rather than like motivated left-wing outlets, Republicans likely won’t let principle outweigh practicality for long.

http://thehill.com/opinion/technology/379245-whats-genius-for-obama-is-scandal-when-it-comes-to-trump

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #314 on: March 21, 2018, 10:10:42 AM »
Obama Called Putin in 2012 to Congratulate Him on His Election Victory
By Theodore Bunker    |   Wednesday, 21 Mar 2018

In 2012, President Barack Obama called Russian President-elect Vladimir Putin to "to congratulate him on his recent victory," just as President Donald Trump and other world leaders did following Putin's re-election this year.

Trump congratulated Putin on Tuesday, over the objections of his national security advisers, for winning what international election monitors called an "overtly controlled" election, according to CNN.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., slammed the president for "congratulating dictators on winning sham elections," in a Tweet.

In 2012, the White House released a statement in the late afternoon on a Friday stating that "President Obama called Russian President-elect and Prime Minister Putin to congratulate him on his recent victory in the Russian Presidential election," according to Foreign Policy.

Putin's election in 2012 sparked similar criticisms from international election authorities, one observer noted that the race had "no real competition," and that "the ultimate winner of the election was never in doubt," according to The New York Times.

However, The Washington Post notes that even Trump's own advisers warned against congratulating Putin at this time, following the poisoning of a former Russian spy in the U.K. and the ongoing investigation into Russian election interference and connections to the Trump campaign.

In his briefing materials that day, Trump's advisers had included a note stating: "DO NOT CONGRATULATE."

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/obama-putin-victory-congratulations/2018/03/21/id/849925/

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #315 on: March 21, 2018, 04:13:53 PM »
Obama Called Putin in 2012 to Congratulate Him on His Election Victory
By Theodore Bunker    |   Wednesday, 21 Mar 2018

In 2012, President Barack Obama called Russian President-elect Vladimir Putin to "to congratulate him on his recent victory," just as President Donald Trump and other world leaders did following Putin's re-election this year.

Trump congratulated Putin on Tuesday, over the objections of his national security advisers, for winning what international election monitors called an "overtly controlled" election, according to CNN.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., slammed the president for "congratulating dictators on winning sham elections," in a Tweet.

In 2012, the White House released a statement in the late afternoon on a Friday stating that "President Obama called Russian President-elect and Prime Minister Putin to congratulate him on his recent victory in the Russian Presidential election," according to Foreign Policy.

Putin's election in 2012 sparked similar criticisms from international election authorities, one observer noted that the race had "no real competition," and that "the ultimate winner of the election was never in doubt," according to The New York Times.

However, The Washington Post notes that even Trump's own advisers warned against congratulating Putin at this time, following the poisoning of a former Russian spy in the U.K. and the ongoing investigation into Russian election interference and connections to the Trump campaign.

In his briefing materials that day, Trump's advisers had included a note stating: "DO NOT CONGRATULATE."

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/obama-putin-victory-congratulations/2018/03/21/id/849925/

Yeah Sarah Sanders brought that exact point up in the press briefing today.

Same old played out media hypocrisy.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #316 on: March 30, 2018, 03:27:20 PM »
Flashback: Hillary and Media Scoffed at ‘Sleek, Sexy’ Accuser’s Payday
By Scott Whitlock | March 30, 2018

Given how much coverage the networks have devoted to Stormy Daniels’s claims of an affair with Donald Trump, it might be worth remembering how Hillary Clinton and ABC journalists reacted to Bill Clinton's accuser Gennifer Flowers in 1992.

Stormy Daniels received $130,000 from Trump’s lawyer before the 2016 election. Speaking of $130,000, here’s Clinton on the January 30, 1992 edition of PrimeTime Live:

If somebody's willing to pay you $130,000 or $170,000 to say something and you get your fifteen minutes of fame and you get your picture on the front page of every newspaper and you're some failed cabaret singer who doesn't even have much of a resume to fall back on, and what's there, she lied about —  you know, that's the daughter of Willie Horton, as far as I'm concerned. It's the same kind of attempt to keep the real issues of this country out of the mainstream debate where they need to be.
-- Hillary Clinton on ABC's PrimeTime Live, January 30, 1992.
From March 7 to March 25, ABC, CBS and NBC devoted 23 segments and 40 minutes of airtime to the Daniels controversy. On March 26, these networks offered a staggering 61 minutes to the porn star’s appearance on 60 Minutes.

Clearly, 2018 journalists are not following the advice of 1992 Clinton. On that same program, ABC journalist Sam Donaldson dismissed Flowers as the sleek “nightmare” of every married woman:

Gennifer Flowers, who was paid by the tabloid Star to tell her story involving Bill Clinton and to play her tapes of alleged Clinton phone conversations, has the look of every married woman's nightmare: sleek, sexy, a blond femme fatale.
On this Sunday's 60 Minutes, Anchor Anderson Cooper did not disparage porn star Daniels as a “sleek,” “blond” “nightmare.”

Some other interesting moments from the 1992 program. Then-ABC co-host Diane Sawyer said of Mrs. Clinton: “Some wonder whether she should be running for the White House.” Even back then, journalists had their eye on Hillary's future.

Regarding allegations of her husband’s infidelities, Mrs. Clinton pleaded ignorance: “I mean, if you had told me that six months ago, I would have laughed. I would have said, ‘No way.’"

A partial transcript of the 1992 PrimeTime Live segment can be found below. Click “expand” to read:

PrimeTime Live
1/30/1992

DIANE SAWYER: Some say she's his most powerful secret weapon.
 
HILLARY CLINTON:  The harder they hit, the more encouraged I get. I've worked very hard on education reform, worked very hard on children's and family issues- -to deal with the problems that are affecting this country!
 
SAWYER: Some wonder whether she should be running for the White House.

...

DONALDSON: Gennifer Flowers, who was paid by the tabloid Star to tell her story involving Bill Clinton and to play her tapes of alleged Clinton phone conversations, has the look of every married woman's nightmare: sleek, sexy, a blond femme fatale.
 
FLOWERS: Yes, I was Bill Clinton's lover for 12 years, and for the past two years I have lied to the press about our relationship to protect him.
 
CLINTON: Sam, if somebody's willing to pay you $130,000 or $170,000 to say something and you get your 15 minutes of fame and you get your picture on the front page of every newspaper and you're some failed cabaret singer who doesn't even have much of a resume to fall back on, and what's there, she's lied about- you know, that's the daughter of Willie Horton, as far as I'm concerned. It's the same kind of attempt to keep the real issues of this country out of the mainstream debate where they need to be.
 
DONALDSON: Tough words. But unlike her husband, whose speech tends to round off the sharp edges, Hillary Clinton, campaigning this week in Colorado, drove home her points with a jackhammer, although she says Flowers' bombshell came as a surprise to her.
 
CLINTON: I mean, if you had told me that six months ago, I would have laughed. I would have said, "No way."
 Show Less

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2018/03/30/flashback-hillary-and-media-scoffed-sleek-sexy-accusers-payday

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #317 on: April 02, 2018, 02:42:54 PM »
CNN mocked for glorifying JFKs ‘legendary’ infidelity after harping on sex allegations against Trump
By Brian Flood   | Fox News

CNN has different views on infidelity depending on the political affiliation of the alleged participant.

CNN was slammed for hypocrisy over the weekend when the network glorified President John F. Kennedy’s many infidelities after spending significant coverage painting President Trump as a monster for an alleged affair that occurred prior to his political career.

While promoting “The Kennedys,” CNN hailed the 35th president's “legendary love life,” before asking, “Did one of his affairs connect him with the mob?” The tweet featured video detailing JFK’s relationship with actress Judy Campbell, who was allegedly intimate with the head of the Chicago mafia while also having an affair with the president.

. . .

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/04/02/cnn-mocked-for-glorifying-jfks-legendary-infidelity-after-harping-on-sex-allegations-against-trump.html

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20648
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #318 on: April 02, 2018, 03:03:03 PM »
What’s genius for Obama is scandal when it comes to Trump
BY BEN SHAPIRO, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 03/20/18

On Sunday, The Guardian reported on the supposedly nefarious workings of President Trump’s data-gathering team at Cambridge Analytica. The report suggested that Cambridge Analytica had essentially issued questionnaires through a third party; those questionnaires, which were personality quizzes, requested that you use your Facebook login. Cambridge Analytica then compiled data regarding those who completed the quiz and cross-referenced that data with political preferences in order to target potential voters.

This isn’t particularly shocking. In 2012, The Guardian reported that President Obama’s reelection team was “building a vast digital data operation that for the first time combines a unified database on millions of Americans with the power of Facebook to target individual voters to a degree never achieved before.”

What, exactly, would Obama be doing? According to The Guardian, Obama’s new database would be gathered by asking individual volunteers to log into Obama’s reelection site using their Facebook credentials. “Consciously or otherwise,” The Guardian states, “the individual volunteer will be injecting all the information they store publicly on their Facebook page — home location, date of birth, interests and, crucially, network of friends — directly into the central Obama database.”

Facebook had no problem with such activity then. They do now. There’s a reason for that. The former Obama director of integration and media analytics stated that, during the 2012 campaign, Facebook allowed the Obama team to “suck out the whole social graph”; Facebook “was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing.” She added, “They came to [the] office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”

Not so with Trump. As soon as Facebook realized that Cambridge Analytica had pursued a similar strategy, they suspended the firm.

Again, this isn’t surprising. Since Trump’s election, Democrats — in search of a rationale for their favored candidate’s defeat — have blamed a bevy of social media outlets. Senate Democrats trotted out pathetic Russian-created memes on Facebook, viewed by a handful of human beings, as an excuse for Hillary’s loss; Democrats claimed — without evidence — that “fake news” had swamped Facebook and thus led to Trump’s victory. Democrats have also insisted that Facebook be regulated. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) raged, “You’ve created these platforms, and now they’re being misused, and you have to be the ones to do something about it. Or we will.” Facebook’s former privacy manager called for the government to step into an oversight role regarding Facebook.

In February, Wired magazine ran a cover story specifically dealing with Facebook’s role in the election of 2016, and their subsequent attempts to “fix” the problem. After the election, Mark Zuckerberg even met with Barack Obama, apparently in an attempt to convince Obama that he was serious about stopping the “misuse” of the platform. And in February, Zuckerberg said he wanted to re-jigger the algorithms on his platform to benefit content that Facebook deems “trustworthy, informative, and local.” Wired celebrated: “You can’t make the world more open and connected if you’re breaking it apart.”

The result of Facebook’s algorithmic changes: conservatives have been slammed. And that’s the point. A study from The Western Journal found that conservative sites have lost an average of 14 percent of their Facebook traffic; leftist sites saw a minor increase. Even major publications saw that effect: The New York Daily News saw a bump of 24.18 percent, while the New York Post dropped 11.44 percent.

And that’s the goal in covering Cambridge Analytica, and Russian interference on Twitter, and all the rest — even without any serious information suggesting that such interference shifted votes, the left can rest assured that its Silicon Valley allies will act to de-platform Republicans and conservatives. There’s a reason Twitter has suspended alt-right racists but continued to recommend that others follow Louis Farrakhan; there’s a reason YouTube is being sued by Prager University; there’s a reason Google used automatic fact-checking on right-wing sites but did no such thing for left-wing sites.

We’re in the midst of a radical reshifting in social media. Ironically, the people who have stumped against regulation — conservatives — are those being targeted by social media companies. If companies like Facebook, YouTube, Google and Twitter don’t start acting like platforms again rather than like motivated left-wing outlets, Republicans likely won’t let principle outweigh practicality for long.

http://thehill.com/opinion/technology/379245-whats-genius-for-obama-is-scandal-when-it-comes-to-trump


Very interesting & quite worrying at the same time if the above is true

Looks likely we are attempted to be “controlled” “brainwashed”  by many
Different forms of media.

Do any of us really escape all of it
I’d like to think I was - Now the more that comes out I’m doubting that is the case.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #319 on: April 02, 2018, 03:11:02 PM »

Very interesting & quite worrying at the same time if the above is true

Looks likely we are attempted to be “controlled” “brainwashed”  by many
Different forms of media.

Do any of us really escape all of it
I’d like to think I was - Now the more that comes out I’m doubting that is the case.

Man it is worse than you think.  If you want an eye opening look at how the public gets manipulated by the media you should read The Smear by Sharyl Attikisson.  I really don't trust anything I read or hear from news outlets.     

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20648
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #320 on: April 02, 2018, 03:19:35 PM »
Man it is worse than you think.  If you want an eye opening look at how the public gets manipulated by the media you should read The Smear by Sharyl Attikisson.  I really don't trust anything I read or hear from news outlets.     


That’s the same as me - question everything I read or hear from news providers
And very frequently I’m proved right to do so - as when the full facts / story is uncovered
It bares little resemblance to what was put out by the news.!!

I will be looking for a 2nd hand copy of that book.
Thanks.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #321 on: April 02, 2018, 03:31:03 PM »

That’s the same as me - question everything I read or hear from news providers
And very frequently I’m proved right to do so - as when the full facts / story is uncovered
It bares little resemblance to what was put out by the news.!!

I will be looking for a 2nd hand copy of that book.
Thanks.

No worries.  There is this saying in the Army that first reports are always wrong.  A lot of truth to that statement. 

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40727
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #322 on: April 02, 2018, 04:54:58 PM »
Man it is worse than you think.  If you want an eye opening look at how the public gets manipulated by the media you should read The Smear by Sharyl Attikisson.  I really don't trust anything I read or hear from news outlets.     

Sheep follow, not lead. Regardless of what side of the political spectrum folks are on, the tend to mirror the media from that perspective. What is most lacking is independent thinkers who are not afraid to buck the flock.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #323 on: April 02, 2018, 05:07:17 PM »
Sheep follow, not lead. Regardless of what side of the political spectrum folks are on, the tend to mirror the media from that perspective. What is most lacking is independent thinkers who are not afraid to buck the flock.

I agree.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40727
Re: Liberal Hypocrisy
« Reply #324 on: April 02, 2018, 05:20:28 PM »
I agree.

We agree. Who would of thought?