To those idiots who voted Obama in..

[The Ugly]

Im not a right winger and this is what I beleive to be true of him. He's a homosexual or bi-sexual. Hes lying about his birth.certificate, hes really good at lying, hes intentionally trying to bring this country down he's a globalist playing a part. I believe his father to be Frank Marshall Davis. A card carrying communist. He couldnt gave two shits about blacck people in Marrica aka the Hebrew Israelites of the bible.



Oh yeah, hes a Muslim. Thats for damn sure. Maybe even a satanist.

A Satanist, maybe? Man, that's some scary stuff. You think he worships the clef-footed, hornhead from the OT; or is he the more legit LaVey-type, dude who penned the Satanic Bible? Guy who believed it's all a buncha symbolic bullshit.

[DroppingPlates]

You don't even live here. Why involve yourself. But you can feel free to take him where you live. We have no use him.

And I'm more than happy that I live outside the US.
The thing is that many Muricans are pretty childish about politics in general, like it's a boxing match. You're a perfect example of this; short 'bad ass' statements and zero arguments.

[timfogarty]

.

[Coach is Back!]

And I'm more than happy that I live outside the US.
The thing is that many Muricans are pretty childish about politics in general, like it's a boxing match. You're a perfect example of this; short 'bad ass' statements and zero arguments.

You don't pay attention much do you? I'm probably one of the more vocal on here with a good tract record of predicting how this asshole would have turned out right from the beginning right up until now. I predicted he would ruin this country and so far he's gone beyond anyone's expectations. Even most of the liberals on here that voted for him are seeing he's a fraud.

[Coach is Back!]

.

Jesus, another left meme 

[The Ugly]

.

Please explain "ignored."

[The Ugly]

And I'm more than happy that I live outside the US.
The thing is that many Muricans are pretty childish about politics in general, like it's a boxing match. You're a perfect example of this; short 'bad ass' statements and zero arguments.

How do the more adult-minded voters outside Murica approach politics?

[Costanza]

Not being Murican myself Coach can you tell me why you and many US citizens hate Hussein Obama so much?

[timfogarty]

Please explain "ignored."

Reagan's AIDS Legacy / Silence equals death
Allen White Published 4:00 am, Tuesday, June 8, 2004

As America remembers the life of Ronald Reagan, it must never forget his shameful abdication of leadership in the fight against AIDS. History may ultimately judge his presidency by the thousands who have and will die of AIDS.

Following discovery of the first cases in 1981, it soon became clear a national health crisis was developing. But President Reagan's response was "halting and ineffective," according to his biographer Lou Cannon. Those infected initially with this mysterious disease -- all gay men -- found themselves targeted with an unprecedented level of mean-spirited hostility.

A significant source of Reagan's support came from the newly identified religious right and the Moral Majority, a political-action group founded by the Rev. Jerry Falwell. AIDS became the tool, and gay men the target, for the politics of fear, hate and discrimination. Falwell said "AIDS is the wrath of God upon homosexuals." Reagan's communications director Pat Buchanan argued that AIDS is "nature's revenge on gay men."

With each passing month, death and suffering increased at a frightening rate. Scientists, researchers and health care professionals at every level expressed the need for funding. The response of the Reagan administration was indifference.

By Feb. 1, 1983, 1,025 AIDS cases were reported, and at least 394 had died in the United States. Reagan said nothing. On April 23, 1984, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced 4,177 reported cases in America and 1,807 deaths. In San Francisco, the health department reported more than 500 cases. Again, Reagan said nothing. That same year, 1984, the Democratic National Convention convened in San Francisco. Hoping to focus attention on the need for AIDS research, education and treatment, more than 100,000 sympathizers marched from the Castro to Moscone Center.

With each diagnosis, the pain and suffering spread across America. Everyone seemed to now know someone infected with AIDS. At a White House state dinner, first lady Nancy Reagan expressed concern for a guest showing signs of significant weight loss. On July 25, 1985, the American Hospital in Paris announced that Rock Hudson had AIDS.

With AIDS finally out of the closet, activists such as Paul Boneberg, who in 1984 started Mobilization Against AIDS in San Francisco, begged President Reagan to say something now that he, like thousands of Americans, knew a person with AIDS. Writing in the Washington Post in late 1985, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, stated: "It is surprising that the president could remain silent as 6,000 Americans died, that he could fail to acknowledge the epidemic's existence. Perhaps his staff felt he had to, since many of his New Right supporters have raised money by campaigning against homosexuals."

Reagan would ultimately address the issue of AIDS while president. His remarks came May 31, 1987 (near the end of his second term), at the Third International Conference on AIDS in Washington. When he spoke, 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS and 20,849 had died. The disease had spread to 113 countries, with more than 50,000 cases.

As millions eulogize Reagan this week, the tragedy lies in what he might have done. Today, the World Health Organization estimates that more than 40 million people are living with HIV worldwide. An estimated 5 million people were newly infected and 3 million people died of AIDS in 2003 alone.

Reagan could have chosen to end the homophobic rhetoric that flowed from so many in his administration. Dr. C. Everett Koop, Reagan's surgeon general, has said that because of "intradepartmental politics" he was cut out of all AIDS discussions for the first five years of the Reagan administration. The reason, he explained, was "because transmission of AIDS was understood to be primarily in the homosexual population and in those who abused intravenous drugs." The president's advisers, Koop said, "took the stand, 'They are only getting what they justly deserve.' "

How profoundly different might have been the outcome if his leadership had generated compassion rather than hostility. "In the history of the AIDS epidemic, President Reagan's legacy is one of silence," Michael Cover, former associate executive director for public affairs at Whitman-Walker Clinic, the groundbreaking AIDS health-care organization in Washington. in 2003. "It is the silence of tens of thousands who died alone and unacknowledged, stigmatized by our government under his administration."

Revisionist history about Reagan must be rejected. Researchers, historians and AIDS experts who know the truth must not remain silent. Too many have died for that.

[DanM]

As long as people keeping pointing fingers at and laying the blame on schmucks like Obama or whatever twit will replace him next we're in big trouble. Failing to realize that they are merely puppets and faces to blame will leave the individuals really pulling the strings held completely unaccountable and free to continue on doing as they please without fear.

[DroppingPlates]

You don't pay attention much do you? I'm probably one of the more vocal on here with a good tract record of predicting how this asshole would have turned out right from the beginning right up until now. I predicted he would ruin this country and so far he's gone beyond anyone's expectations. Even most of the liberals on here that voted for him are seeing he's a fraud.

Joe, it's YOU who don't get it. I don't care on which side you are.
Yes, you're vocal, but in a silly sense, esp for being a fifty-something old man.

How do the more adult-minded voters outside Murica approach politics?

Good question. Sure, we have ever-complaining folks over here as well, but theres less drama & mud throwing. Instead, there's more argumentation and people have more control over their emotions.
This varies from party to party (there are more than 10 parties in the Netherlands); some parties attract more rational people, others more impulsive types.

[BigRo]

As long as people keeping pointing fingers at and laying the blame on schmucks like Obama or whatever twit will replace him next we're in big trouble. Failing to realize that they are merely puppets and faces to blame will leave the individuals really pulling the strings held completely unaccountable and free to continue on doing as they please without fear.

talk more about these people...

[muscleman-2013]

Aids was spread by perverse behavior.   Selfish promiscuous sexual gratification.  

How dare you compare that to medical carers risking their lives to help others.

[The Ugly]

Reagan's AIDS Legacy / Silence equals death
Allen White Published 4:00 am, Tuesday, June 8, 2004

As America remembers the life of Ronald Reagan, it must never forget his shameful abdication of leadership in the fight against AIDS. History may ultimately judge his presidency by the thousands who have and will die of AIDS.

Following discovery of the first cases in 1981, it soon became clear a national health crisis was developing. But President Reagan's response was "halting and ineffective," according to his biographer Lou Cannon. Those infected initially with this mysterious disease -- all gay men -- found themselves targeted with an unprecedented level of mean-spirited hostility.

A significant source of Reagan's support came from the newly identified religious right and the Moral Majority, a political-action group founded by the Rev. Jerry Falwell. AIDS became the tool, and gay men the target, for the politics of fear, hate and discrimination. Falwell said "AIDS is the wrath of God upon homosexuals." Reagan's communications director Pat Buchanan argued that AIDS is "nature's revenge on gay men."

With each passing month, death and suffering increased at a frightening rate. Scientists, researchers and health care professionals at every level expressed the need for funding. The response of the Reagan administration was indifference.

By Feb. 1, 1983, 1,025 AIDS cases were reported, and at least 394 had died in the United States. Reagan said nothing. On April 23, 1984, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced 4,177 reported cases in America and 1,807 deaths. In San Francisco, the health department reported more than 500 cases. Again, Reagan said nothing. That same year, 1984, the Democratic National Convention convened in San Francisco. Hoping to focus attention on the need for AIDS research, education and treatment, more than 100,000 sympathizers marched from the Castro to Moscone Center.

With each diagnosis, the pain and suffering spread across America. Everyone seemed to now know someone infected with AIDS. At a White House state dinner, first lady Nancy Reagan expressed concern for a guest showing signs of significant weight loss. On July 25, 1985, the American Hospital in Paris announced that Rock Hudson had AIDS.

With AIDS finally out of the closet, activists such as Paul Boneberg, who in 1984 started Mobilization Against AIDS in San Francisco, begged President Reagan to say something now that he, like thousands of Americans, knew a person with AIDS. Writing in the Washington Post in late 1985, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, stated: "It is surprising that the president could remain silent as 6,000 Americans died, that he could fail to acknowledge the epidemic's existence. Perhaps his staff felt he had to, since many of his New Right supporters have raised money by campaigning against homosexuals."

Reagan would ultimately address the issue of AIDS while president. His remarks came May 31, 1987 (near the end of his second term), at the Third International Conference on AIDS in Washington. When he spoke, 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS and 20,849 had died. The disease had spread to 113 countries, with more than 50,000 cases.

As millions eulogize Reagan this week, the tragedy lies in what he might have done. Today, the World Health Organization estimates that more than 40 million people are living with HIV worldwide. An estimated 5 million people were newly infected and 3 million people died of AIDS in 2003 alone.

Reagan could have chosen to end the homophobic rhetoric that flowed from so many in his administration. Dr. C. Everett Koop, Reagan's surgeon general, has said that because of "intradepartmental politics" he was cut out of all AIDS discussions for the first five years of the Reagan administration. The reason, he explained, was "because transmission of AIDS was understood to be primarily in the homosexual population and in those who abused intravenous drugs." The president's advisers, Koop said, "took the stand, 'They are only getting what they justly deserve.' "

How profoundly different might have been the outcome if his leadership had generated compassion rather than hostility. "In the history of the AIDS epidemic, President Reagan's legacy is one of silence," Michael Cover, former associate executive director for public affairs at Whitman-Walker Clinic, the groundbreaking AIDS health-care organization in Washington. in 2003. "It is the silence of tens of thousands who died alone and unacknowledged, stigmatized by our government under his administration."

Revisionist history about Reagan must be rejected. Researchers, historians and AIDS experts who know the truth must not remain silent. Too many have died for that.

Ok, thank you.

[muscleman-2013]

Reagan would ultimately address the issue of AIDS while president. His remarks came May 31, 1987 (near the end of his second term), at the Third International Conference on AIDS in Washington. When he spoke, 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS and 20,849 had died. The disease had spread to 113 countries, with more than 50,000 cases.

What could he have done Timmy?  Get perverts to stop acting like perverts?  Get a sick and selfish promiscuous culture to suddenly change it's ways?

[DroppingPlates]

Aids was spread by perverse behavior.   Selfish promiscuous sexual gratification.  

How dare you compare that to medical carers risking their lives to help others.

Helping Africa functions as a recipe for long term suffering, how perverse is that?..

[Necrosis]

EBOLA is not a problem, at all. Obama knows this, the right wing nuts are acting like this is the biggest thing since 9/11, no one has been infected that wasn't in direct contact with a dying person.

Influenza kills far more people.

[Darren Avey]

Looks like you guys will be getting another Bush running the show!! Jebs going to be the Republican candidate for 2016!

[King Shizzo]

You know whats funny?  Thinking that things will change around Getbig when a new president is elected.

You guys are still going to argue until our eyes bleed.

Politics and religion are exactly the same. Same arguments over and over, and nobody ever wins.

[Mr. MB]

.

I remember those times well. Liz Taylor and Barbara Streisand were telling America that AIDS was getting mainstream. They raised millions. The CDC and other educated Doctors and epidemiologists were saying it could not be transmitted vaginally unless by forced intercourse (rape) and blood had to be transferred...i.e. micro tears on the penis during anal, and shared needles. The well informed looked at it as a gay/drug user problem. So straight non needle sharing main stream Americans saw it as non threatening to them. The Hollywood/liberal/gay drums kept beating.

You could not get AIDS from someone sneezing on you or leaving their infected wet hand on a bathroom door handle on like EBOLA. You had to use a shared needle or give/take it in the ass from someone with HIV. Oh yes there are a few exceptions. Girl wipes backwards (or does both ports) and spreads AIDS virus from her previously anal-ed ass into her vagina (short viral life span), birthing with HIV, and other rare exceptions. Dental visits, kissing and mosquito worries were quickly discounted.  

So I can see why America today looks at EBOLA which can even kill their babies quite differently than AIDS. And if you were an adult in Reagan's time the mainstream culture outside of Hollywood could have given a rats ass about the gays and drug users.

My brother in law was known as 'Doctor to the stars'. He told me the truth about AIDS at the time. He was treating a well known NBA star.

[Hulkotron]

Obama forces himself on defenseless woman just trying to cast her vote:

[_aj_]

I've said since day one that anyone would be better than what we have. Obama makes Carter look like JFK.

[SF1900]

Obama forces himself on defenseless woman just trying to cast her vote:

[tleilaxutank]

Best president of the modern era.

[240 is Back]

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ebola-Obama-non-citizens/2014/10/17/id/601450/?promo_code=12BDE-1

Coach, if they held a national referendum vote as to whether or not to IMPEACH president obama, how would you vote?